Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1551 - 1600 of 12418 results
|
State v. Richardson
2020 ND 246 Highlight: Criminal conviction for felony reckless endangerment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Christianson v. NDDOT
2020 ND 245
Highlight: The Canadian statute making it illegal to drive while intoxicated defines an offense equivalent to North Dakota’s driving under the influence offense for purposes of N.D.C.C. § 39-06-27(1). The Department has jurisdiction to suspend an operator’s license for a conviction under the Canadian statute. |
|
State v. Wilkinson
2020 ND 244 Highlight: Criminal conviction for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
WSI v. Oden
2020 ND 243
Highlight: Valid service of process is necessary to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant. If a defendant challenges the court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving jurisdiction exists. The plaintiff must make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction to defeat a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. If the court relies only on pleadings and affidavits, the court must look at the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. |
|
Grengs v. Grengs
2020 ND 242
Highlight: The court lacked jurisdiction to resolve a motion to set aside a judgment during a pending appeal. |
|
State v. Vaagen
2020 ND 241
Highlight: The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and cannot be waived by the appellate court. |
|
Krolik v. Muscha
2020 ND 240 Highlight: Failure to observe proper hearing date provided in notice of hearing cannot be imputed to the district court. |
|
Interest of K.R.C.W. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2020 ND 239 Highlight: A juvenile court may terminate parental rights solely on a finding of deprivation when the child has been in foster care for at least four hundred fifty out of the previous six hundred sixty nights. |
|
Burden v. State
2020 ND 238 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Gates
2020 ND 237 Highlight: An appeal may be dismissed when an appellant’s brief fails to provide a court with an opportunity to meaningfully review the alleged error. |
|
Estate of Lindvig (consolidated w/20200136)
2020 ND 236
Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 47-10-23.1, a nontestamentary transfer of real property between spouses is conclusively presumed to be for consideration unless otherwise stated in writing. |
|
State, et al. v. P.K. (Confidential)
2020 ND 235
Highlight: In a child support action brought by the State on behalf of a parent, a counterclaim by the defendant seeking a determination of primary residential responsibility is not a counterclaim against the State for purposes of N.D.R.Civ.P. 13(d). |
|
MDU v. Behm
2020 ND 234
Highlight: Under the law of the case doctrine, a party cannot on a second appeal relitigate issues that were resolved in the first appeal or that would have been resolved had they been properly presented in the first appeal. |
|
Gooss v. Gooss, et al.
2020 ND 233
Highlight: The required payment of travel expenses to exercise parenting time constitutes child support and falls under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“UIFSA”). |
|
Jundt v. NDDOT
2020 ND 232 Highlight: The implied consent requirements of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01 do not apply when an individual consents to a chemical test. |
|
State v. Hajicek
2020 ND 231
Highlight: Pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 44-08-20(3), a law enforcement officer acting outside of his jurisdiction may lawfully respond to a request for assistance from an officer within his jurisdiction, even if the request is solicited by the out-of-jurisdiction officer. |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 5, Northeast Judicial District
2020 ND 230 Highlight: The vacancy in Judgeship No. 5 at Cavalier and Langdon, Northeast Judicial District, will be filled in the manner provided by N.D.C.C. Chapter 27-25. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Hibl
2020 ND 229 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
|
Discover Bank v. Bolinske, Sr.
2020 ND 228 Highlight: This Court will not consider documents in a party’s appendix that did not appear in the district court’s record under N.D.R.App.P. 30(a)(1). A party is not entitled to oral argument on a motion to vacate unless they follow the requirements of N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3) and secure a time for the argument within 14 days of the request. Issues not adequately briefed will not be addressed on appeal. A party’s appearance, without a pleading showing a meritorious defense, does not protect a party from default judgment. The district court was not required under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(3) to set forth findings of fact in its order denying the motion to vacate. |
|
Estate of Finstrom (Consolidated with 20190361)
2020 ND 227
Highlight: Undue influence is improper influence exercised over a grantor in such a way and to such an extent as to destroy his or her voluntary action by substituting for his will the will of another. |
|
Matter of Hehn
2020 ND 226 Highlight: Civil commitment decisions require detailed findings, including credibility determinations and references to evidence the court relied on in making its decision. Conclusory, general findings do not comply with N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a). |
|
Titan Machinery v. Kluver
2020 ND 225
Highlight: In a bench trial, the district court decides credibility issues, and we will not second-guess the district court on its credibility decisions. |
|
Hunter v. State
2020 ND 224
Highlight: Claims barred by res judicata are not preserved in post-conviction relief proceedings by combining them with claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. |
|
WSI v. Tolman
2020 ND 223
Highlight: Statutory interpretation presents a question of law. Statutory provisions are given their plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning unless a contrary intention plainly appears. |
|
Thiele v. Bousquet, et al.
2020 ND 222 Highlight: A summary judgment in a personal injury action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). |
|
Yost v. State (consolidated w/20200149-2020151)
2020 ND 221 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Gonzalez v. State
2020 ND 220 Highlight: A district court’s order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Lubitz
2020 ND 219 Highlight: Criminal conviction for murder summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
|
Hoffarth v. Hoffarth
2020 ND 218 |
|
Ring v. NDDHS
2020 ND 217 Highlight: When ruling on a motion for substitution upon a party’s death, the district court must determine whether the case was extinguished by the death, and if not, whether the party seeking substitution is the proper successor. |
|
State v. Long
2020 ND 216
Highlight: A district court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss is affirmed. |
|
City of Minot v. Miller
2020 ND 215 Highlight: Exclusion of a chemical test through the application of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(b) is not an available remedy in a criminal proceeding not involving a refusal. |
|
State v. Trefethren
2020 ND 214 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
G & D Enterprises v. Liebelt
2020 ND 213
Highlight: The duty which gives rise to a nuisance claim is the absolute duty not to act in a way which unreasonably interferes with other persons’ use and enjoyment of their property. |
|
Bickel v. Bickel
2020 ND 212
Highlight: If the district court finds certain past income is an unreliable indicator of the obligor’s future income, the court must explain why the income it utilized in determining the child support obligation was appropriate. |
|
Toure v. State
2020 ND 211 Highlight: A district court’s order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Beyer v. State
2020 ND 210 Highlight: An order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of C.A.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2020 ND 209
Highlight: A party seeking termination of parental rights must prove all the elements by clear and convincing evidence. |
|
State v. Devine
2020 ND 208 Highlight: The exclusionary rule previously codified within N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01(3)(b) did not apply to a test obtained pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01.1. |
|
Bismarck Financial Group, et al. v. Caldwell
2020 ND 207
Highlight: A motion to dismiss under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) tests the legal sufficiency of the claims in the complaint, and it must not be granted unless it discloses with certainty the impossibility of proving a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
|
Suelzle v. NDDOT
2020 ND 206
Highlight: A person may be arrested for actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol if the vehicle is located on private property in a private area to which the public has a right of access. |
|
Hall v. Hall, et al.
2020 ND 205
Highlight: A district court has greater liberty in granting motions under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) when the matter involves a default judgment rather than a judgment following a full trial on the merits. |
|
RFM-TREI Jefferson Apartments v. Stark County Board of Comm'rs (consol w/ cont)
2020 ND 204
Highlight: An assessment that exceeds the true and full value of property is contrary to N.D.C.C. § 57-23-01, which provides that “assessments of any taxable property in excess of the full and true value in money are subject to correction and abatement and refund.” When a Board denies a request to abate such an assessment, it acts contrary to the legislature’s directive, and the Court will conclude the abatement denial is arbitrary and unreasonable. |
|
Onstad v. Jaeger, et al.
2020 ND 203
Highlight: Section 16.1-01-08, N.D.C.C., authorizes a court to order the secretary of state to correct an error which has been committed in printing the ballot, and does not place a time limitation on the court’s authority to order the correction of a ballot before the election. |
|
O'Keeffe v. O'Keeffe
2020 ND 201
Highlight: An award of spousal support is rehabilitative when it is ordered to provide the receiving spouse an opportunity to acquire an education, training, work skills, or experience to increase earning capacity or to become self-supporting. |
|
State v. Edwards
2020 ND 200
Highlight: Failure to assert a claim of obvious error on appeal does not warrant review under the obvious error standard. |
|
Velasquez v. State
2020 ND 199 Highlight: The order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
State v. Tolbert
2020 ND 198 Highlight: The criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
Woelfel v. Gifford
2020 ND 197
Highlight: Post-judgment modification of residential responsibility is governed by statute which provides the standard for a court to apply. |
|
Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. Aaland, et al.
2020 ND 196
Highlight: Under Rule 8, N.D.R.App.P., the Court has the authority to grant a stay pending appeal. |