Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3241 - 3250 of 12403 results
|
State v. Grzeskowiak (cross reference w/20130396)
2014 ND 177 Highlight: Denial of a motion for an extension of time to file an appeal of a criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Meidinger
2014 ND 176 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
|
Western Horizons Living Centers v. Feland, et al.
2014 ND 175
Highlight: The Supreme Court exercises discretionary authority to issue supervisory writs rarely and cautiously to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases in which no adequate alterative remedy exists. |
|
Lindsey v. State
2014 ND 174
Highlight: The affirmative defense of laches, when properly raised and supported, presents a question of fact and is inappropriate for a district court to decide on summary judgment. |
|
Olsen v. State
2014 ND 173 Highlight: When the law is unsettled, the failure to raise an issue is objectively reasonable and therefore not deficient performance for purposes of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. |
|
Interest of T.R.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2014 ND 172 Highlight: An appellate court cannot properly review a decision if the trial court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |
|
Rath v. Rath (cross-ref. w/20130025, 20130184 & 20130327)
2014 ND 171
Highlight: A district court's decision on whether a contempt has been committed and remedial sanctions are warranted lies within its sound discretion, which will not be overturned on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. |
|
Krueger v. Grand Forks County
2014 ND 170
Highlight: When parties move to compel discovery, they are required to include certification that they have in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action. |
|
S.L.W. v. Huss
2014 ND 169 Highlight: Under the hearsay exception for a child's statement about sexual abuse, if a child is unavailable as a witness there must be "corroborative evidence of the act which is the subject of the statement," in addition to guarantees of trustworthiness, for the statement to be admissible in a civil proceeding. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Kellington (Consolidated w/ 20140081)
2014 ND 168
Highlight: After misconduct has been established, a hearing panel may, but is not required to consider mitigating factors when deciding what sanction to impose on a lawyer. |