Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3301 - 3400 of 12359 results
Law v. Whittet, et al.
2014 ND 69
Highlight: Although not required to make a separate finding on each best interest factor or to address each minute detail presented in the evidence when determining primary residential responsibility, the district court may not wholly ignore and fail to acknowledge or explain significant evidence clearly favoring one party. |
Topolski v. Topolski
2014 ND 68
Highlight: A district court has substantial discretion in deciding primary residential responsibility, but the court must consider all of the applicable best interest factors. |
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Skoda, et al.
2014 ND 67
Highlight: All relevant facts are admitted when a party fails to respond to a request for admissions. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al.
2014 ND 66 Highlight: A district court's determinations regarding mental capacity and undue influence are questions of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. |
State v. Zeller
2014 ND 65
Highlight: When a warrant application seeks authorization for a nighttime search, an additional showing of probable cause is required for the nighttime authorization. |
Estate of Wicklund (cross-reference w/20110081)
2014 ND 64
Highlight: A personal representative may be reimbursed for payment of a decedent's funeral and last illness expenses. |
Interest of Hoff (cross-ref. w/20120248 & 20130216)
2014 ND 63 Highlight: The district court must make findings on each element of the sexually dangerous individual analysis, including the consideration of whether an individual has difficulty controlling his behavior. |
Disciplinary Board v. Overboe (Consol. w/ 20130304-20130306)
2014 ND 62
Highlight: A long delay between a petition for discipline and the disciplinary hearing must destroy the fundamental fairness of the entire disciplinary process to warrant dismissal of the disciplinary case. |
Anderson v. Lyons, et al.
2014 ND 61
Highlight: Service of notice of entry of judgment is not required to begin the time for filing a post-judgment motion or appeal if the record clearly evidences actual knowledge of entry of judgment through affirmative action of the moving or appealing party. |
Risovi v. Job Service
2014 ND 60 Highlight: A fact finder's conclusions that false statements were made for the purpose of obtaining unemployment benefits are affirmed if a reasoning mind could have determined that the factual conclusions were proved by the weight of the evidence. |
State v. Johnson (cross ref. w/20130137 - briefs not published)
2014 ND 59 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a defendant conditionally pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Silva
2014 ND 58 Highlight: Convictions of gross sexual imposition and continuous sexual abuse of a child are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Holkesvig v. Grove (cross reference w/ 20120169 & 20120225)
2014 ND 57
Highlight: Res judicata and collateral estoppel bar courts from relitigating claims and issues. |
Regan v. Lervold
2014 ND 56
Highlight: The party moving for modification of primary residential responsibility has the burden of proving a material change in circumstances has occurred. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 55 Highlight: Supreme Court takes judicial notice of prior proceeding and orders judgeship retained and filled according to law. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 4, NCJD
2014 ND 54 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Minot. |
Hector v. City of Fargo
2014 ND 53
Highlight: An appeal from a decision imposing special assessments provides an adequate legal remedy for challenging special assessments, and a separate action for equitable relief generally will not lie for issues that are raised or could have been raised in the appeal. |
Union Bank v. Tarnavsky, et al. (consol. w/20130387; cross-ref. w/ 20110061)
2014 ND 52 Highlight: Orders denying motions for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(1) and a judgment dismissing a cross-claim in a foreclosure case are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |
Haugland v. City of Bismarck (cross ref. 20110077)
2014 ND 51
Highlight: Summary judgment is inappropriate when one can draw reasonable inferences that support the positions of both sides in a controversy and a fact-finder could draw negative inferences from the absence of documentation or records in a case. |
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Corwin
2014 ND 50
Highlight: In a judicial disciplinary proceeding, whether a judge's conduct constituted sexual harassment as defined under federal or state laws is not a relevant inquiry. |
Rodriguez v. N.D. State Penitentiary, et al.
2014 ND 49 Highlight: An appeal regarding calculation of eligibility for parole becomes moot when the defendant becomes eligible for parole. |
Potratz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 48
Highlight: Repeating the inclusion of the date within the test result portion of an officer's certified report to the Department is not necessary to satisfy the statute. |
Fossum v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 47 Highlight: When a person voluntarily consents to to testing, it is unnecessary to arrest and inform an individual of the reasons for arrest prior to chemical testing under the implied consent. |
State v. Vandermeer
2014 ND 46
Highlight: As an exception to the hearsay rule, a person may testify as to his or her age and date of birth. |
Vandal v. Leno
2014 ND 45
Highlight: In deciding a primary residential responsibility, the district court must consider all the best interest of the child factors. A separate finding for each factor is not required, but the findings must be sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 44 Highlight: The Supreme Court may exercise jurisdiction over disciplinary matters arising from federal immigration proceedings involving a North Dakota lawyer. |
State v. Benson
2014 ND 43 Highlight: Conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Coppage v. State (cross reference w/20070304, 20110076, & 20120267)
2014 ND 42
Highlight: Attempted murder under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life is not a cognizable offense. |
Osier v. State
2014 ND 41 Highlight: To meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland ineffective assistance of counsel test, the defendant bears the heavy burden of establishing a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
Peterson, et al. v. Jasmanka, et al.
2014 ND 40
Highlight: The statutory procedure in N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1 allowing a surface owner to acquire abandoned minerals is a separate, distinct procedure from a subsequent quiet title action. |
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-Renner, et al.
2014 ND 39
Highlight: The phrase "resident of your household" in an automobile insurance policy is not ambiguous, and the determination of whether a person falls within the meaning of the phrase is a question of fact. |
Zavadil, et al. v. Rud, et al.
2014 ND 38 Highlight: An accommodation party is obliged to pay an instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. |
Balvitsch, et al. v. Dakota Burger N Fries Corp., et al.
2014 ND 37
Highlight: Due process requires a contemnor receive notice and a fair hearing when the alleged contempt involves conduct outside the court's presence. |
Tweed v. State
2014 ND 36 Highlight: Appeal from denial of application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Shaft
2014 ND 35 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Anderson, et al. v. Zimbelman, et al.
2014 ND 34
Highlight: Constructive fraud requires a breach of duty leading to an advantage for the party misleading. The breach of duty generally arises from a confidential or fiduciary relationship between the parties. |
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagar
2014 ND 33 Highlight: A judge may be suspended without pay for a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. |
Interest of G.R. (Confidential)
2014 ND 32
Highlight: In termination of parental rights cases, the petitioner must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child is deprived, the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. |
Matter of Mangelsen
2014 ND 31 Highlight: For civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, the conduct relied upon to demonstrate the individual's serious difficulty controlling his behavior need not be sexual in nature. |
State v. Reis (consol. w/ 20130193 & 20130194)
2014 ND 30
Highlight: A police officer may search a vehicle without a warrant if there is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband. |
Estate of Huston
2014 ND 29
Highlight: An order denying a petition to remove a personal representative in the unsupervised probate of an estate is appealable without a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b). |
Interest of R.L.-P. (consolidated w/ 20130383-20130386 & 20130388)
2014 ND 28
Highlight: Parental rights may be terminated when the children are deprived and have been in foster care more than 450 out of the previous 660 nights. |
Delaney v. State
2014 ND 27 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Brockel v. WSI
2014 ND 26
Highlight: Until proper notice is given, Workforce Safety and Insurance cannot terminate disability benefits on the basis that the claimant failed to verify disability. |
Bredeson v. Mackey
2014 ND 25
Highlight: Marriage of one or both parents may constitute a change of circumstances that is not material and therefore does not require modification of parenting time. |
Wampler v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 24
Highlight: The Department of Transportation must meet the basic and mandatory provisions of N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1 to have authority to suspend a person's driving privileges. |
Hamre v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 23
Highlight: A person appealing to the district court from a Department of Transportation decision to suspend privileges must comply with the specifications of error requirements under N.D.C.C. 28-32-42(4). |
Brandt v. Brandt
2014 ND 22 Highlight: Divorce judgment distributing parties' marital property and order denying post-judgment motion are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Swearingen v. State (cross-ref. w/20130063)
2014 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Oie v. State
2014 ND 20 Highlight: District court judgment denying application for postconviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Summers (Consolidated w/ 20130415 & 20130416)
2014 ND 19 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
State v. Cook
2014 ND 18 Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. When an appellant fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so that meaningful review of his issues is impossible, the appeal may be dismissed. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 17 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 16 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Linton. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, ECJD
2014 ND 15 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Fargo. |
State v. Holbach (cross-reference w/ 20120155 & 20120215)
2014 ND 14
Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of defendants who, as a result of a mental disease or defect, lack capacity to understand the proceedings against them or to assist in their defense. |
Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al.
2014 ND 13
Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation. |
Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine
2014 ND 12
Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense. |
Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen
2014 ND 11
Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor. |
Phillips v. State
2014 ND 10
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas
2014 ND 9 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being. |
Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al.
2014 ND 8 Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call. |
Trosen v. Trosen, et al.
2014 ND 7
Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement. |
Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224)
2014 ND 6 Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so. |
Conzemius v. Conzemius
2014 ND 5
Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property. |
State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168)
2014 ND 4
Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others. |
Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Peterson, et al.
2014 ND 3 Highlight: A district court may award attorney fees for allegations and denials in any pleadings in court that are made without reasonable cause and not in good faith and are found to be untrue. |
Lucas v. Lucas (cross-reference w/20110365)
2014 ND 2
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in making a primary residential responsibility decision, but the court must consider all of the relevant statutory best-interest factors in reaching its decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (Consolidated w/ 20130344 & 20130345)
2014 ND 1 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111)
2013 ND 253
Highlight: The State of North Dakota owned mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upon admission to the Union, and the anti-gift clause of the state constitution precludes construing a statute as a gift of the State's mineral interests to upland owners. |
State v. Nguyen
2013 ND 252 Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search. |
Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347)
2013 ND 251 Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289)
2013 ND 250 Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed. |
Dominguez v. State
2013 ND 249
Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime. |
Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al.
2013 ND 248
Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07. |
Interest of D.O. (Confidential)
2013 ND 247
Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included. |
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010)
2013 ND 246
Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance. |
Krueger v. Krueger (Cross-reference w/20070196)
2013 ND 245 Highlight: A party seeking a contempt sanction must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed. An inability to comply with an order is a defense to contempt proceedings, but the alleged contemnor has the burden to prove the defense. |
Stensland v. Disciplinary Board
2013 ND 244
Highlight: A suspended lawyer has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence the requisite honesty and integrity to be reinstated to the practice of law. |
Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20130327 & 20130025)
2013 ND 243
Highlight: Technical violations of a court order do not necessarily require a finding of contempt. |
State, et al. v. B.B., et al. (confidential)
2013 ND 242
Highlight: A paternity and support claim can be bifurcated from a related custody action. |
Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners
2013 ND 241
Highlight: The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision. |
Bahtiraj v. State
2013 ND 240 Highlight: Without more, the second Strickland prong is not satisfied by a self-serving statement that the petitioner would have insisted on going to trial. Factors to consider when determining the rationality of rejecting a guilty plea and insisting on going to trial include immigration consequences, strength of the case against the petitioner, and rational defenses to the charged crime. |
State v. Otto
2013 ND 239 Highlight: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to a readily mobile camper that is not in a place regularly used for residential purposes. |
Kinsella v. State
2013 ND 238 Highlight: Failure to move pretrial to suppress evidence, by itself, does not equate to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, but where counsel has no reason to question the search and seizure, failure to file a motion to suppress does not render the representation ineffective. |
Morton County Social Service Board, et al. v. Houim
2013 ND 237
Highlight: When a party moves to modify primary residential responsibility of a child, the district court must consider only the party's motion on briefs, affidavits, and other supporting documents to determine whether the moving party established a prima facie case and is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Canfield
2013 ND 236 Highlight: An inadequate record may make appellate review of the district court's denial of a suppression motion impossible, thus requiring reversal and remand for further proceedings. |
Parsons v. WSI
2013 ND 235
Highlight: A claimant for workers' compensation benefits must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury. |
State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile
2013 ND 234
Highlight: Due process requires that a notice of forfeiture hearing be served on any interested party. |
Matter of Muscha
2013 ND 233 Highlight: Order civilly committing appellant as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Fee (consol. 20130177)
2013 ND 232 Highlight: A district court judgment forfeiting property connected to criminal activity is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Ruddell
2013 ND 231 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered for abandonment or nonsupport of a child is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kippen (consolidated w/20130263)
2013 ND 230 Highlight: Convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kaka
2013 ND 229 Highlight: Conviction for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Johnson v. State
2013 ND 228 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Reciprocal Discipline of Murrin
2013 ND 227 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WSI, et al.
2013 ND 226 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order awarding benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6, East Central Judicial District
2013 ND 225 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Fargo. |
State v. Rau
2013 ND 224 Highlight: A conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kling
2013 ND 223 Highlight: A criminal judgment for disorderly conduct is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |