Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3401 - 3500 of 12418 results
Delaney v. State
2014 ND 27 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Brockel v. WSI
2014 ND 26
Highlight: Until proper notice is given, Workforce Safety and Insurance cannot terminate disability benefits on the basis that the claimant failed to verify disability. |
Bredeson v. Mackey
2014 ND 25
Highlight: Marriage of one or both parents may constitute a change of circumstances that is not material and therefore does not require modification of parenting time. |
Wampler v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 24
Highlight: The Department of Transportation must meet the basic and mandatory provisions of N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1 to have authority to suspend a person's driving privileges. |
Hamre v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 23
Highlight: A person appealing to the district court from a Department of Transportation decision to suspend privileges must comply with the specifications of error requirements under N.D.C.C. 28-32-42(4). |
Brandt v. Brandt
2014 ND 22 Highlight: Divorce judgment distributing parties' marital property and order denying post-judgment motion are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Swearingen v. State (cross-ref. w/20130063)
2014 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Oie v. State
2014 ND 20 Highlight: District court judgment denying application for postconviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Summers (Consolidated w/ 20130415 & 20130416)
2014 ND 19 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
State v. Cook
2014 ND 18 Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. When an appellant fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so that meaningful review of his issues is impossible, the appeal may be dismissed. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 17 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 16 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Linton. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, ECJD
2014 ND 15 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Fargo. |
State v. Holbach (cross-reference w/ 20120155 & 20120215)
2014 ND 14
Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of defendants who, as a result of a mental disease or defect, lack capacity to understand the proceedings against them or to assist in their defense. |
Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al.
2014 ND 13
Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation. |
Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine
2014 ND 12
Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense. |
Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen
2014 ND 11
Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor. |
Phillips v. State
2014 ND 10
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas
2014 ND 9 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being. |
Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al.
2014 ND 8 Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call. |
Trosen v. Trosen, et al.
2014 ND 7
Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement. |
Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224)
2014 ND 6 Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so. |
Conzemius v. Conzemius
2014 ND 5
Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property. |
State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168)
2014 ND 4
Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others. |
Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Peterson, et al.
2014 ND 3 Highlight: A district court may award attorney fees for allegations and denials in any pleadings in court that are made without reasonable cause and not in good faith and are found to be untrue. |
Lucas v. Lucas (cross-reference w/20110365)
2014 ND 2
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in making a primary residential responsibility decision, but the court must consider all of the relevant statutory best-interest factors in reaching its decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (Consolidated w/ 20130344 & 20130345)
2014 ND 1 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111)
2013 ND 253
Highlight: The State of North Dakota owned mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upon admission to the Union, and the anti-gift clause of the state constitution precludes construing a statute as a gift of the State's mineral interests to upland owners. |
State v. Nguyen
2013 ND 252 Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search. |
Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347)
2013 ND 251 Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289)
2013 ND 250 Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed. |
Dominguez v. State
2013 ND 249
Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime. |
Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al.
2013 ND 248
Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07. |
Interest of D.O. (Confidential)
2013 ND 247
Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included. |
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010)
2013 ND 246
Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance. |
Krueger v. Krueger (Cross-reference w/20070196)
2013 ND 245 Highlight: A party seeking a contempt sanction must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed. An inability to comply with an order is a defense to contempt proceedings, but the alleged contemnor has the burden to prove the defense. |
Stensland v. Disciplinary Board
2013 ND 244
Highlight: A suspended lawyer has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence the requisite honesty and integrity to be reinstated to the practice of law. |
Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20130327 & 20130025)
2013 ND 243
Highlight: Technical violations of a court order do not necessarily require a finding of contempt. |
State, et al. v. B.B., et al. (confidential)
2013 ND 242
Highlight: A paternity and support claim can be bifurcated from a related custody action. |
Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners
2013 ND 241
Highlight: The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision. |
Bahtiraj v. State
2013 ND 240 Highlight: Without more, the second Strickland prong is not satisfied by a self-serving statement that the petitioner would have insisted on going to trial. Factors to consider when determining the rationality of rejecting a guilty plea and insisting on going to trial include immigration consequences, strength of the case against the petitioner, and rational defenses to the charged crime. |
State v. Otto
2013 ND 239 Highlight: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to a readily mobile camper that is not in a place regularly used for residential purposes. |
Kinsella v. State
2013 ND 238 Highlight: Failure to move pretrial to suppress evidence, by itself, does not equate to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, but where counsel has no reason to question the search and seizure, failure to file a motion to suppress does not render the representation ineffective. |
Morton County Social Service Board, et al. v. Houim
2013 ND 237
Highlight: When a party moves to modify primary residential responsibility of a child, the district court must consider only the party's motion on briefs, affidavits, and other supporting documents to determine whether the moving party established a prima facie case and is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Canfield
2013 ND 236 Highlight: An inadequate record may make appellate review of the district court's denial of a suppression motion impossible, thus requiring reversal and remand for further proceedings. |
Parsons v. WSI
2013 ND 235
Highlight: A claimant for workers' compensation benefits must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury. |
State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile
2013 ND 234
Highlight: Due process requires that a notice of forfeiture hearing be served on any interested party. |
Matter of Muscha
2013 ND 233 Highlight: Order civilly committing appellant as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Fee (consol. 20130177)
2013 ND 232 Highlight: A district court judgment forfeiting property connected to criminal activity is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Ruddell
2013 ND 231 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered for abandonment or nonsupport of a child is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kippen (consolidated w/20130263)
2013 ND 230 Highlight: Convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kaka
2013 ND 229 Highlight: Conviction for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Johnson v. State
2013 ND 228 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Reciprocal Discipline of Murrin
2013 ND 227 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WSI, et al.
2013 ND 226 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order awarding benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6, East Central Judicial District
2013 ND 225 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Fargo. |
State v. Rau
2013 ND 224 Highlight: A conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Kling
2013 ND 223 Highlight: A criminal judgment for disorderly conduct is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Craft
2013 ND 222 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Wolff (Consol. w/ 20130268-20130273)
2013 ND 221 Highlight: Lawyer disbarment ordered. |
Reciprocal Discipline of Kalk
2013 ND 220 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc., et al.
2013 ND 219
Highlight: Use of the words "subject to" in a warranty deed connotes a limitation on the grantor's warranty and not a reservation of rights. |
Van Sickle, et al. v. Hallmark & Assoc., Inc., et al. (cross-reference 20070154
2013 ND 218
Highlight: In a proceeding under N.D.C.C. 47-16-39.1 to recover unpaid oil and gas royalties, a "prevailing party" is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. |
Oakland v. Bowman, et al.
2013 ND 217
Highlight: North Dakota has not adopted equitable tolling as an exception to a statute of limitations. |
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Halvorson
2013 ND 216 Highlight: A party may renew a judgment by either complying with the affidavit procedure under N.D.C.C. 28-20-21 or commencing a separate action on the judgment. |
Estates of Shubert
2013 ND 215
Highlight: An appeal is moot if no actual controversy exists because subsequent events have made it impossible for the court to provide effective relief. |
Moore v. State
2013 ND 214
Highlight: On appeal of a summary dismissal of an application for postconviction relief, a reviewing court must determine whether or not the information available to the district court, when viewed in a light most favorable to the opposing party, precludes the existence of a genuine issue of material fact and entitles the moving party to summary dismissal as a matter of law. |
State v. Blagen
2013 ND 213 Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Wald v. Holmes
2013 ND 212
Highlight: The doctrine of res judicata should not be strictly applied to preclude the trial court from hearing for the first time relevant primary residential responsibility-related evidence bearing on considerations of what is in a child's best interests. |
Adoption of I.R.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 211 Highlight: A parent's parental rights may be terminated by a court order in connection with an adoption action if the parent abandoned the child. |
Pesanti v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2013 ND 210 Highlight: Continuous and gradual weaving significantly more pronounced than "slight" weaving, engine revving, and the time of day an incident occurred may all contribute to the totality of the circumstances providing an officer with a reasonable and articulable suspicion for a traffic stop. |
Sateren v. Sateren (cross-referenced w/20120192)
2013 ND 209 Highlight: District court order explaining and reaffirming an earlier order denying reallocation of marital property and debt in a divorce case is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Klamm
2013 ND 208 Highlight: Criminal judgment after a defendant conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of T.D., a Child (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 207 Highlight: Juvenile court judgment terminating father's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of H.D. (Confidential)
2013 ND 206 Highlight: Continuing treatment order and involuntary treatment with medication order summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of C.N. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 205
Highlight: As part of a deprived child analysis, a parent must demonstrate present capability, or capability within the near future, to be an adequate parent. |
State, et al. v. Eli
2013 ND 204 Highlight: Default judgment imputing minimum wage as basis for child support calculation for unemployed incarcerated obligor summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Newman v. State
2013 ND 203 Highlight: District court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
State v. Klamm
2013 ND 202 Highlight: A district court judgment entered after a conditional guilty plea to driving under suspension is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3), and (7). |
Davis v. State
2013 ND 201 Highlight: A district court judgment summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
City of Fargo v. White
2013 ND 200 Highlight: A district court's summary affirmance of a municipal court judgment under N.D.R.Crim.P. 37(l) may not occur at proceedings which occur before the trial anew. |
State v. Lattergrass
2013 ND 199 Highlight: A criminal judgment for simple assault on a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Peterson v. Pierce, et al.
2013 ND 198 Highlight: In a dispute over a lost rental payment, the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Lang
2013 ND 197 Highlight: Conviction for theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Danuser v. IDA Marketing Corp., et al.
2013 ND 196
Highlight: A director in a closely-held corporation may be liable to a single shareholder for actions that unfairly prejudice the shareholder. |
State v. Evans
2013 ND 195
Highlight: Lay witness testimony, in the form of an opinion, must be rationally based on the perception of the witness and also helpful to the jury's determination of a fact in question. |
State v. Mossey
2013 ND 194 Highlight: Conviction for class B felony luring a minor by computer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Hillerson, et al. v. Bismarck Public Schools, et al.
2013 ND 193
Highlight: When reasonable differences of opinion exist as to the terms of a release of liability provision in a contract, the release of liability provision is ambiguous, and summary judgment is not appropriate. |
Kukla v. Kukla
2013 ND 192
Highlight: A party moving for relief from a judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) has the burden to establish sufficient grounds for disturbing the finality of the decree, and relief should be granted only in exceptional circumstances. |
Matter of Hehn (consolidated w/ 20130143)
2013 ND 191 Highlight: A person civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual is entitled as a matter of right to only one discharge hearing within a twelve-month period. |
Matter of Rubey (cross-reference 20100292 & 20110322)
2013 ND 190
Highlight: A proponent of excluded evidence must make an offer of proof to the trial court and show prejudice from the restriction to show an abuse of discretion. |
State ex rel. City of Marion v. Alber
2013 ND 189
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion when a finding of willful contempt is supported by the evidence and inferences from the evidence. |
State v. Samshal
2013 ND 188
Highlight: In criminal cases, a defendant's testimony about statements made by the victim of the alleged offense, offered to establish the defendant's state of mind, are not hearsay because they are not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. |
Empower the Taxpayer, et al. v. Fong, et al.(cross-ref w/20120191, 197, 444
2013 ND 187
Highlight: A reviewing court cannot perform its appellate function unless it is able to understand the basis for the trial court's decision, and therefore the trial court must provide an adequate explanation of the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision. |
Kershaw v. WSI
2013 ND 186
Highlight: Separation of powers prevents the Supreme Court from making independent findings of fact or substituting its judgment for that of the agency fact finder. |
Rustad v. Rustad
2013 ND 185
Highlight: In determining primary residential responsibility, the district court is required to consider all of the best interest factors and make findings with sufficient specificity to enable the reviewing court to understand the factual basis for the court's decision. |
State v. Howard
2013 ND 184
Highlight: Issues not raised at the trial court level, even constitutional issues, generally will not be addressed for the first time on appeal. |
State v. Whitman
2013 ND 183
Highlight: Plain error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b) may be noticed by the Court on its own motion. |
State v. Arot
2013 ND 182
Highlight: For the district court to have jurisdiction, the State must prove, by the preponderance of the evidence, that a defendant is not a minor. |
State v. Johnson
2013 ND 181 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |