Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3611 - 3620 of 12446 results
Painte v. Dep't of Transportation
2013 ND 95 Highlight: Actual physical control of a vehicle does not require a defendant be able to drive a An affidavit attesting to the affiant's status as a designee of the director of the North Dakota Crime Laboratory is sufficient foundation for establishing prima facie evidence of the affiant's status as a designee for the purposes of section 29-20-07, N.D.C.C. |
State v. Butcher
2013 ND 93 Highlight: Criminal judgment for conspiracy to commit robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Spotted Wolf v. State
2013 ND 92 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State v. Smith
2013 ND 91 Highlight: Criminal judgment for attempted robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Ratka v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2013 ND 90 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
State v. Pearson (Consolidated w/ 20120438 & 20120439)
2013 ND 89 Highlight: A judgment revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Grant
2013 ND 88 Highlight: A district court criminal judgment and sentence for contact by bodily fluids is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Gray v. State
2013 ND 87 Highlight: A district court order denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Chambering of Judgeship No. 11 in the Northwest Judicial District
2013 ND 86 Highlight: New judgeship to be chambered in Watford City. |
Matthew Larson Trust Agreement
2013 ND 85
Highlight: A trust may be reformed when there is clear and convincing evidence that both the settlor's intent and the terms of the trust were affected by a mistake of fact or law, whether in expression or inducement. |