Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3661 - 3670 of 12403 results
State v. Vetter
2013 ND 4 Highlight: A vehicle may be found to be a dangerous weapon under N.D.C.C. 12.1-01-04(6). |
Adoption of D.J.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 3 Highlight: Civil judgment denying an applicant's petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Holkesvig v. Moore (Cross-reference w/20110007)
2013 ND 2 Highlight: District court order denying a motion to vacate judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (7). |
Holkesvig v. State (Consolidated w/20120334)
2013 ND 1 Highlight: District court judgment summarily dismissing petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
State v. Baesler (consolidated w/20120296)
2012 ND 262 Highlight: Possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia convictions are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-ref. w/20080082 & 20100058)
2012 ND 261
Highlight: When a person committed as a sexually dangerous individual petitions for discharge, the State has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the committed individual remains a sexually dangerous individual. |
Nuveen v. Nuveen (cross-reference w/20100134 & 20120080)
2012 ND 260
Highlight: When considering an upward deviation in child support a court does not need to find specific needs that the children lack to justify a deviation. |
Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., et al.
2012 ND 259
Highlight: The statutory rules for interpreting indemnity contracts are included in every indemnity contract unless a contrary intention appears in the contract. |
Howard, et al. v. Trotter, et al.
2012 ND 258
Highlight: Congressional section lines are open for public travel without the necessity of any governmental action. |
MayPort Farmers Co-Op v. St. Hilaire Seed Company, Inc.
2012 ND 257
Highlight: Conflicts in the evidence will not be reweighed, and credibility of witnesses will not be reassessed on appeal. |