Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3621 - 3630 of 12359 results
State v. Baesler (consolidated w/20120296)
2012 ND 262 Highlight: Possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia convictions are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-ref. w/20080082 & 20100058)
2012 ND 261
Highlight: When a person committed as a sexually dangerous individual petitions for discharge, the State has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the committed individual remains a sexually dangerous individual. |
Nuveen v. Nuveen (cross-reference w/20100134 & 20120080)
2012 ND 260
Highlight: When considering an upward deviation in child support a court does not need to find specific needs that the children lack to justify a deviation. |
Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., et al.
2012 ND 259
Highlight: The statutory rules for interpreting indemnity contracts are included in every indemnity contract unless a contrary intention appears in the contract. |
Howard, et al. v. Trotter, et al.
2012 ND 258
Highlight: Congressional section lines are open for public travel without the necessity of any governmental action. |
MayPort Farmers Co-Op v. St. Hilaire Seed Company, Inc.
2012 ND 257
Highlight: Conflicts in the evidence will not be reweighed, and credibility of witnesses will not be reassessed on appeal. |
Interest of J.N. (Confidential) (consolidated with 20120390)
2012 ND 256
Highlight: A specific finding that the child is currently deprived is a necessary prerequisite to termination of parental rights under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c). |
Lund v. Lund, et al.
2012 ND 255
Highlight: The phrase "transacting any business in this state" in the long-arm jurisdiction provision under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2)(A) must be given a broad, expansive interpretation. |
Interest of T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross reference with 20110084)
2012 ND 254
Highlight: Unless a statute imposing a time limit declares that the time limit is jurisdictional, the time limit will not be treated as affecting the jurisdiction of a court or administrative agency. |
D.E. v. K.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2012 ND 253
Highlight: A presumption of paternity arises when a man is married to the mother of a child and the child is born during the marriage. |