Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
381 - 390 of 12359 results
Grengs v. Grengs, et al.
2023 ND 239
Highlight: A principal that allows an ostensible agent act with apparent authority may be bound by the agent’s actions. |
Interest of J.M.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 238 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother’s parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Shift Services v. Ames Savage Water Solutions
2023 ND 237
Highlight: Once a contract has been entered into, mutual assent of the contracting parties is essential for any modification of the contract. |
State v. Serdahl
2023 ND 236 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Powell, et al. v. Statoil Oil & Gas
2023 ND 235
Highlight: The obligation to pay royalties under an oil and gas lease is a contract contained in a conveyance or instrument affecting title to real property within the meaning of N.D.C.C. § 28-01-15(2). This ten-year statute of limitations applies to a claim for untimely payment of royalties under an oil and gas lease. |
Ebel, et al. v. Engelhart, et al.
2023 ND 234
Highlight: A district court judgment is reversed because the court misapplied the law by applying the statute of frauds when it was not specifically pled under N.D.R.Civ.P. 8. |
State v. Hamilton
2023 ND 233
Highlight: When a defendant pleads guilty on open and unconditional plea, the defendant waives his right to challenge the rejection of a plea agreement. |
Interest of Wedmore
2023 ND 232 Highlight: An appeal to determine if a person remains a sexually dangerous individual must be taken within 30 days of an entry of an order denying discharge. |
State v. Bearce
2023 ND 231
Highlight: A district court does not err when reducing a defendant’s sentence within the 120-day period mandated by Rule 35(b), N.D.R.Crim.P. |
Sargent Cty. Water Resource District v. Beck, et al.
2023 ND 230
Highlight: Res judicata prevents relitigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in prior actions between the same parties or their privies. Collateral estoppel precludes litigation of issues actually litigated and necessary to the outcome of the prior case, even if such issues are subsequently presented as part of a different claim. Collateral estoppel requires a final judgment on the merits. |