Opinions

State v. Callahan 2024 ND 204
Docket No.: 20240145
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Cruz 2024 ND 203
Docket No.: 20240099
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Sanderson v. Myrdal, et al. 2024 ND 202
Docket No.: 20240091
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed.

A plaintiff may not challenge the court's jurisdiction over a defendant who admitted personal jurisdiction on the basis of defects in the plaintiff's service of process on the defendant.

Generally, a plaintiff may not obtain a default judgment after being served with defendant's answer.

Under Lindke v. Freed, 601 U.S. 187 (2024), a state official's social-media activity constitutes state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the official (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the state's behalf, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when he spoke on social media.

A district court has discretion under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-01(2) to determine whether a claim is frivolous and how much to award, but the district court must award costs and attorney's fees if it finds the claim is frivolous.

Fargo Education Association v. Fargo Public School District 2024 ND 201
Docket No.: 20240151
Filing Date: 11/8/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: School psychologists not "employed primarily as a classroom teacher" are not "teachers" as defined in N.D.C.C. § 15.1-16-01(5).

Hilton v. North Dakota Edu. Ass'n, 2002 ND 209, 655 N.W.2d 60, is overruled to the extent it holds a licensed school district employee who is not an administrator is a teacher irrespective of the employee's assigned teaching duties.

A special education teacher is not a "teacher" within N.D.C.C. ch. 15.1-16 when the teacher is not a school employee. This Court does not hold whether a school district may provide teaching services through independent contractors.

Interest of J.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240257
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of N.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240258
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of B.S. 2024 ND 200
Docket No.: 20240259
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Malloy, et al. v. Behrens 2024 ND 199
Docket No.: 20240071
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 28-21-06(1), when a sheriff receives an execution, the sheriff must satisfy the judgment out of the personal property of the judgment debtor, and if sufficient personal property cannot be found, out of the real property belonging to the debtor.

Applying a statute retroactively results in the attachment of new legal consequences to past matters. Applying a statute prospectively results in the attachment of legal consequences to matters occurring after its effective date. The court must ask whether the new provision attaches new legal consequences to events completed before its enactment.

A debtor is allowed to claim as exempt up to $150,000 of equity in the homestead under N.D.C.C. ch. 47-18. This is accomplished by requiring bids to be more than $150,000 plus the value of liens and encumbrances. See N.D.C.C. §§ 47-18-01 and 47-18-13.

Superior liens are not extinguished by an execution sale. A purchaser of land subject to a mortgage is presumed to have deducted the amount of the senior liens from the amount he bids for the land. A purchaser taking subject to a prior lien is not entitled to an offset for the lien amount.

Kirchmeier v. Monson, et al. 2024 ND 198
Docket No.: 20240075
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Rule 25 of the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure governs substitution when a party dies during district court proceedings. Rule 25 provides a number of requirements that must occur before substitution of a party can be ordered and a case continued.

A conservator's authority terminates when the protected person dies.

State v. White Bird 2024 ND 197
Docket No.: 20240132
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Edison v. Edison 2024 ND 196
Docket No.: 20240119
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: An amended divorce judgment is affirmed.

Adverse rulings alone are not evidence of judicial bias or partiality.

A district court misapplies N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05 when it fails to make a finding on whether two self-employment activities are related.

The plain language of N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05(6) and (7) does not preclude using a loss to reduce income that is related to the self-employment activity that produced the loss. On the other hand, if two self-employment activities are unrelated, then under N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-05(6), a loss resulting from the unrelated self-employment activity could be applied to reduce income from the other self-employment activity only if the monthly gross income, reduced by one-twelfth of the self-employment loss, equals or exceeds the greatest of subsections (a), (b) or (c). If the district court erred in its application of the child support guidelines, then we must examine whether the error was harmless. An error is harmless if it does not affect the outcome of the case or a party's substantial rights. See N.D.R.Civ.P. 61.

Tracy v. Tracy 2024 ND 195
Docket No.: 20240092
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A domestic violence protection order is affirmed.

A district court's finding of domestic violence is a finding of fact that will not be overturned unless it is clearly erroneous. This Court gives great deference to a factfinder's opportunity to observe the witnesses and determine credibility. We will not reverse simply because we may have viewed the evidence differently.

Interest of D.K.A. 2024 ND 194
Docket No.: 20240248
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: An appeal is moot when a determination is sought which, when rendered, cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then-existing controversy. An appeal is not moot if the district court's decision continues to have collateral consequences for the appealing party. If an individual is already subject to firearms restrictions, the court's finding that federal firearms restrictions apply is not a lasting collateral consequence of the order being challenged on appeal.

Santora v. Santora, et al. 2024 ND 193
Docket No.: 20240014
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion to vacate judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), (7), and (8).

Interest of A.J.E. 2024 ND 192
Docket No.: 20240245
Filing Date: 10/24/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Disciplinary Board v. Daniel 2024 ND 191
Docket No.: 20240182
Filing Date: 10/18/2024
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Disbarment
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer disbarment ordered.

Kath v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins. Co., et al. 2024 ND 190
Docket No.: 20240068
Filing Date: 10/10/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: An endorsement is part of the insurance contract. The body of an insurance policy and the endorsements are read as a whole with every attempt to give effect to all of the provisions. When there is a conflict between an endorsement and other policy provisions, the endorsement prevails.

Guardianship and Conservatorship of K.H.P. 2024 ND 189
Docket No.: 20240021
Filing Date: 10/10/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Unless a statute imposing a time limit declares the time limit is jurisdictional, we will not treat the time limit as affecting the jurisdiction of a court or administrative agency.

An issue is not justiciable if it is moot or not ripe for review, a party lacks standing, or resolving it would be advisory.

When petitioning for termination of a guardianship, the ward has the burden of establishing a prima facie case that he is no longer incapacitated. If the ward presents evidence strong enough, if uncontradicted, to support a finding in his favor, he has made a prima facie case.

The review process under N.D.C.C. § 30.1-28-04(5) does not provide the court statutory authority to reappoint an expert examiner. At the time of petitioning for termination in this case, N.D.C.C. § 30.1-28-07(3) (2022) did not give the court statutory authority to reappoint an expert examiner in the termination proceedings, or request an evaluative report and testimony.

After the ward establishes a prima facie case, the guardian has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the ward remains an incapacitated person.

Curtis v. Curtis, et al. 2024 ND 188
Docket No.: 20240115
Filing Date: 10/10/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: An appeal from a district court judgment is dismissed because the appeal was untimely. The time to appeal the judgment was not tolled under N.D.R.App.P. 4(a)(3)(A)(vi) because a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion was not filed and served within 28 days from notice of entry of judgment.

Samaniego v. State 2024 ND 187
Docket No.: 20240090
Filing Date: 10/10/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A prosecutor's question to a law enforcement officer whether, at any point during the officer's investigation, the officer interviewed the defendant did not violate the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights.

A court considering a motion for new trial based on alleged jury misconduct is prohibited from hearing testimony from or receiving declarations of jurors, subject to the exceptions under N.D.R.Ev. 606(b).

State v. Jalloh (consolidated w/20240009) 2024 ND 186
Docket No.: 20240010
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgments entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of tampering with evidence and murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

State v. Jalloh (consolidated w/20240010) 2024 ND 186
Docket No.: 20240009
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgments entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of tampering with evidence and murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Martinez v. State 2024 ND 185
Docket No.: 20240064
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief from the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Woolsey v. State 2024 ND 184
Docket No.: 20240109
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: The Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1, does not apply to juvenile adjudications.

Liberty Petroleum Corp. v. NDIC, et al. 2024 ND 183
Docket No.: 20240022
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Pre-unitization costs of drilling and operating a well, which is now attributed to the unit, reasonably fall within the definition of unit expense. Under unitization, the risk penalty may be recovered out of, and only out of, production from the unit.

A physical taking is where the government requires an owner to suffer a permanent physical invasion of her property. Total regulatory takings occur when regulations completely deprive an owner of all economically beneficial use of her property. Property is subject to the police power of the state to impose such restrictions upon private rights as are practically necessary for the general welfare of all.

The Court accords greater deference to Industrial Commission findings of fact than it ordinarily accords to other administrative agencies' findings of fact. In orders approving a plan of unitization, the Commission made the required findings, and those findings are supported by substantial and credible evidence.

State v. Hoffman 2024 ND 182
Docket No.: 20240095
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Urrabazo v. State 2024 ND 181
Docket No.: 20240085
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Roller 2024 ND 180
Docket No.: 20240051
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: "Willful" conduct is not incongruent with "intentional" conduct. "Willful" conduct includes "intentional" conduct, meaning a person's conduct can be both willful and intentional.

Habitual offender proceedings are sentencing proceedings. Therefore, the rules of evidence do not apply to the court's determination of whether an offender is a habitual offender.

Interest of J.R. 2024 ND 179
Docket No.: 20240207
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(2) and (4).

Interest of T.R. 2024 ND 179
Docket No.: 20240208
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(2) and (4).

Estate of Olson 2024 ND 178
Docket No.: 20240078
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court order dismissing a petition for formal probate for failure to prosecute under N.D.R.Civ.P. 40(e) is reversed because the record does not show a lack of prosecution for more than a year.

Interest of J.M.P. 2024 ND 177
Docket No.: 20240223
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Disciplinary Board v. Merkens (interim Suspension) 2024 ND 176
Docket No.: 20240261
Filing Date: 9/26/2024
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Suspension
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer interim suspended

State v. Rolland 2024 ND 175
Docket No.: 20230313
Filing Date: 9/12/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of a defendant who is not competent to stand trial. A defendant is incompetent when he lacks (1) sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or (2) a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him. The prosecution must show by a preponderance of evidence that a defendant is competent to stand trial.

The fifteen day deadline for a mental health examination under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-04-07 does not begin until receipt of material necessary to examine the fitness of the individual and notice of entry of the order served upon the tier 1a mental health professional.

When factual issues are involved in deciding a pretrial motion in a criminal case, the district court must state its essential findings on the record. A decision cannot be properly reviewed if the district court fails to make adequate findings explaining the basis for its ultimate conclusion.

Interest of W.C.M. 2024 ND 174
Docket No.: 20240213
Filing Date: 9/12/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order requiring continued hospitalization is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Littlebird 2024 ND 173
Docket No.: 20240050
Filing Date: 9/12/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Senske Rentals v. City of Grand Forks 2024 ND 172
Docket No.: 20230397
Filing Date: 9/12/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: The statutes granting cities the power to make special assessments must be strictly construed, and the conditions imposed must be specifically observed and performed.

Section 40-23-07, N.D.C.C., requires a determination of special benefits to each lot. This determination of special benefits must be independent of and without consideration of the improvement project cost in order to satisfy the statutory requirement that the assessment against each lot is "not exceeding the benefits."

We have approved the use of formulas by special assessment commissions to determine the "just proportion" of assessment to each lot and as a factor in determining the amount of benefit received by each lot.

We overrule Holter v. City of Mandan, 2020 ND 152, 946 N.W.2d 524, because it misinterpreted N.D.C.C. § 40-23-07 to the extent it held the statute permitted use of the same formula to determine both the benefit received by a lot and the assessment of costs to that lot.

Mitzel, et al. v. Vogel Law Firm, et al. 2024 ND 171
Docket No.: 20230372
Filing Date: 9/12/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: The elements of a legal malpractice action against an attorney for professional negligence are: 1) the existence of an attorney-client relationship, 2) a duty by the attorney to the client, 3) a breach of that duty by the attorney, and 4) damages to the client proximately caused by the breach of that duty.

When it is alleged that an attorney negligently failed to perform some act on behalf of the client, the plaintiff must allege and prove performance of the act would have benefitted the client.

In a legal malpractice action, the plaintiff has the burden to show damages proximately caused by the breach of the duty owed to the plaintiff. The amount of the damages does not require proof to a degree of mathematical precision; however, the jury must have some factual basis for fixing damages.

Gaddie v. State 2024 ND 170
Docket No.: 20240052
Filing Date: 8/28/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: To establish prosecutorial misconduct, an applicant for postconviction relief must show (1) the prosecutor's actions constitute misconduct, and (2) the misconduct had a prejudicial effect.

North Dakota Rule of Evidence 404(b) requires exclusion of evidence of other acts and crimes committed by the defendant when they are independent of the charged crime and do not fit into the rule's exceptions. Rule 404(b) requires prosecutors to give written notice and explanation if they intend to offer prior bad act evidence.

Knowing introduction of prior bad act evidence coupled with a failure to comply with the Rule 404(b) notice requirement constitutes prosecutorial misconduct.

Admission of evidence of prior sexual misconduct during a criminal prosecution for a sex-related crime creates unique potential for prejudice.

Wollan v. Innovis Health 2024 ND 169
Docket No.: 20240094
Filing Date: 8/28/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A jury's special verdict will be reversed only if it is perverse and clearly contrary to the evidence. The presumption on appeal is that jurors do not intend to return conflicting answers.

Reconciliation of a verdict includes an examination of both the law of the case and the evidence to determine whether the verdict is logical and probable and thus consistent, or whether it is perverse and clearly contrary to the evidence.

Rule 408, N.D.R.Ev., encourages candor during settlement discussions by expanding the common-law rule and rendering inadmissible evidence of conduct or a statement made during compromise negotiations.

Ebel, et al. v. Engelhart, et al. 2024 ND 168
Docket No.: 20240065
Filing Date: 8/28/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A contract requires an offer, an acceptance of an offer, and a mutual acceptance and understanding between the offeror and the offeree as to the terms of the obligation.

When an issue not raised by the pleadings is tried by the parties' express or implied consent, it must be treated in all respects as if raised in the pleadings.

Actual notice of a prior competing interest defeats a good-faith purchaser claim.

To succeed on a claim for intentional interference with contract, a plaintiff must prove (1) a contract existed, (2) the contract was breached, (3) the defendant instigated the breach, and (4) the defendant instigated the breach without justification. The test for proving justification is what is reasonable conduct under all the circumstances of the case. Even where the evidence shows a defendant interfered with a contract, the defendant's actions are justified if they are done for legitimate business concerns and did not maliciously seek to damage the plaintiff.

State v. Miller 2024 ND 167
Docket No.: 20240039
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Restitution must be limited to reasonable damages "directly related" to a criminal offense or expenses sustained as a "direct result" of the defendant's criminal action. There must be an immediate and intimate causal connection between the criminal conduct and the damages or expenses for which restitution is ordered. Extradition costs indirectly related to criminal conduct may not be imposed as restitution.

A district court is generally bound by the terms of a plea agreement it has accepted. After accepting a plea agreement and entering judgment, the court may not add an additional punishment.

Ziemann v. Grosz 2024 ND 166
Docket No.: 20230355
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A denial of summary judgment puts the parties to their proof with a full opportunity to present all of their evidence. If a case goes to trial after a motion for summary judgment is denied, the question of whether the trial court erred in denying summary judgment is moot.

A partnership is an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit. Whether a partnership exists depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. The critical elements of a partnership are (1) an intention to be partners, (2) coownership of the business, and (3) a profit motive.

The determination whether property held in the name of an individual partner belongs to the partnership is a question of fact. The relevant inquiry is whether the partners intended that the property in question be partnership property or individual property.

Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. When a statement within a statement is at issue, each must be admissible on its own.

Interest of W.S., a Child 2024 ND 165
Docket No.: 20240179
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of W.S., a Child 2024 ND 165
Docket No.: 20240180
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Enriquez 2024 ND 164
Docket No.: 20240087
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Possession may be actual or constructive, exclusive or joint and may be shown entirely by circumstantial evidence.

Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-04(9), a firearm means any weapon that will expel, or is readily capable of expelling, a projectile by the action of an explosive.

Bolinske v. Sandstrom, et al. 2024 ND 163
Docket No.: 20230359
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a claim of defamation and awarding attorney's fees is affirmed.

A defamation action must be commenced within two years after the claim for relief has accrued. A cause of action accrues on a defamation claim when the publication of the false statement is made to a third party. The period of limitation for commencement of a defamation action is tolled during the 45-day period allowed in N.D.C.C. § 32-43-06 for responding to a request for correction or clarification. The statutory reference to 90 days in N.D.C.C. § 32-43-03(2) does not provide an additional 90-day tolling period in addition to the 45-day period in N.D.C.C. § 32-43-06.

The district court has discretion under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-01(2) to determine whether a claim is frivolous and how much to award in attorney's fees. The court is considered an expert in determining the amount of attorney's fees. A court is not required to describe its calculations in detail when making its findings regarding attorney's fees as long as this Court is able to discern a basis for the award.

Zundel v. City of Jamestown, et al. 2024 ND 162
Docket No.: 20240080
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Criminal - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Retention of and access to court records is a matter of public interest warranting the exercise of this Court's original jurisdiction.

The judge of a municipal court or a clerk designated by the judge shall be responsible for the administration of all municipal court records in accordance with the records retention schedule.

The retention schedule requires the court to retain permanently a summary of the case or register of actions. A permanent record must be retained indefinitely.

Burleigh Cty. Social Service Bd. v. Rath 2024 ND 161
Docket No.: 20230411
Filing Date: 8/14/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The doctrine of latches does not apply to child support arrearages.

Even if the division of juvenile services has temporary custody of a minor, the child support obligor still owes child support.

The State and obligee have standing to assert a claim for child support arrearages for a child who has reached the age of majority.

The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act does not apply to child support.

Heiser, et al. v. Dahl, et al. 2024 ND 160
Docket No.: 20230323
Filing Date: 8/1/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: To satisfy the elements for adverse possession, the acts on which the claimant relies must be actual, visible, continuous, notorious, distinct, and hostile, and of such character to unmistakably indicate an assertion of claim of exclusive ownership by the occupant.

Section 28-01-11, N.D.C.C., narrows the scope of adverse possession when it is not based on a written instrument to property protected by a substantial enclosure or when it has been usually cultivated or improved.

Possession of real property which is permissive at its inception only becomes adverse when there is a disclaimer of the true owner's title or there are acts of an unequivocal nature by the possessor putting the owner on notice of the hostile nature of the possession.

A claimant's mowing and maintenance are not unmistakable hostile uses of land to support a claim of adverse possession.

To establish a new boundary line by the doctrine of acquiescence, it must be shown by clear and convincing evidence that both parties recognized the line as a boundary for at least 20 years.