Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4061 - 4070 of 12359 results
Carkuff, et al. v. Balmer, et al.
2011 ND 60
Highlight: The language of a deed, if clear and explicit, governs its interpretation, and the parties' mutual intentions must be ascertained from the four corners of the deed, if possible. |
Interest of Vondal
2011 ND 59 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a), a trial court must find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law. |
Nelson v. State
2011 ND 58 Highlight: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is remanded under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3). |
Stephenson v. Stephenson
2011 ND 57
Highlight: All property, including retirement accounts, must be included in a marital estate before the court can determine an equitable property division. |
State v. Christian (consolidated w/20100191 & 20100192)
2011 ND 56
Highlight: Circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to sustain a jury's guilty verdict if the circumstantial evidence has such probative force as to enable the trier of fact to find the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Berger v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2011 ND 55 Highlight: A hearing officer conducting an adjudicative administrative proceeding has broad discretion over the progress and conduct of the hearing, including scheduling and continuing the hearing. |
Silliman v. All American Biodiesel, Inc.
2011 ND 54
Highlight: Res ipsa loquitur for fire damage requires that the accused party had control over the instrumentality that caused the fire, not merely the location of the fire. |
Lund v. Lund
2011 ND 53
Highlight: Whether to grant a continuance lies within the sound discretion of the district court, and its decision to deny a motion for a continuance will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2011 ND 52
Highlight: To preclude discharge from treatment as a sexually dangerous individual, the State must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the committed individual remains a sexually dangerous individual and has serious difficulty controlling his or her behavior. |
Interest of L.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2011 ND 51 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. 25-3.1-15, waiver of a mental health respondent's right to be present at a hearing cannot be found on the basis of only his or her failure to appear at the treatment hearing. |