Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4261 - 4270 of 12382 results
|
Halvorson, et al. v. Starr, et al.
2010 ND 133 Highlight: The computation of time for statutory notice of lapse of mineral interest is governed by N.D.C.C. 1-02-15, not the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure. |
|
State v. Irwin
2010 ND 132 Highlight: A defendant does not suffer a manifest injustice when pleading guilty to a fifth DUI in seven years, although at the time of arrest he has not yet been convicted of his fourth DUI in seven years. |
|
Interest of C.H. (Confidential)
2010 ND 131 Highlight: In determining whether an individual is a "person requiring treatment," a district court must consider (1) whether the individual is "mentally ill," and (2) whether there is a reasonable expectation that, if the individual is not hospitalized, there exists a serious risk of harm to himself, others, or property. |
|
Boeckel v. Boeckel
2010 ND 130 Highlight: Where evidence of domestic violence exists, the district court must make specific and detailed findings regarding the application of the presumption against awarding custody to the perpetrator of domestic violence. |
|
State v. Everett
2010 ND 129 Highlight: Revocation of probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
State v. Colby
2010 ND 128 Highlight: Criminal judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Kuhn
2010 ND 127
Highlight: Lawyer suspended from the practice of law for ninety days and ordered to pay the costs and expenses of the proceeding for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.14, Client With Limited Capacity. |
|
Workforce Safety & Insurance v. Auck
2010 ND 126
Highlight: In an administrative agency case, the factual findings from a final decision by an independent administrative law judge are reviewed under the same standard of review used for agency decisions. The legal conclusions from a final decision by an independent administrative law judge are not entitled to similar deference and are reviewed in the same manner as legal conclusions generally. |
|
Lenton v. Lenton
2010 ND 125
Highlight: When a finding of domestic violence is based solely on fear of physical harm, the fear must be of imminent physical harm. |
|
American Bank Center v. Schuh, et al.
2010 ND 124 Highlight: A party seeking relief from a default judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(i) must make some showing of why he was justified in failing to avoid mistake or inadvertence. |