Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4361 - 4370 of 12097 results
|
Hector, et al. v. City of Fargo
2009 ND 14
Highlight: The decision of a local governing body on whether to amend the city zoning map and growth plan will be affirmed unless the local body acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably, or if there is not sufficient evidence supporting the decision. |
|
Myers v. State (cross-reference 20050368)
2009 ND 13 Highlight: The failure to file a pretrial suppression motion alone is not enough to meet the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel; the petitioner must show actual prejudice. |
|
Citibank v. Reikowski
2009 ND 12 Highlight: Any action or proceeding involving an issue subject to arbitration shall be stayed if an application for stay has been made. |
|
Slorby v. Slorby
2009 ND 11
Highlight: If the language of a judgment is unambiguous and plain, neither construction nor interpretation is allowed, and the effect of the language must be based on the language's literal meaning. |
|
Doepke v. Doepke
2009 ND 10
Highlight: A court errs as a matter of law if it does not comply with the requirements of the child support guidelines when it determines a child support obligation. |
|
City of Fargo v. Lunday
2009 ND 9 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29(a), a defendant in a criminal jury trial must still make a motion for judgment of acquittal to preserve the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence for appeal. |
|
State v. Scutchings
2009 ND 8 Highlight: A prosecutor's comment during closing arguments that the government's evidence is uncontradicted or unrebutted is improper if the only person who could have rebutted the evidence was the defendant testifying on his or her own behalf, and the defendant has chosen not to testify at the trial. |
|
State v. Walstad (Consolidated w/20080272 & 20080273)
2009 ND 7 Highlight: The district court's order denying defendant's motion for credit for time spent in custody is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (2). |
|
State v. Vick
2009 ND 6 Highlight: The district court's second amended judgment denying defendant's motion for additional credit for time spent in custody is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Geray v. Bertsch
2009 ND 5 Highlight: The district court's memorandum opinion and order denying defendant's motion to vacate is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), and plaintiff's request for attorney's fees on appeal is denied under N.D.R.App.P. 38. |