Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4471 - 4480 of 12382 results
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2009 ND 135
Highlight: An issue or argument not raised or considered in the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. |
Chambering of the New Judgeship in the Southeast Judicial District
2009 ND 134 Highlight: New judgeship to be chambered in Jamestown. |
Chambering of the New Judgeship in the Northwest Judicial District
2009 ND 133 Highlight: New judgeship to be chambered in Minot. |
Hill, et al. v. Lindner, et al.
2009 ND 132 Highlight: An incidental business use does not violate a covenant restricting use of property to residential purposes only. |
Reciprocal Discipline of Thoms
2009 ND 131 Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered. |
State v. McAvoy
2009 ND 130
Highlight: A convicted sex offender must register an address with law enforcement within three days of coming into a county in which the individual resides or is temporarily domiciled. |
State v. Zwicke, Jr.
2009 ND 129
Highlight: Under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, law enforcement officers may search for illegal contraband without a warrant when probable cause exists that certain identifiable objects are probably connected with criminal activity and are probably to be found in the vehicle. |
Fehl-Haber v. State (Cross Ref w/20060086)
2009 ND 128 Highlight: District court order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Neva
2009 ND 127 Highlight: A defendant whose previous concurrent sentences are converted into consecutive sentences upon revocation of his probation is entitled to receive credit for the time he spent in custody only toward the first of the converted consecutive sentences. |
Steinmeyer v. Department of Transportation
2009 ND 126
Highlight: Fair administration of an Intoxilyzer test may be established by proof that the method approved by the State Toxicologist for conducting the test has been scrupulously followed. However, 'scrupulous' compliance does not mean 'hypertechnical' compliance. |