Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4471 - 4480 of 12418 results
Estate of Dionne
2009 ND 172
Highlight: The circumstances constituting fraud must be stated in a complaint with particularity. |
Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins., et al.
2009 ND 171
Highlight: When a single-vehicle accident occurs in this state but the injured insured is a resident of another state, the insurance policy was purchased from a company based in the other state and not doing business in this state, and all but the initial treatment occurred in the other state, the laws of the other state will apply in interpreting the insurance policy. |
LaRocque v. State
2009 ND 170 Highlight: District court order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R. App. P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Witzke
2009 ND 169 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Adams
2009 ND 168
Highlight: The right of appeal is governed by statute, and if there is no statutory basis for an appeal, the lack of jurisdiction will be noted and the appeal dismissed. |
State v. Johnson
2009 ND 167
Highlight: If a person ambiguously responds to a request to submit to a chemical test, the person suffers the consequences of that ambiguity. |
Kambeitz, et al. v. Acuity Ins. Co.
2009 ND 166
Highlight: Although the failure to plead an affirmative defense generally results in waiver of the defense, amendments to the pleadings are to be freely given when justice so requires. |
State v. Vandehoven
2009 ND 165
Highlight: The purpose of N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1) is to ensure the defendant understands the constitutional rights which are waived by entry of a guilty plea, to ensure a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and to ensure the defendant understands the maximum possible punishment and any applicable mandatory minimum punishment so he can make a knowing and intelligent decision whether to plead guilty. |
Tweeten v. Tweeten
2009 ND 164 Highlight: A husband and wife's decision to transfer separately owned property to themselves, as husband and wife, as joint tenants is a significant legal act, which may make a premarital agreement governing the distribution of that property inapplicable. |
State v. Schmeets
2009 ND 163 Highlight: To admit evidence of a defendant's prior convictions to establish an object is drug paraphernalia, a court must balance whether the probative value of the evidence outweighs the unfair prejudice to the defendant. |