Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4561 - 4570 of 12359 results
Midthun v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2009 ND 22
Highlight: A party appealing a hearing officer's decision must file reasonably specific specifications of error detailing which matters are at issue, so as to alert the agency, other parties, and the court of the particular errors claimed. |
Adoption of J.D.F. (Confidential)
2009 ND 21 Highlight: A district court must advise parents that they are entitled to representation by counsel, provided by the State if necessary, throughout any proceedings to terminate the parent-child relationship against their will. |
Kelly v. Kelly
2009 ND 20 |
Adoption of H.G.C. (confidential)
2009 ND 19
Highlight: A parent's parental rights, including the right to withhold consent to an adoption, may be terminated if the parent has abandoned the minor child. |
Ulsaker v. White
2009 ND 18
Highlight: A long-term marriage supports an equal distribution of marital property. |
Reinholdt v. ND Dept. of Human Services
2009 ND 17 Highlight: If a Medicaid applicant has a legal ability to obtain an asset, it is considered an actually available resource. In determining whether an asset is actually available, the focus is on the Medicaid applicant's actual and practical ability to obtain the asset as a matter of fact, not of legal fiction. |
Hendrickson v. Olson
2009 ND 16
Highlight: The admissibility of evidence in any adjudicative proceeding before an administrative agency is determined under the rules of evidence unless there is a specific waiver stated orally or in writing before or at the hearing. |
City of Fargo v. Salsman
2009 ND 15
Highlight: A municipality has the authority to bring a nuisance abatement action. |
Hector, et al. v. City of Fargo
2009 ND 14
Highlight: The decision of a local governing body on whether to amend the city zoning map and growth plan will be affirmed unless the local body acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably, or if there is not sufficient evidence supporting the decision. |
Myers v. State (cross-reference 20050368)
2009 ND 13 Highlight: The failure to file a pretrial suppression motion alone is not enough to meet the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel; the petitioner must show actual prejudice. |