Opinions

Sanderson v. Harlow 2009 ND 60
Docket No.: 20080282
Filing Date: 4/30/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order dismissing plaintiff's joint custody action with prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

Ellis v. North Dakota State University 2009 ND 59
Docket No.: 20070005
Filing Date: 4/9/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Equitable estoppel may preclude the application of a statute of limitations by a party whose actions induce another party to not file a claim within a prescribed statutory period.
In balancing the constitutional authority of the Board of Higher Education to remove faculty and employees, the constitutional authority of the legislature and the constitutional limits of review by the judicial branch under separation of powers concepts, the proper standard of review of a substantive Board decision to dismiss an employee for cause is whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proved by the weight of the evidence.

Disciplinary Board v. Nemec (Consolidated w/ 20090078) 2009 ND 58
Docket No.: 20090077
Filing Date: 4/9/2009
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered.

Newman v. State (cross-ref w/20060294) 2009 ND 57
Docket No.: 20080136
Filing Date: 4/8/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author:

Highlight: District court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Black Cloud 2009 ND 56
Docket No.: 20080261
Filing Date: 4/8/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment finding appellant guilty of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Interest of M.W. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2009 ND 55
Docket No.: 20080190
Filing Date: 4/7/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A statute is ambiguous if it is susceptible to meanings that are different, but rational.
Under N.D.C.C. 27-20-34, a juvenile court is to automatically transfer a case involving gross sexual imposition or attempted gross sexual imposition only if the gross sexual imposition or attempted gross sexual imposition charge is "by force or by threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping."

State v. Kunze 2009 ND 54
Docket No.: 20080253
Filing Date: 4/7/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: Criminal judgment for contact by bodily fluids with a law enforcement officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Interest of B.F. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2009 ND 53
Docket No.: 20080140
Filing Date: 4/6/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Double jeopardy bars the State from appealing a juvenile court judge's order rejecting a judicial referee's determination of guilt.

Bergum v. ND Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2009 ND 52
Docket No.: 20080097
Filing Date: 4/6/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A claimant seeking workforce safety and insurance benefits has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the claimant has suffered a compensable injury and is entitled to benefits.
A compensable injury must be established by medical evidence supported by objective medical findings.
It is not a compensable injury when the claimant's employment merely acts to trigger symptoms in a preexisting injury, disease, or other condition unless a claimant's employment substantially accelerates the progression of, or substantially worsens the severity of, the preexisting injury, disease, or other condition.

Langer, et al. v. Pender, et al. 2009 ND 51
Docket No.: 20080115
Filing Date: 4/6/2009
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The primary objective in construing a trust instrument is to ascertain the settlor's intent.
When a trust instrument is unambiguous, the settlor's intent is ascertained from the language of the trust document itself.
General rules of construction of written documents apply to the construction of trust instruments.
Particular clauses of a contract are subordinate to its intent.
When provisions in a contract are irreconcilable, the words which are inconsistent with the contract's nature or with the main intention of the parties are to be rejected.