Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2351 - 2400 of 12382 results
Altru Specialty Services, Inc. v. N.D. Dep't of Human Services, et al.
2017 ND 270 Highlight: The district court does not acquire subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal from an administrative agency decision unless the appellant satisfies statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal. |
Sundance Oil and Gas, LLC v. Hess Corporation
2017 ND 269 Highlight: A district court may not use the findings in an unlocatable mineral owner trust action as res judicata in a subsequent quiet title action to resolve all factual disputes regarding whether a later purchaser was a good-faith purchaser for value. |
State v. Montgomery
2017 ND 268 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Motter, et al. v. Traill Rural Water District
2017 ND 267
Highlight: Raising the decisive issue for a judgment in post-trial briefing can constitute "surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against" sufficient to grant a new trial. |
Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc., et al. (cross-ref. w/20110356)
2017 ND 266
Highlight: Under a Miller-Shugart agreement and judgment, an insured defendant may stipulate for settlement of a plaintiff's claims and stipulate judgment may be collected only from the proceeds of any insurance policy, with no personal liability to the defendant. The stipulated judgment is not conclusive on the insurer. |
State v. Myers (cross-reference w/20130172)
2017 ND 265
Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(a)(2), a sentencing court may correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error. |
Martinson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2017 ND 264
Highlight: Absent a showing of authority, threat, or demand, an officer calling out and running up ahead of person to get their attention does not constitute a seizure implicating the Fourth Amendment. |
Garcia v. State
2017 ND 263 Highlight: A sentencing court must consider a juvenile offender's youth and attendant characteristics before sentencing the juvenile offender to life in prison without the possibility of parole. |
Haugrud v. Craig
2017 ND 262
Highlight: Corporate shareholders and limited liability company members generally have no right to bring actions in their individual names and on their own behalf for a wrong committed against the entity. |
American Express Centurion Bank v. Corum (consolidated w/20170134)
2017 ND 261
Highlight: A party who is not represented by a licensed attorney cannot be represented by another person, including their spouse, in any court of record in this state, absent authorization provided by state law or supreme court rule. |
State v. Sheperd
2017 ND 260
Highlight: Section 12.1-41-06(1)(a), N.D.C.C., does not require the presence of a minor to obtain a conviction. |
Candee, et al. v. Candee
2017 ND 259
Highlight: Parties to an agreement may stipulate as to choice of law. |
State v. Toure (consolidated w/20170039 & 20170040)
2017 ND 258
Highlight: Analysis of a speedy trial claim requires balancing the length of delay, reason for the delay, proper assertion of the right, and actual prejudice to the accused. |
State v. Hojian
2017 ND 257 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of violation of a domestic violence protection order and forgery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Matson (Consolidated w/20170344)
2017 ND 256 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Estate of Feldmann
2017 ND 255
Highlight: The appellate court does not reweigh evidence, reassess witness credibility, or substitute its judgment for the trial court's decision merely because it would have reached a different result. |
Hallin, et al. v. Inland Oil & Gas Corporation
2017 ND 254
Highlight: Oil and gas leases are interpreted in the same manner as contracts. |
Glaser v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2017 ND 253
Highlight: A police officer's testimony regarding the time of driving on his report and notice form may call the time of driving into question but does not rebut the prima facie evidence in the report when the hearing officer relies on additional admissible evidence establishing a time frame for driving. |
State, et al. v. Haskell, et al.
2017 ND 252
Highlight: The Supreme Court exercises its discretionary authority to issue supervisory writs on a case-by-case basis, rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases in which there is no adequate alternative remedy. |
State v. Lark
2017 ND 251 Highlight: Whether probable cause exists is a question of law, fully reviewable on appeal. The test for probable cause is not based on the subjective view of a law enforcement officer, but rather is an objective standard based on the totality of the circumstances. |
Giwa v. State
2017 ND 250
Highlight: A district court may appropriately decline to apply a new rule of criminal procedure retroactively when applying the rule would not prevent manifest injustice and there is no indication the rule was meant to be applied retroactively. |
State v. Crissler
2017 ND 249 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Ev. 701, lay witness testimony is properly admitted when it is based on the witness's perception and is helpful to understanding a fact in issue. |
Interest of P.T.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cons. w/ 20170069 - 20170072)
2017 ND 248 Highlight: When the juvenile court makes insufficient findings of fact, this Court may remand with instructions requiring the juvenile court to make additional findings of fact. |
Interest of B.A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2017 ND 247 Highlight: Firearm restrictions under 18 U.S.C. 922(d)(4) and (g)(4) are a collateral consequence of involuntary commitment orders. Thus, the mootness doctrine does not apply. |
State v. Campbell
2017 ND 246 Highlight: A district court's decisions relating to expert witness testimony will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. |
Berry v. Berry
2017 ND 245
Highlight: A district court's decision whether to grant relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. |
State v. Mayland
2017 ND 244
Highlight: A defendant fails to preserve a jury instruction issue for appellate review when he stipulates to the exclusion of a jury instruction regarding prior convictions. |
Estate of Eagon
2017 ND 243
Highlight: A boilerplate will provision directing payment of "federal and state taxes" from estate assets is not a clear and unambiguous directive that federal estate taxes be apportioned differently from the method provided by the estate tax apportionment statute. |
Brew v. Brew
2017 ND 242
Highlight: The district court is required to equitably distribute marital property in a divorce proceeding, and a property division does not need to be equal to be equitable. |
WSI v. Questar Energy Services, Inc.
2017 ND 241
Highlight: A challenge to Workforce Safety and Insurance employee classifications is a mixed question of law and fact, requiring a review of whether the findings of fact is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and whether those findings support the applied classification. |
Beach Railport, LLC v. Michels, et al.
2017 ND 240
Highlight: District courts have wide judicial discretion in partition actions to do equity and to make a fair and just division of the property or proceeds between the parties, and great flexibility in fashioning appropriate relief for the parties. |
State v. Sahel
2017 ND 239 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after defendant pleaded guilty to gross sexual imposition and terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Clark v. State
2017 ND 238 Highlight: Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Whetsel
2017 ND 237 Highlight: A district court's decisions relating to expert witness testimony will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. |
Wisham v. State
2017 ND 236 Highlight: Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief alleging sentence time calculation error and violation of constitutional rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Wisham v. State
2017 ND 235 Highlight: Order denying a petitioner's application for post-conviction relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 9, ECJD
2017 ND 233 Highlight: The judgeship vacancy created by the retirement of Norman G. Anderson in Fargo is retained. |
Matter of John T. Gassmann Trust
2017 ND 232
Highlight: Res judicata bars the relitigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in earlier actions between the same parties. |
Wilkinson, et al. v. Board of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.
2017 ND 231
Highlight: Chapter 61-33.1, N.D.C.C., governing minerals rights of land inundated by the Pick-Sloan Missouri Project dams, applies retroactively. |
Interest of F.S. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20170298 & 20170299)
2017 ND 230 Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in reopening the record after trial has concluded when the evidence is directly relevant to the matter and a final order has not been issued. |
Baker v. Autos, Inc., et al. (cross-reference w/20140033)
2017 ND 229 Highlight: Certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) should not be routinely granted and is reserved for cases involving unusual circumstances where failure to allow an immediate appeal would create a demonstrated prejudice or hardship. |
Interest of Jane Doe (CONFIDENTIAL)
2017 ND 228 Highlight: A district court ordering Jane Doe's hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Osier (consolidated w/20170042)(cross-ref. w/19960346 & 19980088)
2017 ND 227 Highlight: Order denying motion for relief from the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Doornek (Consolidated w/20170027)
2017 ND 226 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a jury found defendant guilty of one count of theft of property and two counts of assaulting a peace officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. Wagner
2017 ND 225 Highlight: A district court's order denying Wagner's motion to correct an illegal sentence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
State v. Duchaine
2017 ND 224 Highlight: A district court's judgment entered after a jury found Duchaine guilty of burglary is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Phillips v. State (cross-reference w/20130151)
2017 ND 223 Highlight: Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief alleging newly discovered evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Matson
2017 ND 222 Highlight: Lawyer Disbared. |
Disciplinary Board v. Nemec
2017 ND 221 Highlight: Lawyer Disbared. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, NECJD
2017 ND 220 Highlight: Judicial Vacancy Filled. |