Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2501 - 2550 of 12359 results
Saari v. State
2017 ND 94
Highlight: To prevail on a post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner has the heavy burden of proving (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance. |
Everett v. State
2017 ND 93
Highlight: The right of appeal is governed solely by statute in this state, and without any statutory basis to hear an appeal, the Supreme Court must take notice of the lack of jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. |
Goodall, et al. v. Monson, et al.
2017 ND 92
Highlight: A latent ambiguity arises when a writing appears unambiguous on its face, but some collateral matter makes the meaning uncertain. |
Lizakowski v. Lizakowski
2017 ND 91
Highlight: A district court's determination on property division or spousal support will not be set aside for failure to explicitly state the basis for its findings if that basis is reasonably discernable by deduction or inference. |
State v. Howe
2017 ND 90 Highlight: Conviction on two counts of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Schnellbach
2017 ND 89 Highlight: Criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of J.J.A.M. (Confidential)
2017 ND 88 Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Caster
2017 ND 87 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. McAvoy, 2008 ND 204, 9, 757 N.W.2d 394; State v. Wetzel, 2011 ND 218, 11, 806 N.W.2d 193. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, Southeast Judicial District
2017 ND 86 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Jamestown. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, Northeast Judicial District
2017 ND 85 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Rugby. |
Glende v. State
2017 ND 84 Highlight: District court judgment summarily dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rufus v. State
2017 ND 83 Highlight: Order denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
City of Gwinner v. Vincent
2017 ND 82
Highlight: A person arrested for DUI has a limited statutory right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test. |
City of Dickinson v. Schank
2017 ND 81
Highlight: A person arrested for driving or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence has a limited statutory right to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test. |
Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20150133)
2017 ND 80
Highlight: Threats and activity intended to embarrass, annoy, or harass are not constitutionally protected speech. |
State v. Conrad
2017 ND 79
Highlight: Whether the civil dispute doctrine applies in a criminal case is a question of law. |
THR Minerals, LLC. v. Robinson, et al.
2017 ND 78
Highlight: Assignments and deeds are interpreted in the same manner as contracts, with the primary purpose to ascertain and effectuate the parties' or grantor's intent. |
Stewart v. State
2017 ND 77
Highlight: An applicant for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must establish counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and the deficient performance prejudiced the applicant's defense. |
Voigt v. N.D. Public Service Commission, et al.
2017 ND 76
Highlight: Section 38-14.1-21, N.D.C.C., provides for surface coal mining permit approval and denial standards, including protection for statutorily-defined "alluvial valley floors," certain types of valleys with special importance to farming. |
State v. Webster
2017 ND 75
Highlight: An individual may not be criminally prosecuted for refusing a warrantless blood test incident to arrest. |
State v. Ashby
2017 ND 74
Highlight: To justify stopping a moving vehicle for investigation, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion a motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
Carroll v. Carroll
2017 ND 73
Highlight: A district court's decision whether to vacate a judgment or grant a new trial rests entirely within the its discretion. |
Nandan, LLP, et al. v. City of Fargo (cross-ref. w/20140121)
2017 ND 72
Highlight: Summary judgment generally is an appropriate method for resolving statutory construction issues. |
Estate of Vendsel (consolidated w/20160164)
2017 ND 71
Highlight: A self-represented litigant is subject to the rules of appellate procedure and has a duty to bring to the court's attention the proper rules of law that apply to a case. |
State v. Belgarde
2017 ND 70
Highlight: The starting point for whether a late alibi notice should be excused under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12.1(d) is some showing of good cause by the defendant to justify an exception. |
Gaede v. Bertsch
2017 ND 69
Highlight: Section 23-06-03, N.D.C.C., requires a deceased inmate's county of residence to arrange for and supervise the deceased inmate's burial only if the inmate does not have a surviving spouse or kindred and did not leave sufficient means to pay the funeral expenses. |
A. R. Audit Services, Inc. v. Tuttle
2017 ND 68 Highlight: On review of a summary judgment, if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from the facts, issues of fact may become issues of law. |
Gagnon v. Gagnon
2017 ND 67 Highlight: If the district court finds credible evidence of domestic violence exists, it is the predominate factor to be considered in a primary residential responsibility decision. |
Myers v. State (cross-reference w/20150223)
2017 ND 66 Highlight: An applicant who inexcusably fails to raise all claims in a single postconviction relief proceeding misuses the postconviction relief process by filing a subsequent application raising issues that could have been raised in the earlier proceeding. |
Roe v. State
2017 ND 65 Highlight: A victim's recantation does not by itself make her initial allegation of sexual abuse implausible or incredible, because she may have a variety of reasons to testify in apparent conflict with her prior statement. |
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagar
2017 ND 64 Highlight: A judge may be suspended without pay for violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. |
Thompson v. State (cross-reference w/20150157)
2017 ND 63 Highlight: A district court order entered on remand denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Russell
2017 ND 62 Highlight: Criminal judgments entered after a jury found defendant guilty of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Matter of Wegley
2017 ND 61 Highlight: A district court order continuing civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Evans v. State
2017 ND 59 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Follman v. Follman
2017 ND 58 Highlight: A district court amended judgment awarding primary residential responsibility to the father and order denying a motion for continuance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
EduCap, Inc. v. Elder, et al.
2017 ND 57 Highlight: A district court's orders denying a request for relief from judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(d) and a motion to reconsider are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Kaul
2017 ND 56
Highlight: An investigative stop must be justified by reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity. |
Ueckert v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2017 ND 55 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming the Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7); Beylund v. Levi, 2017 ND 30. |
Hamilton v. State
2017 ND 54
Highlight: A district court's erroneous construction and application of N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 52, § 2(D) and (E) amounted to harmless error. |
O'Hara v. Schneider
2017 ND 53
Highlight: Where the initial order establishing primary residential responsibility or parenting time included consideration of a pattern of domestic violence, a new domestic violence act by the same parent satisfies the "material change" prong as a matter of law. |
City of Grand Forks v. Opp
2017 ND 52
Highlight: A defendant is limited on appeal to issues raised in motion for new trial. |
State v. White
2017 ND 51 Highlight: A probationary search, supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of supervised probation, is reasonable and does not violate the probationer's constitutional rights. |
Jalbert v. Eagle Rigid Spans, Inc.
2017 ND 50
Highlight: A trial court's decision to grant or deny a new trial for an excessive damage verdict is discretionary and will not be overturned unless an abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. It is presumed that a damage verdict is proper, and this presumption is overcome only when the jury's verdict is so excessive that it shocks the conscience of the court. |
Nelson v. McAlester Fuel Company, et al.
2017 ND 49
Highlight: The statutory procedure in N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1 allowing a surface owner to acquire abandoned mineral interests is a separate, distinct procedure from a subsequent quiet title action. |
Mitzel v. Larson
2017 ND 48
Highlight: A party may waive a personal jurisdiction argument by voluntarily submitting to the personal jurisdiction of the district court. |
Broten, et al. v. Broten (cross-reference w/20140177)
2017 ND 47
Highlight: An unjust enrichment claim is fully reviewable on appeal, and the essential element in recovering under the theory is the receipt of a benefit by the defendant from the plaintiff which would be inequitable to retain without paying for its value. |
State v. Borden
2017 ND 46 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault, and menacing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Environmental Driven Solutions v. Dunn County, et al.
2017 ND 45 Highlight: A county has no authority through its zoning regulations to veto the Industrial Commission's siting of an oil and gas waste treating plant. |
Interest of A.D. (Confidential)
2017 ND 44 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |