Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
511 - 520 of 12359 results
|
Hegenes Apartment Management v. Borlay, et al.
2023 ND 123 |
|
Interest of C.A.S.
2023 ND 122
Highlight: An appeal from a decision terminating parental rights must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment. The North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure do not authorize an extension. An appeal not filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. |
|
State v. Brame
2023 ND 121
Highlight: District courts must substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters a guilty plea. |
|
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 120 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings regarding whether a material change in circumstances resulted in a general decline or adversely affected the children in order to modify primary residential responsibility. |
|
State v. Noble (consolidated w/20220364)
2023 ND 119 Highlight: When the sufficiency of evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged, the record is reviewed on appeal to determine if there is competent evidence allowing the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting a conviction. |
|
State v. Noble (consolidated w/20220364)
2023 ND 119 |
|
Interest of I.C.
2023 ND 118 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Laducer v. Laducer, et al.
2023 ND 117 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to review and amend child support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (8). |
|
State v. Gardner
2023 ND 116
Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted defendant of child abuse in violation of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-22 is affirmed. |
|
State v. Coons
2023 ND 115
Highlight: A closure may occur where some or all members of the public are precluded from perceiving contemporaneously what is transpiring in the courtroom, because they can neither see nor hear what is going on. When questioning occurs at the bench, the public can still observe the proceedings, thus furthering the values that the public trial right is designed to protect, and can hear the general questions posed to the jury panel. |