Opinions

Mastrony v. Mastrony 2005 ND 165
Docket No.: 20050002
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Not Available

Highlight: Divorce judgment awarding custody and dividing the marital estate is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Eagleman v. State (Cross-Ref. w/20030149) 2005 ND 164
Docket No.: 20040359
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Leftbear 2005 ND 163
Docket No.: 20050042
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment following a conviction for aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Allen 2005 ND 162
Docket No.: 20050102
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

M.S.B. v. J.M.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2005 ND 161
Docket No.: 20050075
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment establishing physical custody of a minor child is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Oie 2005 ND 160
Docket No.: 20050031
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in accepting a guilty plea when the factual basis is established through open court inquiry and review of the pre-sentence investigation report.

State v. Moore 2005 ND 159
Docket No.: 20050133
Filing Date: 9/27/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of motion to correct illegal sentence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

Guardianship/Conservatorship of Onstad 2005 ND 158
Docket No.: 20040235
Filing Date: 9/26/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: While N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) ordinarily may not be used as a substitute for an appeal or to relieve a party from deliberate choices, in unusual cases a party who has not taken an appeal may obtain relief on a 60(b) motion.
A successor judge should respect the law of the case.

Interest of K.G. (Confidential) 2005 ND 156
Docket No.: 20050266
Filing Date: 8/31/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court's finding, that no less restrictive treatment programs other than hospitalization are appropriate, will not be reversed unless it is clearly erroneous.

Amerada Hess Corp., et al. v. Fong 2005 ND 155
Docket No.: 20040378
Filing Date: 8/31/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Tax Realted
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Gross-up amounts are not "foreign dividends" subject to partial exclusion under state tax law.
The rule of strict construction of ambiguous tax statutes in favor of the taxpayer is a rule of last resort when other means of ascertaining the legislature's intentions have failed.
An administrative agency need not use the rulemaking process to collect an erroneous interpretation of a statute.
While there may be a public desire to avoid double taxation as a matter of public policy, there is no constitutional prohibition against double taxation.