Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5491 - 5500 of 12358 results
State v. Mooney (Consolidated w/ 20040181 & 20040182)
2005 ND 6 Highlight: Three criminal judgments are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Miller v. Sprynczynatyk
2005 ND 5 Highlight: A judgment affirming an administrative agency decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Pautz v. N.B., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2005 ND 4 Highlight: An order finding a child unruly is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |
State v. Rupp
2005 ND 3 Highlight: Conviction of attempted aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Jackson-Metcalf
2005 ND 2 Highlight: A revocation of probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Greybull v. State
2005 ND 1 Highlight: An appeal from dismissal of a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Spectrum Care, L.L.C. v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
2004 ND 229 Highlight: Section 65-04-32, N.D.C.C., applies to an employer's challenge to the classification of its employees for purposes of establishing insurance premiums payable to Workforce Safety and Insurance, and a court's review of a decision regarding those classifications is under sections 28-32-46 and 28-32-49, N.D.C.C. |
State v. Steen (Consolidated w/20040052)
2004 ND 228 Highlight: To prevail in a post-conviction proceeding on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must show not only that trial counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, but must also demonstrate prejudice by establishing a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the trial would have been different. |
Gibb v. Sepe
2004 ND 227
Highlight: A spousal support award resulting from the parties' stipulation should be modified by the trial court only upon a showing of a material change in circumstances. |
Foster v. Foster
2004 ND 226
Highlight: A custody determination should be based on the best interests of the child and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous. |