Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2801 - 2850 of 12359 results
Haag v. Haag
2016 ND 34
Highlight: A material change of circumstances is an important new fact not known at the time of the prior order establishing residential responsibility. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al. (cross-reference w/ 20130217)
2016 ND 33 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a), a court may correct a clerical mistake or mistake arising from oversight or omission when one is found in a judgment, but may not make substantive changes in a judgment. |
Estate of Vaage
2016 ND 32
Highlight: Evidence justifying reformation of a written instrument must be clear, specific, and convincing. |
State v. McClary
2016 ND 31
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence brought under the Rules of Criminal Procedure or brought under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act should be treated as equivalent to a motion under both provisions. |
Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of Williston, et al.
2016 ND 30
Highlight: Granting or denying a preliminary injunction is based on: (1) substantial probability of succeeding on the merits; (2) irreparable injury; (3) harm to other interested parties; and (4) effect on the public interest. |
Interest of Johnson (cross-reference w/ 20120364 & 20140366)
2016 ND 29 Highlight: A district court must find a person has serious difficulty controlling his or her behavior to continue that person's commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. |
State v. Anderson
2016 ND 28
Highlight: The State cannot use a defendant's post-arrest silence as evidence of guilt, and the burden is on the State to prove that a comment on a defendant's post-arrest silence is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/ 20150165)
2016 ND 27 Highlight: Murder conviction and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3); case remanded to fix clerical error in judgment. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&2014
2016 ND 26 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&20140034)
2016 ND 25 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 24 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Gomez v. State
2016 ND 23 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Benson v. State (cross-reference w/20130179)
2016 ND 22 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, SEJD (see 20160011)
2016 ND 21 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Jamestown and Valley City. |
PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al.
2016 ND 20
Highlight: A party that acts as a "mere conduit" for a transfer of funds is not a "first transferee" for purposes of liability under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. |
Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 19
Highlight: A proponent may introduce into evidence a summary to prove the content of voluminous writings that cannot be conveniently examined in court. |
Estate of Glasoe, et al. v. Williams County, ND, et al.
2016 ND 18
Highlight: There must be strict compliance with mandatory jurisdictional requirements of the tax lien foreclosure statutes, and those statutes will be strictly construed in favor of the owners of the property. |
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 17
Highlight: Generally, the existence of a duty is a preliminary question of law for the court. When a duty does not exist, there is no negligence. |
Ritter v. Ritter
2016 ND 16 Highlight: A parent may establish a prima facie case for modification of residential responsibility following a stipulated divorce when the parent's affidavit evidences a significant change in employment resulting in a predictable work schedule and such modification is in the children's best interests. |
State v. Knox
2016 ND 15 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court fails to make adequate findings explaining the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision. |
Wanttaja v. Wanttaja
2016 ND 14
Highlight: A district court has jurisdiction in divorce proceedings to award appropriate child support for a parties' child, even when a temporary support order has been entered by a district court in another county while the parties are still married. |
State v. Atkins
2016 ND 13
Highlight: Issues not brought before the district court are generally inappropriate for appeal. |
Forster v. Flaagan
2016 ND 12
Highlight: A prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility is a bare minimum standard requiring facts that would support modification if proven at an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Hannah
2016 ND 11
Highlight: Pain is a phenomenon of common experience and understanding. |
State v. Horning
2016 ND 10
Highlight: The State may move for civil forfeiture of property within a criminal case. |
State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, et al. (cross-ref. w/20140444)
2016 ND 9
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion when it does not follow the procedural requirement of providing notice before amending an order or judgment to correct a clerical error. |
State v. Ballard
2016 ND 8 Highlight: Suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer's home is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. |
State v. Russell
2016 ND 7 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment revoking defendant's probation and sentencing him to prison is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Sturre v. Levi
2016 ND 6 Highlight: Judgment affirming the Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 180 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Myers v. State
2016 ND 5 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
State v. Suelzle
2016 ND 4 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault, aggravated reckless driving, reckless endangerment, leaving the scene of an accident involving serious personal injury, leaving the scene of an accident involving an unattended vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident involving an attended vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Johnson v. State
2016 ND 3 Highlight: Denial of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, NEJD
2016 ND 2 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Devils Lake. |
Stock v. Stock
2016 ND 1
Highlight: It is not clearly erroneous for a court to award permanent spousal support instead of rehabilitative spousal support where the circumstances warrant both awards. |
Markgraf, et al. v. Welker, et al.
2015 ND 303
Highlight: Summary judgment is inappropriate if the court must draw inferences and make findings on disputed facts to support the judgment. |
Arrow Midstream Holdings, LLC, et al. v. 3 Bears Construction, LLC, et al.
2015 ND 302
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is final and appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
State v. Nelson (consolidated w/ 20150213)
2015 ND 301
Highlight: Restitution hearings are required when a defendant has pled guilty and the amount of restitution is in dispute or uncertain. |
Clark v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins., et al.
2015 ND 300
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal. |
Washburn v. Levi
2015 ND 299
Highlight: If an arrestee makes any affirmative mention of a need for an attorney before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, law enforcement personnel must assume the arrestee is requesting an opportunity to consult with an attorney and must allow a reasonable opportunity to do so. |
Bayles v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 298
Highlight: A district court may not reverse a hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges when the only basis was failure to file the transcript within the statutory period. |
State v. Williams
2015 ND 297 Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a request for a transcript, and the court abuses its discretion by refusing the request if a particularized need, necessity, or justification for its preparation and use is shown. |
State v. Chatman
2015 ND 296
Highlight: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant, but a court is not required to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search warrant if there was sufficient legal evidence presented to the issuing magistrate to establish probable cause. |
Interest of Thill (cross-reference w/ 20130291)
2015 ND 295 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings of fact supporting its determination that a defendant remains a sexually dangerous individual. Generally referencing medical reports without explaining which facts it considered in its determination is not sufficient. |
Butterfield v. Levi
2015 ND 294 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20150318)
2015 ND 293 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Musick v. Levi
2015 ND 292 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Jodoin v. Levi
2015 ND 291 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Johnson v. State
2015 ND 290 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Ward
2015 ND 289 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Disciplinary Board v. Varriano
2015 ND 288 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |