Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2801 - 2850 of 12418 results
State v. Rogahn
2016 ND 93
Highlight: Probable cause depends on the combined effect of all facts and circumstances included in the affidavit of probable cause, not the isolated effect of individual facts or circumstances. |
State v. Timm
2016 ND 92 Highlight: DUI conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of N.A. (Confidential)
2016 ND 91
Highlight: In termination of parental rights cases, a guardian ad litem's failure to interview an available parent is error. |
State, et al. v. Andres
2016 ND 90
Highlight: When a district court grants primary residential responsibility, it must calculate child support obligations for each parent assuming the other parent has primary residential responsibility for the child. |
Interest of Thill (cross-reference w/ 20130291 & 20150147)
2016 ND 89 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Trower
2016 ND 88 Highlight: Possession of stolen property and fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer convictions summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Schmuck v. Schmuck
2016 ND 87
Highlight: In determining whether to award spousal support, a party's need for support is not dispositive, and the district court must also consider whether the other party has an ability to pay. |
Kapple v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 86 Highlight: A district court judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer's decision revoking driving privileges is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
The Next Step v. Redmon
2016 ND 85 Highlight: Unless an exception applies, an unincorporated associations are incapable of holding title to real property because they are not legal entities. |
Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLC
2016 ND 84
Highlight: When an oil and gas lease does not provide how the parties may modify its terms, the parties may alter the lease by a contract in writing, or by an executed oral agreement, and not otherwise. |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref w/ 20130025, 20130184, 20130327, 20140012, 20140291,
2016 ND 83
Highlight: Technical violations of a divorce judgment do not necessitate a finding of contempt. |
Gray v. Berg
2016 ND 82
Highlight: A party claiming bias must present more than general allegations amounting to nothing more than dissatisfaction with unfavorable court rulings. |
Langwald v. Langwald
2016 ND 81
Highlight: In a divorce proceeding, a district court's valuation and distribution of marital property will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Schmidt v. Levi
2016 ND 80
Highlight: North Dakota's implied consent and criminal refusal laws are constitutional. |
City of Fargo v. Rakowski
2016 ND 79
Highlight: A city has discretion to decide how to implement laws that promote public safety. |
Everett v. State
2016 ND 78
Highlight: An application for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years of the date the conviction becomes final, unless an exception applies. |
Gillmore v. Levi
2016 ND 77
Highlight: Whether a driver has voluntarily consented to field sobriety testing is not an issue for consideration in an administrative proceeding to suspend driving privileges. |
Larson v. Larson
2016 ND 76
Highlight: A district court may modify primary residential responsibility if it finds: (1) a material change in circumstances has occurred; and (2) a modification is necessary to serve the child's best interests. |
State v. Peltier
2016 ND 75 Highlight: Admitting evidence of sexual history for impeachment for a prior inconsistent statement requires an inconsistent statement. |
Lumley, et al. v. Kapusta
2016 ND 74
Highlight: The existence of an oral contract and its terms are questions of fact that will not be overturned on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. |
Capital Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. N.D. Public Service Commission, et al.
2016 ND 73
Highlight: Appellate review of Commission findings of fact is limited to whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proven by the weight of the evidence from the entire record. |
State v. O'Connor
2016 ND 72 Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a defendant a complete chemical test implied consent advisory after the defendant's arrest and before his submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding under the implied consent laws. |
Rath v. Rath
2016 ND 71
Highlight: Due process dictates a decision to deviate from standard trial practices requires more than conclusory justifications. |
Welch Construction & Excavating, LLC v. Duong
2016 ND 70
Highlight: A party claiming breach of contract must prove the existence of a contract, a breach of the contract, and damages flowing from the breach. |
Schurmann v. Schurmann
2016 ND 69
Highlight: To modify parenting time, the moving party must demonstrate a material change in circumstances has occurred since entry of the previous parenting time order and the modification is in the best interests of the child. |
State v. James
2016 ND 68
Highlight: To justify stopping a moving vehicle for investigation, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion a motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
Matter of K.J.C. (Confidential)
2016 ND 67
Highlight: In termination of parental rights proceedings, the custodial parent's refusal to cooperate with the noncustodial parent's attempts to maintain a relationship with the child is not insignificant in deciding whether the noncustodial parent abandoned the child, but the noncustodial parent must take affirmative steps to perform parental duties and foster a relationship with the child. |
4APM, LLP v. TCI Insurance Agency, Inc.
2016 ND 66
Highlight: Generally, an insurance agent's duty of care to an insured requires the agent to act in good faith and follow instructions. |
State v. Costa
2016 ND 65 Highlight: Counsel may not comment on facts not in evidence during closing argument, and a prosecutor may not vouch for evidence during closing argument. |
Cudmore v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 64
Highlight: Before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, an individual has a qualified statutory right to consult with an attorney. |
State v. Keller
2016 ND 63 Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion by refusing to give jury instructions that inadequately and inaccurately reflect the law. |
Curtiss v. State (cross-ref. w/20150007)
2016 ND 62
Highlight: The applicant in a post-conviction relief case has the burden of establishing grounds for relief. |
Degnan v. Degnan
2016 ND 61
Highlight: A district court does not abuse its discretion in granting spousal support and attorney's fee awards in amounts less than the requesting spouse's alleged need. |
Werven v. Werven
2016 ND 60
Highlight: Modification of spousal support is not warranted when the change in a party's financial circumstances is self-induced. |
State v. Putney
2016 ND 59
Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
City of Grand Forks v. Gale
2016 ND 58
Highlight: Delay attributable to an accused's purposeful evasion of prosecution may not result in a speedy trial violation, but the accused have no duty to bring themselves to trial. |
Martire' v. Martire' (cross ref 20110253, 20110197)
2016 ND 57
Highlight: Even when it is undisputed an obligor's net monthly income exceeds the income maximum under the Child Support Guidelines, the district court must determine the obligor's net income before it determines the appropriate upward deviation from the presumptive guideline amount. |
Woody v. Pembina County Annual Fair and Exhibition Association
2016 ND 56
Highlight: Owner of land inviting the public to use its property for recreational purposes without charge is protected from liability under N.D.C.C. ch. 53-08. |
State v. Quantz
2016 ND 55 Highlight: Convictions for disorderly conduct and indecent exposure are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(3). |
Eagleman v. State
2016 ND 54
Highlight: Applicants for post-conviction relief are not entitled to relief when their claims have been rejected in prior proceedings. |
State v. Mann
2016 ND 53
Highlight: North Dakota's criminal refusal statute is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment and North Dakota Constitution article I, section 8. |
Matuska v. State
2016 ND 52 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Odermann
2016 ND 51 Highlight: A criminal judgment for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of C.S. (Confidential)
2016 ND 50 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Erickstad v. State
2016 ND 49 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7). |
Vogt v. State
2016 ND 48 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Aker v. Neiber
2016 ND 47 Highlight: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref. 20130025, 184 & 252; 20140012 & 291)
2016 ND 46
Highlight: A district court's decision on whether a contempt has been committed and remedial sanctions are warranted lies within its sound discretion and will not be overturned on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. |
Kittleson, et al. v. Grynberg Petroleum Company, et al.
2016 ND 44
Highlight: If a specific provision and a general provision in a contract conflict, the specific ordinarily prevails over the general. |
Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Koller, et al.
2016 ND 43
Highlight: Whether an individual is a resident of a named insured's household for the purposes of an automobile insurance policy is a question of fact and technical notions of legal residence are not controlling. |