Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2801 - 2850 of 12382 results
City of Grand Forks v. Gale
2016 ND 58
Highlight: Delay attributable to an accused's purposeful evasion of prosecution may not result in a speedy trial violation, but the accused have no duty to bring themselves to trial. |
Martire' v. Martire' (cross ref 20110253, 20110197)
2016 ND 57
Highlight: Even when it is undisputed an obligor's net monthly income exceeds the income maximum under the Child Support Guidelines, the district court must determine the obligor's net income before it determines the appropriate upward deviation from the presumptive guideline amount. |
Woody v. Pembina County Annual Fair and Exhibition Association
2016 ND 56
Highlight: Owner of land inviting the public to use its property for recreational purposes without charge is protected from liability under N.D.C.C. ch. 53-08. |
State v. Quantz
2016 ND 55 Highlight: Convictions for disorderly conduct and indecent exposure are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(3). |
Eagleman v. State
2016 ND 54
Highlight: Applicants for post-conviction relief are not entitled to relief when their claims have been rejected in prior proceedings. |
State v. Mann
2016 ND 53
Highlight: North Dakota's criminal refusal statute is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment and North Dakota Constitution article I, section 8. |
Matuska v. State
2016 ND 52 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Odermann
2016 ND 51 Highlight: A criminal judgment for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of C.S. (Confidential)
2016 ND 50 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Erickstad v. State
2016 ND 49 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7). |
Vogt v. State
2016 ND 48 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Aker v. Neiber
2016 ND 47 Highlight: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rath v. Rath (cross ref. 20130025, 184 & 252; 20140012 & 291)
2016 ND 46
Highlight: A district court's decision on whether a contempt has been committed and remedial sanctions are warranted lies within its sound discretion and will not be overturned on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. |
Kittleson, et al. v. Grynberg Petroleum Company, et al.
2016 ND 44
Highlight: If a specific provision and a general provision in a contract conflict, the specific ordinarily prevails over the general. |
Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Koller, et al.
2016 ND 43
Highlight: Whether an individual is a resident of a named insured's household for the purposes of an automobile insurance policy is a question of fact and technical notions of legal residence are not controlling. |
Williston Education Association v. Williston Public School Dist. No. 1
2016 ND 42
Highlight: Agreements between teacher associations and school boards must be read in light of the comprehensive statutory framework governing those relations. |
Annexation of a Part of Lewis & Clark Public School District
2016 ND 41
Highlight: A school district may be adversely affected by an annexation decision that causes the district to lose land or gain unwanted land. |
Brouillet v. Brouillet
2016 ND 40
Highlight: A district court's award of primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous or it is not sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
State v. Reddig
2016 ND 39
Highlight: A defendant may not be convicted upon the testimony of an accomplice unless the testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime. |
Sand v. Job Service, et al.
2016 ND 38
Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 and 60 are not applicable to an administrative agency appeal to a district court. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al. (cross-reference w/20140066)
2016 ND 37
Highlight: An unrecorded instrument is valid between the parties to the instrument and those with notice. |
Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a Hansen (cross-reference w/20120329 & 20150030)
2016 ND 36
Highlight: An appellant may not collaterally attack an earlier unappealed decision. |
State v. Goodale
2016 ND 35
Highlight: When a default judgment is entered, the defendant may move for relief from the default judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b). |
Haag v. Haag
2016 ND 34
Highlight: A material change of circumstances is an important new fact not known at the time of the prior order establishing residential responsibility. |
Erickson v. Olsen, et al. (cross-reference w/ 20130217)
2016 ND 33 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(a), a court may correct a clerical mistake or mistake arising from oversight or omission when one is found in a judgment, but may not make substantive changes in a judgment. |
Estate of Vaage
2016 ND 32
Highlight: Evidence justifying reformation of a written instrument must be clear, specific, and convincing. |
State v. McClary
2016 ND 31
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence brought under the Rules of Criminal Procedure or brought under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act should be treated as equivalent to a motion under both provisions. |
Black Gold Oil Field Services, LLC v. City of Williston, et al.
2016 ND 30
Highlight: Granting or denying a preliminary injunction is based on: (1) substantial probability of succeeding on the merits; (2) irreparable injury; (3) harm to other interested parties; and (4) effect on the public interest. |
Interest of Johnson (cross-reference w/ 20120364 & 20140366)
2016 ND 29 Highlight: A district court must find a person has serious difficulty controlling his or her behavior to continue that person's commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. |
State v. Anderson
2016 ND 28
Highlight: The State cannot use a defendant's post-arrest silence as evidence of guilt, and the burden is on the State to prove that a comment on a defendant's post-arrest silence is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. |
State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/ 20150165)
2016 ND 27 Highlight: Murder conviction and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3); case remanded to fix clerical error in judgment. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&2014
2016 ND 26 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100230,20120175,&20140034)
2016 ND 25 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of N.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 24 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Gomez v. State
2016 ND 23 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Benson v. State (cross-reference w/20130179)
2016 ND 22 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 7, SEJD (see 20160011)
2016 ND 21 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Jamestown and Valley City. |
PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al.
2016 ND 20
Highlight: A party that acts as a "mere conduit" for a transfer of funds is not a "first transferee" for purposes of liability under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. |
Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 19
Highlight: A proponent may introduce into evidence a summary to prove the content of voluminous writings that cannot be conveniently examined in court. |
Estate of Glasoe, et al. v. Williams County, ND, et al.
2016 ND 18
Highlight: There must be strict compliance with mandatory jurisdictional requirements of the tax lien foreclosure statutes, and those statutes will be strictly construed in favor of the owners of the property. |
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 17
Highlight: Generally, the existence of a duty is a preliminary question of law for the court. When a duty does not exist, there is no negligence. |
Ritter v. Ritter
2016 ND 16 Highlight: A parent may establish a prima facie case for modification of residential responsibility following a stipulated divorce when the parent's affidavit evidences a significant change in employment resulting in a predictable work schedule and such modification is in the children's best interests. |
State v. Knox
2016 ND 15 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court fails to make adequate findings explaining the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision. |
Wanttaja v. Wanttaja
2016 ND 14
Highlight: A district court has jurisdiction in divorce proceedings to award appropriate child support for a parties' child, even when a temporary support order has been entered by a district court in another county while the parties are still married. |
State v. Atkins
2016 ND 13
Highlight: Issues not brought before the district court are generally inappropriate for appeal. |
Forster v. Flaagan
2016 ND 12
Highlight: A prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility is a bare minimum standard requiring facts that would support modification if proven at an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Hannah
2016 ND 11
Highlight: Pain is a phenomenon of common experience and understanding. |
State v. Horning
2016 ND 10
Highlight: The State may move for civil forfeiture of property within a criminal case. |
State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, et al. (cross-ref. w/20140444)
2016 ND 9
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion when it does not follow the procedural requirement of providing notice before amending an order or judgment to correct a clerical error. |
State v. Ballard
2016 ND 8 Highlight: Suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer's home is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. |