Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5771 - 5780 of 12359 results
State v. Zephyrin
2003 ND 155 Highlight: Criminal convictions for robbery, felonious restraint, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4) and (7). |
Iglehart v. Iglehart
2003 ND 154 Highlight: Summary judgment is appropriate in a negligence action when the record indicates the defendant did not owe a duty to the plaintiff and was not negligent. |
State v. Ballweg (consolidated w/20030052 & 20030053)
2003 ND 153
Highlight: Facts in a search warrant affidavit are not misleading if there was no reckless or deliberate falsity nor omitted information that would have negated probable cause. |
Disciplinary Board v. Edin
2003 ND 152 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Interest of Z.C.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2003 ND 151
Highlight: A minor is not in custody and is not entitled to representation by his parents when he is asked common sense investigatory questions during a routine traffic stop. |
Torgerson v. Torgerson
2003 ND 150
Highlight: An obligor need not show a material change in circumstances if the motion to modify child support is brought more than one year after entry of the support order. |
United Valley Bank v. Lamb, et al.
2003 ND 149
Highlight: Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P., authorizes the court to award just damages and single or double costs, including attorney's fees for a frivolous appeal. |
Lamb v. Riemers
2003 ND 148 Highlight: Unless a contract specifically provides otherwise, the seller may retain earnest money only if the buyer breaches the agreement. |
Guardianship of Shatzka
2003 ND 147 Highlight: If a guardian is not appointed, the person for whom guardianship was sought may not be required to pay for a court-appointed visitor, lawyer, physician or temporary guardian. |
Krank v. Krank
2003 ND 146 Highlight: In making its custody decision, the trial court is not required to make specific findings of fact on each factor under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1), but the court should consider all relevant factors in making the decision. |