Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5771 - 5780 of 12382 results
Kamara v. State
2003 ND 179
Highlight: To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a person must show counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and the deficient performance prejudiced him. |
Negaard v. Negaard (cross-ref. w/20010251)
2003 ND 178 Highlight: Post-judgment divorce order granting costs and attorney's fees summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (7). |
Elshaug v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. (cross-reference 990286)
2003 ND 177
Highlight: A claimant has the burden of proving a right to receive workers compensation benefits or to continued benefits if they are terminated after liability for a claim has been accepted. |
Knodel v. Knodel
2003 ND 176 Highlight: Divorce judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Hanson v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Trans.
2003 ND 175
Highlight: Weaving twice onto the lane-dividing line on an interstate highway, even without erratic movement or sharp veering, can be sufficient to stop a vehicle. |
State v. Beciraj (see Docket Memo)
2003 ND 173
Highlight: The crime of conspiracy is limited to agreements to engage in a crime or crimes that are defined elsewhere. |
Litoff v. Pinter
2003 ND 172 Highlight: Although visitation between a child and the noncustodial parent is ordinarily presumed to be in the best interest of the child, visitation may be curtailed or eliminated entirely if it is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health. |
State v. Beciraj (see Docket Memo)
2003 ND 171
Highlight: Obvious errors affecting substantial rights may be addressed on appeal even if the error was not brought to the attention of the trial court. |
Disciplinary Board v. McKechnie (Cross-reference w/ 20020199)
2003 ND 170
Highlight: An attorney is appropriately suspended from the practice of law when this Court finds clear and convincing evidence of an ethical violation. |
Akerlind v. Buck, et al.
2003 ND 169
Highlight: The credibility of witnesses, including expert witnesses, and the weight to be given their testimony, are questions for the trier of fact. |