Opinions

State v. Wilson 2004 ND 51
Docket No.: 20030112
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence must show that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, supports no reasonable inference of guilt.
Failure to give defendant's requested instruction is not error when the requested instruction misstates the law and when the instruction might unnecessarily confuse the jury.

State v. Pettit 2004 ND 50
Docket No.: 20030244
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal conviction for accomplice to manufacturing methamphetamine is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Beaudoin v. South Texas Blood & Tissue Center 2004 ND 49
Docket No.: 20030148
Filing Date: 3/1/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Removing, preserving, and delivery of body parts involves science or art requiring special skills not ordinarily possessed by lay persons and is governed by the two-year statute of limitations for malpractice.
A process server's service of process upon a corporation's Executive Office Manager will be deemed valid if a corporate employee identifies the Executive Office Manager as a proper person to accept service, the process server reasonably relies on that identifying representation, the Executive Office Manager served is of sufficient character and rank to make it reasonably certain that the defendant will be apprised of the service made, and the service results in actual delivery to a person responsible for protecting the corporation's interests in litigation.

State v. Bergstrom 2004 ND 48
Docket No.: 20030160
Filing Date: 2/27/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A search warrant is valid if it is supported by probable cause and it particularly describes the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
A four-factor balancing is used to evaluate the validity of a speedy trial claim: length of the delay, reason for the delay, proper assertion of the right, and actual prejudice to the accused.

Vandall v. Trinity Hospitals, et al. 2004 ND 47
Docket No.: 20030255
Filing Date: 2/27/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: There is no common law tort for retaliatory discharge in North Dakota because of the statute.
A 180-day statute of limitations governs a claim for retaliatory discharge.
An individual who merely provides facts concerning the conduct of another to an administrative board possessing the authority to issue charges is not liable for wrongful use of civil proceedings before an administrative board.
In a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the conduct must be so extreme in degree as to be beyond all possible bounds of decency and utterly intolerable in a civilized society.
A trial court may award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party in an action for retaliatory discharge brought under the statute.

Muhammed v. Welch 2004 ND 46
Docket No.: 20030182
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Service on a decedent's widower is not service on the decedent's estate.
The fraudulent concealment necessary to extend a statute of limitations an additional year under section 28-01-24, N.D.C.C., relates to concealment of the cause of action, not concealment of the death of a party.
Equitable estoppel may preclude application of a statute of limitations as a defense by one whose actions mislead another, inducing that person to not file a claim within the statutory period.
An insurance adjuster acting for an insurance company may be considered the agent of the insured so as to estop the defendant-insured from raising the statute of limitations defense.
Representatives of a deceased defendant may have an affirmative duty to inform the plaintiff of the defendant's death.

Harfield, et al. v. Tate (Cross-ref. w/19980345) 2004 ND 45
Docket No.: 20030039
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The commission of an act cannot be proved by showing the commission of similar acts by the same person at other times, or by showing the act was in conformity with the person's character or a character trait.

State v. Lemons 2004 ND 44
Docket No.: 20030029
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A trial court's refusal to allow a defense witness to testify by telephone is not an abuse of discretion because the Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that all testimony is to be taken orally in open court.
Denial of a motion for continuance to procure an absent witness is not obvious error when a defendant fails to demonstrate the denial affected a substantial right.
Without a showing of prejudice, a trial court's denial of a motion for new trial is not an abuse of discretion.

State v. Ochoa (Consolidated w/20030133) 2004 ND 43
Docket No.: 20030132
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Without an unequivocal waiver of the constitutional right to counsel or an unequivocal assertion of the constitutional right to self-representation, a trial court is not required to permit self-representation or inquire into the issue of self-representation.
Hybrid representation is not a constitutional right. A defendant's request to proceed in such a manner is not an unequivocal assertion of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to self-representation.

Wutzke v. Hoberg, et al. 2004 ND 42
Docket No.: 20030300
Filing Date: 2/25/2004
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A party seeking a writ of mandamus bears the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the performance of the particular acts to be compelled by the writ and must demonstrate there is no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.