Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2901 - 2950 of 12382 results
Interest of L.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 260 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rusgrove v. Goter
2015 ND 259 Highlight: A district court's summary judgment dismissing a plaintiff's lawsuit with prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
In the Interest of A.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 258 Highlight: A district court order adopting a referee's order that transferred the case from juvenile court to adult court is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Sall v. Sall (cross-reference w/ 20100360 & 20120448)
2015 ND 257 Highlight: A district court judgment adjusting the monthly amount of child support payments is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of T.A.G.
2015 ND 256 Highlight: A district court order for continued commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Leno v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 255
Highlight: When the specimen submitter's checklist is not sent to the Department of Transportation or presented as evidence at the administrative hearing, testimony from the specimen submitter can be used to show scrupulous compliance with the methods approved by the state crime laboratory director. |
Capes v. Capes
2015 ND 254 Highlight: To modify parenting time, the moving party must demonstrate that a material change in circumstances has occurred since entry of the previous parenting time order and that the modification is in the best interests of the child. |
Estate of Amundson, et al.
2015 ND 253
Highlight: The district court is considered an expert in determining the value of reasonable attorney's fees for services rendered to an estate, and its decision will not be overturned on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. |
Poppe v. Stockert, et al.
2015 ND 252
Highlight: A landlord may dispose of a tenant's abandoned personal property under N.D.C.C. 47-16-30.1. The landlord must retain property valued at more than $1,500 for the time required by statute. |
Gronland v. Gronland (cross-reference w/19940193)
2015 ND 251
Highlight: Jurisdiction to modify spousal support does not extend beyond the support period, unless the court reserves that jurisdiction. |
Olson v. Levi
2015 ND 250 Highlight: The report and notice form forwarded to the department of transportation must include adequate probable cause information showing the arrestee was in actual physical control of or was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol to provide the department authority to suspend driving privileges. |
City of Jamestown v. Hanson
2015 ND 249 Highlight: Testimony regarding blood-alcohol testing procedures may be admitted into evidence without satisfying the statutory requirements for admission of blood-alcohol test results. |
Tidd v. Kroshus
2015 ND 248
Highlight: Jury instructions on issues not supported by the evidence are erroneous but arereversible error only when they are prejudicial or mislead the jury. |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of V.A.M.
2015 ND 247 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the appellate court is unable to understand the rationale underlying the district court's decision. |
Interest of W.M. (Confidential)
2015 ND 246 Highlight: District court order finding W.M. mentally ill and in need of treatment with medication summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of B.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 245 Highlight: Mental health commitment for up to 90 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Dubray v. State
2015 ND 244 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of Bartole (cross-ref w/ 20110243)
2015 ND 243 Highlight: A district court order for continued commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Meyer, et al. v. Engebretson, et al.
2015 ND 242 Highlight: Summary judgment deciding ownership of mineral interests is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Kitzan v. State
2015 ND 241 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Berg
2015 ND 240 Highlight: District court order for revocation of probation and amended criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Wedemeyer v. State
2015 ND 239 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 238
Highlight: A fiduciary duty, including a corresponding duty of loyalty and honesty, arises between an oil company and its landman based on a confidential relationship. |
State v. Montplaisir
2015 ND 237
Highlight: An information is sufficient if it sets forth the offense in the words of the statute and is specific enough to provide a defendant with notice of the pending charges to enable the defendant to prepare a defense. |
Klein v. Klein
2015 ND 236
Highlight: Under the child support guidelines, "self-employment" means employment that results in an obligor earning income from any business organization or entity which the obligor is, to a significant extent, able to directly or indirectly control. |
State v. Guttormson
2015 ND 235
Highlight: Statements admitted to prove a point other than the truth of the matter asserted are not testimonial hearsay statements. |
State v. Chase
2015 ND 234 Highlight: A trial court does not abuse its discretion by excluding evidence of prior sexual activity between a victim and defendant when the defendant has not provided the required notice of intent to offer such evidence. |
Interest of M.R., a Child (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 233
Highlight: The juvenile court is not required to second-guess an attorney's statement regarding his client's decision not to appear by telephone at a termination of parental rights trial. |
Norby v. Estate of Kuykendall, et al.
2015 ND 232 Highlight: When a boundary is fixed by a deed at a specified line without reference to the water, the grantee cannot claim accretions beyond that line. |
Greywind v. State
2015 ND 231
Highlight: A district court summarily dismissing a post-conviction relief application under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-09(1) must rely on information found solely within the application. |
State v. Morales
2015 ND 230
Highlight: A warrantless blood-alcohol test is unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. |
Grigg v. Grigg
2015 ND 229 Highlight: Unless the opposing party's counter-affidavits conclusively establish the movant's allegations have no credibility, the district court must accept the truth of the moving party's allegations. |
Keller v. State
2015 ND 228
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence cannot be used to attack the underlying conviction. |
State v. Korynta
2015 ND 227 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of E.V. (Confidential)
2015 ND 226 Highlight: District court judgment finding a child is deprived is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Holverson v. Lundberg
2015 ND 225 Highlight: There is not jurisdiction to hear appeal from a judgment where unadjudicated claim has not been decided by district court. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, Southwest Judicial District
2015 ND 224 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Dickinson. |
State v. New Holland
2015 ND 223 Highlight: A person seeking compensatory remedial contempt sanctions against the state or a state employee must comply with the statutory requirements for claims against the state. |
Disciplinary Board v. Matson (consolidated w/ 20150220-20150221)
2015 ND 222 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Judicial District
2015 ND 221 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bottineau. |
Kuntz v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 220
Highlight: A lawyer's violation of the rules of professional conduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence. |
State v. Weight
2015 ND 219
Highlight: Double Jeopardy prohibits successive prosecutions and punishments for the same criminal offense. |
Matter of Hehn (cross-reference 20110053; 20120070; 20120212; 20130055;20130143)
2015 ND 218
Highlight: When a party fails to raise an issue before the district court, even a constitutional issue, an appellate court generally will not address the issue on appeal. A party must do more than submit bare assertions to adequately raise constitutional issues. |
Gerber v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 217 Highlight: Under the rules of professional conduct, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is prohibited from representing or holding out to the public that he is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. |
Hale v. City of Minot
2015 ND 216
Highlight: A local governing body's decision is affirmed unless the local body acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably, or there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision. |
Freidig, et al. v. Weed, et al.
2015 ND 215
Highlight: A warranty deed that does not express the parties' intent may be reformed on the ground of mutual mistake. |
Gabaldon-Cochran v. Cochran
2015 ND 214
Highlight: Distribution of marital property does not need to be equal, but the distribution must be equitable and a substantial disparity must be explained. |
State v. Weinmann (consolidated w/ 20140440)
2015 ND 213 Highlight: The reliability of informants within the criminal milieu must be established. |
State v. Rufus
2015 ND 212
Highlight: The word "obtain," in the context of the human trafficking statute, encompasses acquiring temporary custody of a person for the purpose of engaging in commercial sex acts with that person. |
State v. Pogue
2015 ND 211
Highlight: A motion to reconsider does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal from an order suppressing evidence in a criminal matter. |