Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2901 - 2950 of 12446 results
Estate of Glasoe, et al. v. Williams County, ND, et al.
2016 ND 18
Highlight: There must be strict compliance with mandatory jurisdictional requirements of the tax lien foreclosure statutes, and those statutes will be strictly construed in favor of the owners of the property. |
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc., et al.
2016 ND 17
Highlight: Generally, the existence of a duty is a preliminary question of law for the court. When a duty does not exist, there is no negligence. |
Ritter v. Ritter
2016 ND 16 Highlight: A parent may establish a prima facie case for modification of residential responsibility following a stipulated divorce when the parent's affidavit evidences a significant change in employment resulting in a predictable work schedule and such modification is in the children's best interests. |
State v. Knox
2016 ND 15 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court fails to make adequate findings explaining the evidentiary and legal basis for its decision. |
Wanttaja v. Wanttaja
2016 ND 14
Highlight: A district court has jurisdiction in divorce proceedings to award appropriate child support for a parties' child, even when a temporary support order has been entered by a district court in another county while the parties are still married. |
State v. Atkins
2016 ND 13
Highlight: Issues not brought before the district court are generally inappropriate for appeal. |
Forster v. Flaagan
2016 ND 12
Highlight: A prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility is a bare minimum standard requiring facts that would support modification if proven at an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Hannah
2016 ND 11
Highlight: Pain is a phenomenon of common experience and understanding. |
State v. Horning
2016 ND 10
Highlight: The State may move for civil forfeiture of property within a criminal case. |
State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, et al. (cross-ref. w/20140444)
2016 ND 9
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion when it does not follow the procedural requirement of providing notice before amending an order or judgment to correct a clerical error. |
State v. Ballard
2016 ND 8 Highlight: Suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer's home is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. |
State v. Russell
2016 ND 7 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment revoking defendant's probation and sentencing him to prison is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
Sturre v. Levi
2016 ND 6 Highlight: Judgment affirming the Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 180 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Myers v. State
2016 ND 5 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
State v. Suelzle
2016 ND 4 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault, aggravated reckless driving, reckless endangerment, leaving the scene of an accident involving serious personal injury, leaving the scene of an accident involving an unattended vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident involving an attended vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Johnson v. State
2016 ND 3 Highlight: Denial of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, NEJD
2016 ND 2 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Devils Lake. |
Stock v. Stock
2016 ND 1
Highlight: It is not clearly erroneous for a court to award permanent spousal support instead of rehabilitative spousal support where the circumstances warrant both awards. |
Markgraf, et al. v. Welker, et al.
2015 ND 303
Highlight: Summary judgment is inappropriate if the court must draw inferences and make findings on disputed facts to support the judgment. |
Arrow Midstream Holdings, LLC, et al. v. 3 Bears Construction, LLC, et al.
2015 ND 302
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is final and appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
State v. Nelson (consolidated w/ 20150213)
2015 ND 301
Highlight: Restitution hearings are required when a defendant has pled guilty and the amount of restitution is in dispute or uncertain. |
Clark v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins., et al.
2015 ND 300
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law fully reviewable on appeal. |
Washburn v. Levi
2015 ND 299
Highlight: If an arrestee makes any affirmative mention of a need for an attorney before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing, law enforcement personnel must assume the arrestee is requesting an opportunity to consult with an attorney and must allow a reasonable opportunity to do so. |
Bayles v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 298
Highlight: A district court may not reverse a hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges when the only basis was failure to file the transcript within the statutory period. |
State v. Williams
2015 ND 297 Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a request for a transcript, and the court abuses its discretion by refusing the request if a particularized need, necessity, or justification for its preparation and use is shown. |
State v. Chatman
2015 ND 296
Highlight: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used to establish probable cause to issue a search warrant, but a court is not required to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search warrant if there was sufficient legal evidence presented to the issuing magistrate to establish probable cause. |
Interest of Thill (cross-reference w/ 20130291)
2015 ND 295 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings of fact supporting its determination that a defendant remains a sexually dangerous individual. Generally referencing medical reports without explaining which facts it considered in its determination is not sufficient. |
Butterfield v. Levi
2015 ND 294 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20150318)
2015 ND 293 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Musick v. Levi
2015 ND 292 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Jodoin v. Levi
2015 ND 291 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Johnson v. State
2015 ND 290 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Ward
2015 ND 289 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Disciplinary Board v. Varriano
2015 ND 288 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |
Fleck, et al. v. Missouri River Royalty Corp., et al.
2015 ND 287
Highlight: The term "production" as used in a "so long thereafter" clause and any related savings clause extending an oil and gas lease generally will be interpreted to mean "production in paying quantities." |
Disciplinary Board v. Huisman
2015 ND 286 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Blume Construction, Inc. v. State
2015 ND 285
Highlight: A corporation may not be represented by a non-attorney agent in a legal proceeding, and any legal documents signed and filed by a corporation's non-attorney agent are void. |
Knorr v. Norberg (cross ref. 20130084)
2015 ND 284
Highlight: A long-term lease with an option to purchase real property ordinarily requires a signed written agreement. |
State v. Hennings
2015 ND 283 Highlight: The law is violated when a defendant, under the influence of alcohol, is able to direct the movement of a vehicle in an area to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use. |
Disciplinary Board v. Johnston
2015 ND 282 Highlight: A law firm employing a paralegal who formerly was employed by another firm may continue representing clients whose interests conflict with the interests of clients of the former employer on whose matters the paralegal worked, as long as the employing firm screens the nonlawyer from information about or participating in matters involving those clients. |
State v. Walker
2015 ND 281 Highlight: A receipt of a general consent to search a vehicle reasonably extends to any container in that vehicle which may contain the object of that search. |
State v. Asbach
2015 ND 280
Highlight: A defendant is not illegally seized while an officer is conducting duties related to the purpose of a traffic stop. |
Chisholm v. State
2015 ND 279 Highlight: To prevail on a post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance, the petitioner must prove that (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance. |
State v. Acker
2015 ND 278
Highlight: Before admitting a defendant's prior conviction, the district court must weigh the conviction's probative value against its prejudicial effect in accordance with N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(1)(B). |
Sargent County Water Resource District v. Mathews, et al.
2015 ND 277
Highlight: The primary purpose in interpreting a deed is to ascertain and effectuate the grantor's intent. When a deed is unambiguous, the parties' intent is determined from the instrument itself. |
Bye v. Robinette
2015 ND 276
Highlight: Findings of fact must demonstrate that the district court followed the child support guidelines when imputing income. |
Yahna v. Altru Health System
2015 ND 275
Highlight: The presumption of at-will employment may be modified by an employment handbook creating contractual rights to employment, or by the statutory proscription against unlawful age discrimination. |
Rooks v. Robb
2015 ND 274
Highlight: Affidavits must be made on personal knowledge and contain more than conclusory statements to raise a genuine issue of material fact. |
Williamson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 273
Highlight: Foundation for the admission of blood test results may be laid by a designee of the director of the state crime lab who has been authorized to sign and certify records. |
Huether, et al. v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. (cross-reference w/20150029)
2015 ND 272
Highlight: Insurance coverage for "direct physical loss or damage" is not ambiguous as a matter of law. A district court does not err in finding the ordinary meaning of the phrase does not include loss-of-use coverage. |