Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5981 - 5990 of 12428 results
|
Jundt v. Jurassic Resources, et al.
2003 ND 9
Highlight: A trial court abuses its discretion only when it acts in an unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable manner, when its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned decision, or when it misinterprets or misapplies the law. |
|
Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group
2003 ND 8 Highlight: Except when the evidence is such that a reasoning mind could draw only one conclusion, whether an insured substantially complied with an insurance policy provision is a question of fact precluding summary judgment. |
|
State, et al. v. Gratech Co., et al.
2003 ND 7 Highlight: Absent a specific statutory or contractual exclusion, arbitrators have jurisdiction to determine whether a party has complied with procedural conditions precedent to arbitration. |
|
State v. Hammeren
2003 ND 6
Highlight: The defendant has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of evidence, the affirmative defense of entrapment. |
|
Engh v. Engh
2003 ND 5 Highlight: A party moving for a change in child custody within two years after entry of an order establishing custody may get an evidentiary hearing only if the trial court first determines the moving party has established a prima facie case justifying a modification by showing willful interference with visitation, danger to the child's health, or a change in primary physical care of the child to the other parent for longer than six months. |
|
Kondrad v. Bismarck Park District
2003 ND 4 Highlight: While the law does not favor contracts exonerating parties from liability for their conduct, parties are bound by clear and unambiguous language evidencing an intent to extinguish liability. |
|
Higgins v. Trauger (Consolidated w/20020133)
2003 ND 3
Highlight: Collusion does not require fraudulent conduct. |
|
Downing v. ND Workers Comp., et al.
2003 ND 2 Highlight: Judgment of the district court affirming a final order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Duemeland v. Norback
2003 ND 1 Highlight: A document is ambiguous when reasonable arguments can be made for different interpretations of the meaning of the document. |
|
Estate of Gleeson
2002 ND 211 Highlight: A person protected by a conservatorship retains the capacity to contract or engage in other transactions under our conservatorship statutes. |