Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6021 - 6030 of 12279 results
|
Opp v. Ward Co. Social Services Bd., et al.
2002 ND 45 Highlight: Assets are actually available for Medicaid eligibility purposes when the applicant has a legal interest in a liquidated sum and has the ability through reasonable legal means to attempt to make the sum available for support. |
|
Henderson v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Trans.
2002 ND 44
Highlight: The Supreme Court exercises a limited review in appeals involving drivers' license suspensions or revocations. |
|
State v. Schmidt
2002 ND 43 Highlight: Absent an offer of proof to support the claim, a trial court does not err in denying a motion in limine for a jury instruction on an affirmative defense of innocent mistake of fact. |
|
Wahl v. Country Mutual Ins. Co., et al.
2002 ND 42
Highlight: The statutory requirement that an insurer give at least ten days notice of cancellation of a commercial insurance policy during the term of the policy does not require an insurer to provide notice of cancellation when the policy term expires. |
|
State v. Morrison
2002 ND 41 Highlight: Judgment of conviction for assaulting a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
State v. Aipperspach
2002 ND 40 Highlight: Denial of motion to suppress and judgment of conviction for abuse of child in violation of N.D.C.C. 14-09-22 summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Dennison v. N.D. Dept. of Human Serv.
2002 ND 39
Highlight: The State's recorded homestead statement for old age assistance benefits under N.D.R.C. 50-0707 (1943) affects the right or interest of the State in land in North Dakota under the exception to the Marketable Record Title Act in N.D.C.C. 47-19.1-11(2). |
|
Gruebele, et al. v. Geringer
2002 ND 38 Highlight: A claimant's action to quiet title based on adverse possession will fail when the claimant is unable to prove hostile, exclusive, and continuous possession for the statutorily required time. |
|
Kelly v. Kelly
2002 ND 37
Highlight: An order changing custody is a finding of fact, which will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
|
State v. Hirschkorn
2002 ND 36
Highlight: Because of the importance of an accused's confrontation rights, the safeguards built into N.D.R.Ev. 803(24), allowing admission in evidence of a child's hearsay statements about sexual abuse, must be strictly observed. |