Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
501 - 600 of 12358 results
Fleck v. Fleck, et al.
2023 ND 129 |
Mickelson, et al. v. City of Rolla
2023 ND 128 Highlight: If an entity violates section 44-04-18, N.D.C.C., an interested person or entity may not file a civil action seeking attorney’s fees or damages, or both, until at least three working days after providing notice of the alleged violation to the chief administrative officer for the public entity under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.2(3). |
State v. Graff
2023 ND 127
Highlight: Dismissal of a criminal case with prejudice is a remedy that should only be used in extreme circumstances. |
State v. Graff
2023 ND 127 |
Interest of Gehlhoff
2023 ND 126 Highlight: When a district court concludes that an individual has a serious difficulty controlling behavior, its findings must identify recent conduct or describe anything that shows the individual has a “present serious difficulty controlling his behavior.” |
State v. Sullivan
2023 ND 125
Highlight: When making an arrest without a warrant, the officer shall inform the person to be arrested of the officer’s authority and the cause of the arrest, unless an exception under N.D.C.C. § 29-06-17 applies. |
Estate of Ewing
2023 ND 124
Highlight: The district court does not err in finding an oral contract existed when no evidence existed that any party lacked the capacity to contract. |
Estate of Ewing
2023 ND 124 |
Hegenes Apartment Management v. Borlay, et al.
2023 ND 123 Highlight: In a summary eviction proceeding, the right to the possession of the real estate is the only fact that can be litigated unless damages or rent is claimed. |
Hegenes Apartment Management v. Borlay, et al.
2023 ND 123 |
Interest of C.A.S.
2023 ND 122
Highlight: An appeal from a decision terminating parental rights must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment. The North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure do not authorize an extension. An appeal not filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. |
State v. Brame
2023 ND 121
Highlight: District courts must substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters a guilty plea. |
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
2023 ND 120 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings regarding whether a material change in circumstances resulted in a general decline or adversely affected the children in order to modify primary residential responsibility. |
State v. Noble (consolidated w/20220364)
2023 ND 119 Highlight: When the sufficiency of evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged, the record is reviewed on appeal to determine if there is competent evidence allowing the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting a conviction. |
State v. Noble (consolidated w/20220364)
2023 ND 119 |
Interest of I.C.
2023 ND 118 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Laducer v. Laducer, et al.
2023 ND 117 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to review and amend child support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (8). |
State v. Gardner
2023 ND 116
Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted defendant of child abuse in violation of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-22 is affirmed. |
State v. Coons
2023 ND 115
Highlight: A closure may occur where some or all members of the public are precluded from perceiving contemporaneously what is transpiring in the courtroom, because they can neither see nor hear what is going on. When questioning occurs at the bench, the public can still observe the proceedings, thus furthering the values that the public trial right is designed to protect, and can hear the general questions posed to the jury panel. |
State v. Coons
2023 ND 115 |
Asiama v. Asumeng, et al.
2023 ND 114
Highlight: The district court must value marital property as of the valuation date. |
Asiama v. Asumeng, et al.
2023 ND 114 |
Orwig v. Orwig (consolidated w/ 20220248)
2023 ND 113
Highlight: While the district court may direct a party prepare and submit to the court a proposed summary real estate disposition judgment, nothing in the relevant statute prohibits a party from submitting a proposed summary real estate disposition judgment for the court’s consideration absent direction from the court to do so. |
Orwig v. Orwig (consolidated w/ 20220248)
2023 ND 113 |
State v. Lonechild
2023 ND 112
Highlight: A defendant may be charged with escape under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-08-06 if they are in custody at a facility for custody of persons under charge or conviction of an offense, leave while participating in a work release program, and fail to return to the facility. |
Glasser v. State
2023 ND 111
Highlight: Class A misdemeanors involving different crimes committed against different victims on different dates can be consecutively sentenced under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-11(3). |
Interest of I.X.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 110 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
O'Neal v. State
2023 ND 109
Highlight: A district court’s order denying a post-conviction relief application based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed. |
O'Neal v. State
2023 ND 109 |
Etemad v. State
2023 ND 108
Highlight: The district court may summarily dismiss a petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief without giving notice when the application on its face is meritless and fails to allege any supporting facts. |
Etemad v. State
2023 ND 108 |
Interest of T.H.P.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 107 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Sanchez
2023 ND 106
Highlight: The district court abuses its discretion when it allows testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements. |
Brown v. State
2023 ND 105
Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Johnson
2023 ND 104 Highlight: Convictions of domestic violence and false information or report to law enforcement are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Johnson
2023 ND 104 |
Rocket Dogs K-9 Aquatics & Wellness Center v. Derheim, et al.
2023 ND 103
Highlight: An attorney may not compromise a client’s claims in the absence of express authority, and an attorney may not waive a client’s substantial rights without the client’s consent. Whether an attorney has been given express authority to settle a claim normally presents a question of fact. |
Rocket Dogs K-9 Aquatics & Wellness Center v. Derheim, et al.
2023 ND 103 |
State v. Heinrich
2023 ND 102 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted defendant of one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child and two counts of promoting obscenity to minors is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Heinrich
2023 ND 102 |
Blue Steel Oil and Gas v. NDIC, et al.
2023 ND 101
Highlight: An operator of oil and gas wells may impose a statutory penalty on a mineral owner who does not lease or participate in the risks and cost of drilling. |
Blue Steel Oil and Gas v. NDIC, et al.
2023 ND 101 |
Interest of P.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 100
Highlight: Civil commitments of sexually dangerous individuals are reviewed under a modified clearly erroneous standard. A district court’s decision will be affirmed unless it is induced by an erroneous view of the law or the decision is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. |
Interest of P.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 100 |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 99 Highlight: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is affirmed. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 99 |
Gwilliams v. Gwilliams
2023 ND 98
Highlight: Whether to stay enforcement of a judgment pending appeal is a collateral matter within the district court’s jurisdiction. |
Gwilliams v. Gwilliams
2023 ND 98 |
State v. Brown
2023 ND 97
Highlight: The court may modify or enlarge conditions of probation at any time before the expiration or termination of the period for which the probation remains conditional, upon notice to the probationer and with good cause. If the probationer violates a condition of probation, the court may continue the existing probation with or without modifying or enlarging the conditions or revoke probation and impose sentence. |
State v. Brown
2023 ND 97 |
Chambering of Two New Judgeships in the East Central Judicial District
2023 ND 95 |
Falcon v. Knudsen, et al.
2023 ND 94
Highlight: A district court order finding appellant did not establish a prima facie case for modification of primary residential responsibility and denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility is affirmed. |
Falcon v. Knudsen, et al.
2023 ND 94 |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2023 ND 93
Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Matter of Shane Lance Yates
2023 ND 93 |
Matter of Amy Jo Yates
2023 ND 93
Highlight: District court orders denying petitions for name changes are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Gartei v. Gartei
2023 ND 92 Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to vacate the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Kutcka, et al. v. Gateway Building Systems, et al.
2023 ND 91
Highlight: A general contractor is not the statutory employer of its subcontractor’s employees entitling it to immunity from suit under the exclusive remedy provisions of N.D.C.C. § 65-04-28. |
Kutcka, et al. v. Gateway Building Systems, et al.
2023 ND 91 |
Nelson v. NDDOT
2023 ND 90 Highlight: Without a valid request for an on-site screening test, including a valid advisory, there can be no refusal to submit to screening under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-14. |
Nelson v. NDDOT
2023 ND 90 |
State v. Walsh
2023 ND 89 Highlight: A district court must inform the defendant of the court’s authority to order restitution before a guilty plea can be accepted. |
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
2023 ND 88
Highlight: The district court’s findings are inadequate to understand the basis for the decision. |
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
2023 ND 88 |
Johnson v. City of Jamestown
2023 ND 87 Highlight: A judgment dismissing a personal injury action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Johnson v. City of Jamestown
2023 ND 87 |
Anderson v. Anderson
2023 ND 86
Highlight: All property held by either party, whether held jointly or individually, is considered marital property. |
Anderson v. Anderson
2023 ND 86 |
E.R.J. v. T.L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 85
Highlight: A district court’s findings that changing a child’s name is in the best interests of a child satisfies the good cause standard under N.D.C.C. § 14-20-57(7). |
E.R.J. v. T.L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 85 |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84
Highlight: Interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law, fully reviewable on appeal. |
Nodak Ins. Co. v. Farm Family Casualty Ins. Co., et al.
2023 ND 84 |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, NWJD
2023 ND 83 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Williston. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82
Highlight: When a party asserts prosecutorial misconduct for the first time on appeal, this Court may review for obvious error. |
State v. Smith
2023 ND 82 |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81
Highlight: The district court decides the qualifications of the witness to express an opinion on a given topic. The decision whether to admit expert witness testimony rests within the court’s discretion. |
State v. Schaf
2023 ND 81 |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80
Highlight: Ordering a mistrial is an extreme remedy that is only appropriate when there is a fundamental defect or occurrence at trial that makes it evident that continuing would be productive of manifest injustice. |
State v. Hannesson
2023 ND 80 |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 Highlight: An order of contempt and an amended order of contempt and award of attorney’s fees are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Hanson v. Hettervig, et al.
2023 ND 79 |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78
Highlight: A district court’s finding on a valuation of real property is not clearly erroneous if it is within the range of evidence presented. |
Fietzek v. Fietzek
2023 ND 78 |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77
Highlight: In the instance of an alleged public trial violation, an appellant must demonstrate the public was excluded from a proceeding taking place during trial, and that the proceeding was substantive in nature. |
State v. Frederick
2023 ND 77 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76 |
Sandberg v. WSI, et al.
2023 ND 76
Highlight: WSI can exercise continuing jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04, but is limited by the law-of-the-case doctrine. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75
Highlight: A personal representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for the personal representative’s services. |
Estate of Lindbo
2023 ND 75 |
Krueger v. Krueger
2023 ND 74 Highlight: A district court’s order on spousal support and contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of K.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 73 Highlight: An order requiring hospitalization is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 72 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4). |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 Highlight: This Court exercises limited review in appeals from administrative agency decisions. However, the application and interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which is fully reviewable in an administrative appeal. |
Jahner v. NDDHS
2023 ND 71 |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
State v. Jacobs
2023 ND 70 |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order must be supported by specific findings of intent to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person. |
Jones v. Rath
2023 ND 69 |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68
Highlight: A criminal sentence finalized before enactment of a statute cannot be reduced. |
State v. Neugebauer
2023 ND 68 |