Opinions

State v. Alinder 2024 ND 104
Docket No.: 20230350
Filing Date: 5/30/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated reckless driving is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Camperud 2024 ND 103
Docket No.: 20230370
Filing Date: 5/30/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The district court should impose the least severe sanction when determining the remedy for the State discovery violation. The level of appropriate sanction depends on the severity of the disclosure violation.

Estate of Almer 2024 ND 102
Docket No.: 20230365
Filing Date: 5/30/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When interpreting a will the primary objective is to determine the testator's intent. Extrinsic evidence may be considered to resolve an ambiguity. A will is ambiguous if its language is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.

A personal representative is a fiduciary who shall observe the standards of care applicable to trustees. A personal representative may be liable to interested persons for damage or loss resulting from breach of the personal representative's fiduciary duty to the same extent as a trustee of an express trust. Whether a personal representative breached a fiduciary duty is a question of fact.

A personal representative is entitled to receive reasonable attorney fees from an estate when he or she defends or prosecutes any proceeding in good faith, whether successful or not.

In the Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Julie L. Bruggeman, a Member of the Bar of State of North Dakota 2024 ND 101
Docket No.: 20240111
Filing Date: 5/23/2024
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Reciprocal
Author: Per Curiam

State v. Anderson 2024 ND 100
Docket No.: 20230374
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Aune v. State 2024 ND 99
Docket No.: 20230273
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court may dismiss an application without notice to the applicant if it does not rely on information outside the application and considers only materials contained in the application or embraced by the pleadings.

Postconviction relief proceedings are appropriately treated as a continuation of the criminal prosecution for purposes of N.D.C.C. § 29-15-21, and the applicant is not entitled to a new judge when the postconviction judge was also the trial judge.

A demand for a change of judge is not the proper route to remove a judge for bias. Rather, the judge assigned to the case should consider the claim of bias, not another judge.

Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20230391) 2024 ND 98
Docket No.: 20230392
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's order on petitions is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2).

Armitage v. Armitage 2024 ND 97
Docket No.: 20230368
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A district court's decision on primary residential responsibility is a
finding of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
Under the clearly erroneous standard, this Court on appeal does not
reweigh the evidence nor reassess the credibility of witnesses, and this
Court will not retry a custody case or substitute its judgment for a district
court's initial primary residential responsibility decision merely because
this Court might have reached a different result.
The district court considers the best interests and welfare of the child
when deciding residential responsibility. That includes considering whether
one parent will better promote the welfare and best interests of the child
than the other; however, the analysis is not parent verses parent, or one
proposed parenting plan against the other proposed parenting plan.

State v. Rangel 2024 ND 96
Docket No.: 20230356
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A criminal defendant may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing
only by demonstrating a manifest injustice.
The defendant has the burden of proving withdrawal is necessary to
correct a manifest injustice.
The district court has discretion in finding whether a manifest
injustice necessitating the withdrawal of a guilty plea exists, and the court's
decision is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Brown v. State 2024 ND 95
Docket No.: 20230364
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: The definition of official detention does not preclude custody while on probation.

An unambiguous sentence pronouncement controls over an ambiguous sentence, whether oral or written.

When there is an ambiguity between two sentences, the record must be examined to determine the district court's intent.

Jung v. State 2024 ND 94
Docket No.: 20240031
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: To succeed on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, the applicant must show: (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.
When a defendant pleads guilty on the advice of counsel, the defendant may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea.

State v. Castleman 2024 ND 93
Docket No.: 20230371
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 14 a defendant must show more than naked assertions that prejudice may occur based on the number of offenses being charged and instead must show he suffered substantial prejudice as a result of the joinder.

Interest of S.M.F. 2024 ND 92
Docket No.: 20240097
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Solberg v. Hennessy 2024 ND 91
Docket No.: 20230289
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Adverse or erroneous rulings do not, by themselves, demonstrate bias. Rather, for recusal to be warranted, a judge must be partial or there must be some external influence that creates an appearance of impropriety.

Orders denying motions for relief from judgment and for reconsideration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). Double costs and attorney's fees are awarded for defending this frivolous appeal.

Rivera-Rieffel v. State 2024 ND 90
Docket No.: 20230402
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Eggl 2024 ND 89
Docket No.: 20230376
Filing Date: 5/16/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment sentencing a defendant to 80 years imprisonment with 20 years suspended and 10 years supervised probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

SPOTTIE v. BAIUL-FARINA, et al. 2024 ND 88
Docket No.: 20230195
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Wholesale adoption of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is disapproved.

District courts retain authority to revisit interlocutory orders until entry of final judgment.

Under the doctrine of merger, the provisions of an executory contract merge into an instrument conveying real property. Absent fraud or mistake, the conveying instrument alone governs determination of the rights of the parties to the transaction.

Recordation of a granting instrument is not necessary to effect a conveyance. Nor is it necessary for a plaintiff to present the original conveying instrument to prevail in quiet title action. In a quiet title action ownership may be established through evidence that a conveying instrument was delivered but subsequently lost.
The equitable defense of laches may be available when a party delays enforcing his rights and a change in conditions during the delay results in prejudice to an adverse party.

To have standing to litigate an issue a party must have suffered some injury from the putatively illegal action and the party must assert his own legal rights and interests and cannot rest his claim on the legal rights and interests of third parties.

Parties may contract to a fee recovery standard that is either looser or stricter than statutory standards.

State v. Williams 2024 ND 87
Docket No.: 20230300
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment for attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Glaum v. State 2024 ND 86
Docket No.: 20230236
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Rule 58 of the North Dakota Supreme Court Administrative Rules addresses vexatious litigation. Litigation means any civil or disciplinary action or proceeding, including any appeal from an administrative agency, any review of a referee order by the district court, and any appeal to the supreme court. Rule 58 does not apply to criminal actions or documents filed in criminal actions.

An appeal from a vexatious litigant pre-filing order must be filed with the clerk of the supreme court within 60 days of service of notice of entry of the order. When there is no service of notice of entry of the order or evidence of actual knowledge of entry, the time for filing a notice of appeal does not begin to run.

A presiding judge may determine a person is a vexatious litigant based on the finding that in the immediately preceding seven-year period the person has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained as a self-represented party at least three litigations that have been finally determined adversely to that person.

If a response to the proposed pre-filing order is filed, the presiding judge may, in the judge's discretion, grant a hearing on the proposed order.

An appellant is precluded from challenging an order that was not appealed from in the notice of appeal and raising an issue for the first time on appeal.

Harris v. Oasis Petroleum, et al. 2024 ND 85
Docket No.: 20230279
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A motion to alter or amend the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(j) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.
The question of who is a prevailing party under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-06 is a question of law, subject to de novo review.
A prevailing party in a tort action must at least prevail on the issues of negligence and proximate cause. There may not be a single prevailing party when opposing parties each prevail on some issues.
Under North Dakota's comparative fault statute, N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02, in the case of a contributorily negligent plaintiff, any damages allowed shall be diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the person recovering. However, N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02 does not provide for any diminution in the costs and disbursements to be allowed to a recovering plaintiff.
A district court has the discretion to award a prevailing party costs and disbursements under N.D.C.C. § 28-26-06, without reduction by the party's percentage of fault. The law does not require a court to reduce costs awarded to the prevailing party based on its percentage of fault.

Field v. Field, et al. 2024 ND 84
Docket No.: 20230405
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Under Rule 30(a), N.D.R.App.P., a party's references to evidence in any document on appeal must cite to items in the record. This Court does not consider documents that are not in the certified record. After an initial custody decision has been made, parenting time modifications are governed by N.D.C.C. § 14-05-22(2) and by standards set forth in caselaw. A parenting plan must include a provision on decision making responsibility under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-30(2)(a), and that responsibility must be allocated in the best interests of the child, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-31(2). A district court's decision on parenting time and decision making responsibility is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.

Interest of Skorick 2024 ND 83
Docket No.: 20230330
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court must have sufficient factual findings to show a sexually dangerous individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Past conduct is relevant and may be considered with present conduct to determine if an individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Failure to attend treatment might demonstrate inability to control behavior just as violation of other institutional rules. The district court's findings are sufficient to show the individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior.

State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230383-20230385) 2024 ND 82
Docket No.: 20230382
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382, 20230384, & 20230385) 2024 ND 82
Docket No.: 20230383
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382, 20230383, & 20230385) 2024 ND 82
Docket No.: 20230384
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382-20230384) 2024 ND 82
Docket No.: 20230385
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Morales v. Weatherford U.S., et al. 2024 ND 81
Docket No.: 20230110
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: Only those judgments and decrees which constitute a final determination of the parties' rights to an action and those orders enumerated in N.D.C.C. § 28-27-02 are appealable.

Rule 60(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., applies to final judgments or orders. A final judgment is a decree, order, or judgment "from which an appeal lies." N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(a).

Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., recognizes a district court may direct entry of a final judgment against only some of the parties to a litigation, but until final judgment is entered all orders are subject to revision.

Zander, et al. v. Morsette 2024 ND 80
Docket No.: 20230103
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: The district court controls the scope and substance of opening and closing arguments, and a district court's decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.

A party is not prejudiced by a counsel's improper arguments when the district court instructs the jury not to consider counsel's comments as evidence.

A court may grant a new trial on grounds the jury awarded excessive damages appearing to have been awarded under the influence of passion or prejudice. To justify the granting of a new trial, passion and prejudice usually connote anger, resentment, hate, and disregard of the rights of others.

When a jury awards excessive damages, under appropriate circumstances, the district court and this Court on appeal, may order a reduction of the verdict instead of a new trial or order that a new trial be had unless the prevailing party remits the excess damages.

State v. Pederson 2024 ND 79
Docket No.: 20230318
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: To succeed in a challenge under Brady, the defendant must demonstrate the evidence was favorable to the defendant or plainly exculpatory.

To preserve a sufficiency of the evidence challenge for appeal, the defendant must move for acquittal under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 unless the district court committed obvious error.

State v. Hartson 2024 ND 78
Docket No.: 20230243
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Changing the culpability level of the crime charged is not a modification of a statute. Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-02-02(4), a lesser degree of culpability is satisfied if the proven degree of culpability is higher.

The district court's failure to submit statutory definition of that term was not obvious error affecting defendant's substantial rights.

It is not clearly established law in North Dakota that, where the State alleges multiple predicate felonies in a felony murder prosecution under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-16-01(1)(c), the district court must include an instruction that the jury must unanimously agree on the predicate felony to convict the defendant of murder.
Not including separate verdict forms for each predicate felony was not obvious error.

There was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of murder.

Musland v. Musland 2024 ND 77
Docket No.: 20230345
Filing Date: 5/2/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A marital distribution does not need to be equal to be equitable, and while assessing a property division, a district court may consider the importance of preserving the viability of a business operation like a family farm. Liquidation of an ongoing farming operation or business is ordinarily a last resort.

A district court property division granting one party a net estate of $3,224,357 while assigning them virtually no debt, and the other a net estate of $4,961,915 included all of the debt, almost no liquidity, and no retirement funds, was not clearly erroneous.

A district court does not need to consider potential tax implications of a property division when the record failed to support a conclusion that the sale of the property was imminent, failed to indicate the tax liability, or quantified a specific liability to the court.

A party is not entitled to an accrual of rent for the use of marital property during the pendency of divorce proceedings absent agreement or seeking district court intervention during the interim.
Language in a right to first refusal that does not clarify if the right is triggered by a response to "any" offer made to purchase property or if it is triggered by a party's "acceptance" of an offer is ambiguous.

Estate of Kish 2024 ND 76
Docket No.: 20230275
Filing Date: 4/26/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A two-step analysis is required to determine whether an order is appealable. First, for this Court to have appellate jurisdiction, the order being appealed must meet statutory criteria for appealability. Second, for this Court to consider the appeal at this time, the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) must have been satisfied.
Decisions have stated that this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction when an appellant fails to obtain N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification when required, but dismissal under Rule 54(b) is not for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
The parties did not request Rule 54(b) certification. The case is remanded under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3)(B) so that the district court may determine in the first instance whether a Rule 54(b) certification is appropriate.

State v. Fuglesten 2024 ND 74
Docket No.: 20230299
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a conditional plea is reversed and remanded to allow for withdrawal of the guilty plea because law enforcement illegally entered the home without exigent circumstances. If a misdemeanant is fleeing law enforcement, then exigent circumstances are required to permit law enforcement to enter the misdemeanant's home.

Berdahl v. Berdahl 2024 ND 73
Docket No.: 20230278
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When this Court has made a legal pronouncement and remanded a case for further proceedings, the parties may not relitigate the issue and the district court is required to follow the terms of our decision. The district court has some discretion on the procedures used on remand. However, that discretion is not without bounds and must be exercised within the scope of our decision. Adverse or erroneous rulings do not, by themselves, demonstrate bias of a district court judge.

Schmidt v. Hess Corp., et al. 2024 ND 72
Docket No.: 20230272
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: To prove negligence, a plaintiff must establish the existence of a duty, breach of that duty, and an injury proximately caused by the breach of duty.
The employer of an independent contractor who retains control of part of the work owes a duty of care to the independent contractor' s employees to exercise the retained control with reasonable
care.
A property owner who hires an independent contractor may be held liable to the independent contractor and its employees for injuries resulting from hazards at the workplace when the property
owner retains control over the work.

Cichos, et al. v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C., et al. 2024 ND 71
Docket No.: 20230212
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., preserves our long-standing policy against piecemeal appeals. When this Court considers the merits in a case involving a N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, it does so because the resolution of the issue on appeal will always need to be resolved and is separate from the issue left to be adjudicated.
To establish a prima facie case of professional negligence, a plaintiff must produce expert evidence establishing the applicable standard of care, violation of that standard, and a causal relationship between the violation and the harm complained of. To warrant a finding that a person's conduct is the proximate cause of an injury, the injury must be the natural and probable result of the conduct and must have been foreseen or reasonably anticipated by that person as a probable result of the conduct. Mere speculation is not enough.

Rennie v. State 2024 ND 69
Docket No.: 20230303
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al. 2024 ND 68
Docket No.: 20230306
Filing Date: 4/19/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: We will not consider an appeal in a multi-claim lawsuit where the district court order disposes of fewer than all the claims against all the parties unless the court has determined that a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) is appropriate.

Urrabazo v. State 2024 ND 67
Docket No.: 20230316
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is affirmed.

This Court does not reweigh credibility or resolve conflicts in the evidence.

State v. Freeman 2024 ND 66
Docket No.: 20230207
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A motion for mistrial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion or a manifest injustice would result. Granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be resorted to when a fundamental defect or occurrence in the trial proceedings exists that makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice.

Trial courts have wide discretion over the conduct of trial and the courtroom.

A trial court does not abuse its discretion by granting a recess when jurors are ill or have other such emergencies.

A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Kemmet v. Kemmet 2024 ND 65
Docket No.: 20230194
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A divorce judgment is reversed in part and remanded for clarification of the district court’s findings regarding equitable distribution of the marital estate and a correct accounting of the distribution.

All property held by either party, whether held jointly or individually, is considered marital property, and the district court must determine the total value of the marital property before making an equitable distribution.

Separate property, even if it is inherited, must initially be included in the marital estate, but the property’s origin may be considered when equitably dividing the estate.

State v. Alameen 2024 ND 64
Docket No.: 20230320
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: When asserting a claim of obvious error, a defendant must show: (1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error affects the defendant’s substantial rights, if there is no error there is no reason to go further into the analysis.

When the sufficiency of evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged, the conviction rests on insufficient evidence only if no rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt when weighed in a light most favorable to the verdict.

State v. Alameen 2024 ND 64
Docket No.: 20230320
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Adoption of T.J.R. and B.L.R. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2024 ND 63
Docket No.: 20240056
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. § 14-15-19 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

A district court finding of abandonment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

A court may waive the investigation and report required under N.D.C.C. § 14-15-11 for a petition of adoption if the petitioner is a court-appointed legal guardian or a relative other than a stepparent of the minor, the minor has lived with the petitioner for at least nine months, no allegations of abuse or neglect have been filed against the petitioner or any member of the petitioner’s household, and the court is satisfied that the proposed adoptive home is appropriate for the minor.

For convenience or to avoid prejudice, the court may order a separate trial of one or more separate issues, claims, crossclaims, counterclaims, or third-party claims under N.D.R.Civ.P. 42(b).

Cote v. Cote 2024 ND 62
Docket No.: 20230274
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: If the district court determines a material change in circumstances has occurred, the court must consider whether changing primary residential responsibility is necessary to serve the child’s best interests. When a trial court does not make required findings, it errs as a matter of law, and it is necessary to remand for additional findings.

Interest of S.S.C. 2024 ND 61
Docket No.: 20240053
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Henke 2024 ND 60
Docket No.: 20230302
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: An invited error of a non-structural issue will not be reviewed by this Court under the Invited Error Doctrine.

A sentence is illegal when the sentence is not within statutory limits or the sentence is unable to be served within statutory limits.

A reviewing court must clearly understand the sentencing court’s intent for the sentence and there must be no ambiguity for when probation begins.

Urrabazo v. State 2024 ND 59
Docket No.: 20230317
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court’s order for denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Hoever v. Wilder 2024 ND 58
Docket No.: 20230295
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: An appellant’s argument must contain the appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies, and citation to the record showing that the issue was preserved for review or a statement of grounds for seeking review of an issue not preserved. A party waives an issue by not providing supporting argument and, without supportive reasoning or citations to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit. The Court will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed, or engage in unassisted searches of the record for evidence to support a litigant’s position.

Interest of J.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2024 ND 57
Docket No.: 20240059
Filing Date: 4/4/2024
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).