On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
601 - 610 of 12500 results
Interest of A.Z.
2023 ND 163
Docket No.: 20230245
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Interest of A.Z.
2023 ND 163
Docket No.: 20230245
Filing Date: 9/14/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 162
Docket No.: 20230152
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer suspended.
Disciplinary Board v. Pilch
2023 ND 161
Docket No.: 20230147
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer disbarred.
Disciplinary Board v. Overboe
2023 ND 160
Docket No.: 20230090
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer suspended.
Disciplinary Board v. Baird
2023 ND 159
Docket No.: 20230075
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer suspended.
Interest of A.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20230210)
2023 ND 158
Docket No.: 20230209
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).
Interest of A.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20230198 & 20230199)
2023 ND 157
Docket No.: 20230197
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
Sayler v. Sayler
2023 ND 156
Docket No.: 20230004
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan
Highlight: A motion to relocate is not necessary when residential responsibility has not previously been established. Therefore, consideration of the Stout-Hawkinson factors is not necessary when the district court originally determines parental responsibility of parents living in different states.
The purpose or motive for a unilateral move is one of the many factors courts should consider and weigh when determining parental responsibility.
State v. Petersen
2023 ND 155
Docket No.: 20230049
Filing Date: 8/17/2023
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.
Highlight: Law enforcement exceeds its community caretaking function when it opens the door of a sleeping occupant’s parked semi-truck and steps onto the running boards in an attempt to gather information without first attempting to get a response from outside of the vehicle.
Under prong two of the inevitable discovery doctrine, the State must prove that the evidence would have been found without the unlawful activity and must show how the discovery of the evidence would have occurred.