Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3101 - 3150 of 12359 results
State v. Bear
2015 ND 36
Highlight: To successfully challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant must show the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, permits no reasonable inference of guilt. |
Peltier v. State
2015 ND 35
Highlight: When a court has accepted a guilty plea and imposed a sentence, the defendant cannot withdraw the plea unless withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. |
Steinbach v. State
2015 ND 34
Highlight: Evidence of other acts or crimes the defendant committed are excluded under N.D.R.Ev. 404(b) only when the acts or crimes are independent of the charged crime and do not fit into the rule's exceptions. |
City of Harwood, et al. v. The City of Reiles Acres,et al.(cross-ref w/20130309)
2015 ND 33
Highlight: A district court has subject matter jurisdiction to construe a contract in a declaratory judgment action and to consider partition claims. |
Runge v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 32
Highlight: A violation of the rules of professional conduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence. |
State v. Glaser
2015 ND 31
Highlight: When a statutory definition is limited by prefatory language such as "in this title" or "for the purposes of this title," there is an expressly evidenced intent that the definition have no application beyond that act. |
Waslaski v. State
2015 ND 30 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Apland
2015 ND 29
Highlight: A factual challenge made against evidence obtained through an alleged unconstitutional warrantless search, which establishes probable cause in an affidavit used to secure a search warrant, may be considered at an evidentiary hearing. |
Mackey v. State (cross-ref. w/20120119, 20100337)
2015 ND 28 Highlight: District court orders denying application for post-conviction relief and denying motion to reopen judgment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
State v. Beylund
2015 ND 27 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Culver v. Levi
2015 ND 26 Highlight: Appeal from judgment affirming decision of the Department of Transportation to suspend driving privileges for 91 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Haugen v. Simmons
2015 ND 25 Highlight: A primary residential responsibility determination is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of D.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Cons. w/20140457, 20140465, & 20140466)
2015 ND 24 Highlight: A district court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Huffman Inc. v. WSI
2015 ND 23 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order finding Huffco's drivers are employees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Rath v. Rath (Cross-ref. w/20130025, 20130184, 20130327 & 20140012)
2015 ND 22 Highlight: A district court order denying Mark Rath's motion to vacate the judgment and orders is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (7). |
Winarske v. State (consolidated w/20140113-20140118)
2015 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Johnson
2015 ND 19 Highlight: A district court order revoking probation and sentencing a defendant is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Beylund v. Levi
2015 ND 18 Highlight: The implied consent laws do not violate the Fourth Amendment, under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. |
Disciplinary Board v. Stanley
2015 ND 17 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Law v. Whittet, et al. (cross-reference w/20130241 & 20140248)
2015 ND 16
Highlight: A district court amended judgment will be reversed and remanded for failure to follow the mandate of the Supreme Court. |
State v. Galvez
2015 ND 14
Highlight: Under the Equal Protection Clause, the use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors solely on the basis of their gender is unconstitutional. |
Mertz v. Mertz
2015 ND 13
Highlight: Comprehensive analysis under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines is emphasized over the disadvantaged spouse doctrine, which has been eliminated. |
Interest of L.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 12
Highlight: A district court's finding that a person is chemically dependent and requires treatment will not be reversed unless it is clearly erroneous. |
State v. Kovalevich
2015 ND 11
Highlight: A criminal defendant must raise post-trial arguments about alleged discovery violations in a motion for a new trial. |
Combs v. Lund
2015 ND 10
Highlight: A respondent's right to due process is violated by a disorderly conduct restraining order that creates a right of review in a divorce proceeding to which the respondent is not a party. |
Keller v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 9 Highlight: The failure of law enforcement to forward the results of a drug analytical report of a blood sample to the Department of Transportation does not deprive the Department of its authority to suspend an individual's driving privileges for driving under the influence of alcohol. |
State v. Washburn
2015 ND 8 Highlight: An order dismissing a criminal prosecution for refusing to submit to a chemical test for intoxication is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
Johnson v. State
2015 ND 7 Highlight: A petitioner must provide evidentiary support that the petitioner was innocent to satisfy the newly discovered evidence exception to the two-year time limit for applying for post-conviction relief. |
State v. Birchfield
2015 ND 6 |
Ratchenski v. Lindell, et al.
2015 ND 5 Highlight: Order denying parent's motion for parenting time summarily .affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Evans
2015 ND 4 Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Interest of M.S. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref w/ 20140304)
2015 ND 3 Highlight: Order modifying an alternate treatment order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of E.L. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 2 Highlight: A district court order for involuntary treatment with medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Brossart (CONSOLIDATED W/ 20140027)
2015 ND 1
Highlight: The First Amendment precludes states from enacting laws "abridging the freedom of speech," but not all speech is protected, and speech that is a "true threat" may be restricted. |
Guardianship and Conservatorship of J.G.S.
2014 ND 239
Highlight: A conservatorship is designed to protect the property of a person who is under disability and, as such, unable to maintain his or her property. |
Chornuk, et al. v. Nelson, et al. (cross-ref. w/20120071)
2014 ND 238
Highlight: A party who pays a judgment against him under coercion or duress does not waive the right to appeal from the judgment. |
Estate of Pedro
2014 ND 237
Highlight: Under the probate code, a personal representative has certain duties regarding the inventory and appraisement and, when appropriate, to provide a supplementary inventory. |
Across Big Sky Flow Testing, LLC v. WSI, et al.
2014 ND 236 Highlight: For a workers compensation claim, where expert medical testimony is desirable, if not essential, to determining causation, an ALJ may not reject competent medical testimony without adequate explanation. |
Grossman v. Lerud
2014 ND 235 Highlight: For imputation of income to an underemployed obligor under the child support guidelines, a court may consider only the North Dakota statewide average earnings of an occupation, and an obligor may dispute that employment opportunities are available within one hundred miles of the obligor's actual place of residence. |
McCarthy v. McCarthy
2014 ND 234 Highlight: In a divorce, a property division need not be equal to be equitable, but a substantial disparity must be explained. |
Sorum v. Dalrymple, et al.
2014 ND 233 Highlight: All provisions of election law are mandatory if enforcement is sought prior to an election, and directory in support of the result after an election unless of a character to effect an obstruction to the free and intelligent casting of the vote, or to the ascertainment of the result, or unless the provisions affect an essential element of the election. |
Deeth v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 232
Highlight: If a person's driver's license is revoked for refusing to submit to an alcohol test, the only facts that must be proven are those that establish probable cause to believe the offense has been committed, arrest for the offense, and refusal of the test after the implied consent advisory. |
Deckert v. McCormick, et al.
2014 ND 231
Highlight: To obtain an enforceable right to the property under an option, the optionee must exercise the option within the time and upon the terms and conditions provided in the option agreement. |
State v. Horn
2014 ND 230
Highlight: Even if a party has raised an unsuccessful challenge in a pretrial motion, in order to preserve the issue for appeal, the party must renew the objection when the evidence is offered at trial. |
Frey v. Frey (cross-reference w/20120378)
2014 ND 229
Highlight: A district court's denial of a motion to modify primary residential responsibility will be affirmed, unless clearly erroneous. |
State v. Brandborg
2014 ND 228 Highlight: Hunting on posted land without permission in violation of N.D.C.C. 20.1-01-18 is a strict liability offense. |
Abelmann, et al. v. SmartLease USA, L.L.C.
2014 ND 227 Highlight: A district court's factual findings must be adequate to understand the basis for the court's decision. |
Podrygula, et al. v. Bray, et al.
2014 ND 226
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
Schmitt, et al. v. Schmitt, et al.
2014 ND 225 Highlight: Without a transcript, the record is considered when reviewing whether a district court's findings are clearly erroneous. |
State v. Nagel
2014 ND 224 Highlight: There is no logical difference between a pre-arrest onsite screening test and a post-arrest chemical test in terms of determining voluntariness of consent under the implied consent statute. |