Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3101 - 3150 of 12418 results
Mowan v. Berg
2015 ND 95 Highlight: If competent evidence of domestic violence does not trigger the statutory presumption, the violence must be considered as one factor in deciding primary residential responsibility. |
Hall v. Malloy, et al.
2015 ND 94
Highlight: An instrument may include a judgment for purposes of the after-acquired title doctrine. |
Moe v. State
2015 ND 93
Highlight: The purpose of an appeal is to review the actions of the district court, not to give the appellant an opportunity to develop new strategies or theories. |
Matter of Loy
2015 ND 92
Highlight: A licensure under probation with the State Board of Psychologist Examiners meets the statutory and evidentiary standard required to testify, and a witness's probationary status is an issue of weight and credibility of the testimony and not an issue of admissibility. |
Interest of T.J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20140363 & 20140364)
2015 ND 91 Highlight: Order placing child in custody of Department of Corrections is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Complete Plumbing Services, Inc. v. Brenna
2015 ND 90 Highlight: Money judgment requiring payment for unpaid costs of work and materials is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 4, Northeast Central Judicial District
2015 ND 89 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Grand Forks. |
Tresenriter v. State
2015 ND 88 Highlight: Order dismissing an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Parizek v. State
2015 ND 87 Highlight: Order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Mesch v. Levi
2015 ND 86 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 180 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of M.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 85 Highlight: A district court order for involuntary treatment with medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of D.V.A. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref 20030304, 20080319, 20100091)
2015 ND 84 Highlight: Orders denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Curtiss v. State
2015 ND 83 Highlight: Order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Interest of Hoff (cross-reference w/ 20120248, 20130216 & 20130323)
2015 ND 82 Highlight: A district court's findings of fact and order denying discharge and order for continued commitment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Keller v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 81
Highlight: Fair administration of an Intoxilyzer test may be established by proof that the approved method for conducting the test has been scrupulously followed. |
State v. Trimble
2015 ND 80 Highlight: Revocation of the defendant's probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Pegg v. Kohn, et al.
2015 ND 79
Highlight: A partnership agreement may be oral. |
Ruddell v. State
2015 ND 78 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Service Oil, Inc., et al. v. Gjestvang, et al.
2015 ND 77
Highlight: No damages can be recovered for a breach of contract if not clearly ascertainable in both nature and origin. |
Jordet v. Jordet, et al.
2015 ND 76
Highlight: Conversion is the wrongful exercise of dominion or control over property inconsistent with or in defiance of the rights of the owner. |
City of Napoleon v. Kuhn
2015 ND 75
Highlight: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to convict, an appellate court looks only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom to see whether there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction. |
State, et al. v. Lavallie
2015 ND 74 Highlight: A child support order issued by another state, not challenged within 20 days of being registered for enforcement in this state, is confirmed by operation of law. |
Jordet v. Jordet (cross-ref w/20120185)
2015 ND 73
Highlight: The appealability of an order will be considered even if neither party raises the issue on appeal. |
State v. Dahl
2015 ND 72
Highlight: Probable cause to support the issuance of a search warrant for a defendant's luggage is reviewed under the "totality of the circumstances." |
Interest of Johnson (cross-reference w/20120364)
2015 ND 71
Highlight: For civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, substantive due process requires proof that the individual has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. |
Hankey v. Hankey
2015 ND 70
Highlight: Whether a moving party has established a prima facie case for a modification of primary residential responsibility is a question of law reviewed under the de novo standard of review. |
Lavallie v. Lavallie
2015 ND 69 Highlight: A state district court and a tribal court may have concurrent subject-matter jurisdiction to determine an obligor's child support obligation. |
State v. Owens (consolidated w/20140143)
2015 ND 68
Highlight: Analysis of a speedy trial claim requires balancing the length of a delay, the reason for the delay, a proper assertion of the right to a speedy trial, and actual prejudice to the accused. |
Holkesvig v. Rost, et al.
2015 ND 67 Highlight: A continued and clear pattern of bringing frivolous and repetitious litigation may result in a requirement of prior approval for commencing further actions. |
State v. Steen
2015 ND 66
Highlight: Even if there was a pretrial motion, failure to object at trial waives the claim of error unless it amounts to an obvious error affecting the substantial rights of the defendant. |
Eggers v. Eggers
2015 ND 65 Highlight: A parent with primary residential responsibility does not need court approval to change the primary residence of the child to another state when the other parent has moved outside the state and lives more than fifty miles from the residence of the parent with primary residential responsibility. The parent need not change legal residence for waiver of a court order, only move outside the state. |
State v. Barnes
2015 ND 64 Highlight: A voluntary guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defects alleged to have occurred prior to the guilty plea, including alleged violations of constitutional rights. |
Rencountre v. State (cross-ref. w/20110157)
2015 ND 62
Highlight: Proof of ineffective assistance of counsel based on an attorney's failure to file a pretrial suppression motion requires the defendant prove he would have prevailed on his motion to suppress and that there is a reasonable probability a successful motion would have affected the outcome of the trial. |
State v. Berg (consolidated w/ 20140176)
2015 ND 61 Highlight: A party who voluntarily pleads guilty, knowingly waives a previously raised factual dispute regarding the statute of limitations. |
Irwin, et al. v. City of Minot
2015 ND 60 Highlight: A police power taking of property by a public entity in a sudden emergency requires the entity show there was an actual necessity to take the property to prevent the imminent peril. |
State v. Booth (consolidated w/20140257 & 20140258)
2015 ND 59 Highlight: By voluntarily pleading guilty, a defendant waives any procedural defects in applying a habitual offender sentence enhancement. |
Flynn, et al. v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 58
Highlight: In a nuisance action, in balancing the utility of the defendant's conduct against the harm to the plaintiff, the property owner's conduct at issue in the balancing test is the invasive conduct that is alleged to constitute the nuisance, not conduct of the defendant in the community at large unrelated to the challenged conduct. |
Baker v. Autos, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 57
Highlight: A district court may permit class certification if the numerosity, commonality, fair and efficient adjudication, and adequate representation factors are met. Thirteen sub-factors are used to help determine the fair and efficient adjudication factor. |
State v. Eaglechasing
2015 ND 56 Highlight: A criminal judgment for terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Otto v. State
2015 ND 55 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Myers v. State
2015 ND 54 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Pederson v. State
2015 ND 53 Highlight: A district court's dismissal with prejudice of a post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Daye
2015 ND 52 Highlight: Criminal judgment for reckless endangerment and fleeing a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Nails v. US Bank (USA) N.A.
2015 ND 51 Highlight: Judgment of dissmissal of lawsuit is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). |
Wojahn v. Levi
2015 ND 50 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Kirkpatrick v. State (cross-reference w/20110312)
2015 ND 49 Highlight: A district court judgment denying postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Holkesvig v. Hutton, et al.
2015 ND 48 Highlight: Judgment dismissing complaint without prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Owens v. State
2015 ND 47 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Romero v. State (cross-reference w/20110337)
2015 ND 46 Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Harns
2015 ND 45 Highlight: Driving under the influence conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |