Opinions

Disciplinary Board v. Hawkins 2001 ND 55
Docket No.: 20000233
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An attorney who is disciplined in another jurisdiction is also subject to reciprocal discipline in North Dakota if admitted to practice law in North Dakota, regardless of whether the attorney currently is licensed to practice law in North Dakota.
Reciprocal discipline shall be identical in this state, unless the proceedings in the jurisdiction initiating the discipline lack due process or proof of misconduct, or unless identical punishment would result in grave injustice or the misconduct warrants substantially different discipline.
An attorney is not denied due process in disciplinary proceedings if there is adequate notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard.
Imposing identical reciprocal discipline is not a grave injustice when an attorney is not licensed in North Dakota and does not intend to reapply for licensure.

Rogstad v. Dakota Gasification Co. 2001 ND 54
Docket No.: 20000242
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: An employer who retains the right to control the method, manner, and operative detail of an independent contractor's work is subject to liability for physical harm to employees of the independent contractor for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care.
An employer's duty to exercise reasonable care for the employee of an independent contractor may arise through express contractual provisions retaining the right to control some part of the operative details of the independent contractor's work or through the employer's actual exercise of retained control of the work.

Estate of Dion 2001 ND 53
Docket No.: 20000178
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An assertion that an action is one against a political subdivision and that prospective jurors are taxpayers of the political subdivision is insufficient in itself to effect a change of venue.
A court has no power to order a person to execute a will.
For the issue of undue influence to be submitted to a jury, the evidence must create more than just a mere suspicion of undue activity.
A will contestant has the burden of proving testamentary incapacity by a preponderance of the evidence.
An award of attorney fees for a frivolous claim lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.

Global Acquisitions, LLC v. Broadway Park Limited Partnership, et al. 2001 ND 52
Docket No.: 20000132
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: In a bench trial, the court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to enable the appellate court to understand the factual determination and the basis for the conclusions of law and the judgment entered.
Reliance on the conduct of the party against whom equitable estoppel is asserted must be reasonable, and there must be some form of affirmative deception by that party.

McPhee, et al. v. Tufty, et al. 2001 ND 51
Docket No.: 20000047
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Whether the family car doctrine applies depends on the totality of the circumstances, and is a question of fact for the trier of fact to decide.
In deciding whether a vehicle was "used" by an insured when a third party was actually driving the insured's vehicle, courts analyze two factors: (1) whether the vehicle was under the supervision and control of the insured; and (2) whether the vehicle was being operated to serve a purpose of the insured.
Coverage of a newly acquired vehicle is automatic if notice is given within 30 days of its acquisition.

Dvorak v. State 2001 ND 50
Docket No.: 20000352
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An appeal from denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

State v. Knudson 2001 ND 49
Docket No.: 20000238
Filing Date: 3/20/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The trial court's denial of a motion to suppress and its judgment of conviction for driving under suspension are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(7).

Fetch v. Quam, et al. (cross ref. 940257) 2001 ND 48
Docket No.: 20000256
Filing Date: 3/7/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Summary judgment is appropriately granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact that an insurer acted in bad faith by intervening in a lawsuit to defend its own interests against its insured under an uninsured motorist provision in the insurance policy or by investigating and refusing to settle a claim by its insured which is fairly debatable as to liability.

Lukenbill, et al. v. Fettig 2001 ND 47
Docket No.: 20000184
Filing Date: 3/5/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: In setting a child support obligation, the district court must clearly set forth how it arrived at the amount of the obligor's income and level of support.
A court may allocate income tax dependency exemptions, and its allocation is reviewable under a "clearly erroneous" standard of review.
When determining the existence or nonexistence of a parent-child relationship, a court may order parties to pay costs in the proportions it determines, and may award reasonable attorney fees based on the agreement of the parties or for a frivolous claim.

Hall Family Living Trust v. Mutual Service Life Ins. Co. 2001 ND 46
Docket No.: 20000188
Filing Date: 3/5/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: An application for insurance stating the policy does not take effect until delivery creates no insurance contract until the policy is delivered.
The scope of an agent's authority to bind a principal is a question of fact which ordinarily is inappropriate for summary judgment.