Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3151 - 3200 of 12359 results
Guardianship of P.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20140167-20140170)
2014 ND 223
Highlight: Although it is preferable for trial courts to prepare their own findings of fact, a trial court will not be reversed for adopting proposed findings prepared by counsel. |
George v. George
2014 ND 222 Highlight: A district court has permissive or non-mandatory authority to grant a restraining order if it finds reasonable grounds to believe a respondent has engaged in disorderly conduct. |
Albrecht v. Albrecht
2014 ND 221 Highlight: A party's death before entry of a final divorce judgment abates a divorce action. |
Coss v. Levi
2014 ND 220 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Interest of D.C.
2014 ND 219 Highlight: An involuntary treatment with medication order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Greybear v. State
2014 ND 218 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Bentz v. State
2014 ND 217 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Connelley v. Connelley
2014 ND 216 Highlight: Appeal from amended divorce judgment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Vivatson v. Haugen, et al.
2014 ND 215 Highlight: A primary residential responsibility determination is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Luger v. State
2014 ND 214 Highlight: A district court order denying application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Thorson v. State
2014 ND 213 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of B.B.P. (Confidential)(consolidated w/20140375 & 20140376)
2014 ND 212 Highlight: Order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Nguyen (cross-ref. w/20130159)
2014 ND 211 Highlight: A district court order deferring imposition of sentence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Nilles, Ilvedson, Plambeck & Selbo, Ltd., v. Langer
2014 ND 210 Highlight: An order denying relief from judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). |
State v. Yost (consolidated w/20140070 & 20140071)
2014 ND 209
Highlight: Sentencing is a critical stage at which a defendant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel. |
Harvey v. Harvey
2014 ND 208
Highlight: A district court does not necessarily err by failing to find a primary caretaker of a child. |
State v. Leppert
2014 ND 207 Highlight: A noncriminal traffic case may not be appealed to the Supreme Court. |
State v. Reddig
2014 ND 206 Highlight: District court judgment denying motion to withdraw guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Matter of Aune
2014 ND 205 Highlight: A district court order civilly committing an individual as a sexually dangerous offender is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Ayala v. State
2014 ND 204 Highlight: A district court order denying application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Jones
2014 ND 203 Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver within 1,000 feet of a school and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Murphy
2014 ND 202
Highlight: A district court is allowed a wide range of discretion in fixing a criminal sentence. Appellate review of a criminal sentence is generally confined to whether the district court acted within the sentencing limits set by statute, or substantially relied upon an impermissible factor. |
Capps, et al. v. Weflen, et al. (cross-ref. w/20120184)
2014 ND 201
Highlight: Under the abandoned mineral statutes, a surface owner is required to conduct a reasonable inquiry only if the mineral owner's address does not appear of record, even if the surface owner knows the mineral owner whose address appears of record is deceased. |
Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLC, et al.
2014 ND 200
Highlight: The district court has personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant if the nonresident defendant committed a tort within or outside the state causing injury to another person or property within the state and the exercise of personal jurisdiction comports with due process. |
Wilson v. Wilson
2014 ND 199
Highlight: The district court may order past child support covering a period when the parties are separated but divorce proceedings are not pending. |
State v. Schneider
2014 ND 198 Highlight: A law enforcement officer's following with flashing lights a moving vehicle constitutes a pursuit, which constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. No seizure occurs if the defendant does not move his vehicle and the officer does not pursue him with flashing lights. |
MKB Management Corp, et al. v. Burdick, et al.
2014 ND 197
Highlight: The concurrence of four of the five justices of the North Dakota Supreme Court is necessary to declare a statute unconstitutional. |
Interest of J.A.H. (Consolidated w/20140146)
2014 ND 196 Highlight: When a juvenile court provides insufficient findings to review, jurisdiction may be retained under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and the case remanded with instructions that the juvenile court make expedited findings of fact. |
State v. Fetch
2014 ND 195
Highlight: A driver who has refused a chemical test but later changes his mind and consents to the test can cure the prior refusal. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20100230 & 20120175)
2014 ND 194
Highlight: In proceedings for commitment of a sexually dangerous individual, the committed individual has a right to obtain individually identifiable health information and any confidential records provided to the state's attorney. |
State v. Patterson
2014 ND 193
Highlight: While a prosecutor's improper suggestions, insinuations, and, especially, assertions of personal knowledge are apt to carry much weight against the accused when they should properly carry none, inappropriate prosecutorial comments, standing alone, would not justify a reviewing court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al.
2014 ND 192
Highlight: The N.D. Rules of Court are ambiguous as to whether facsimile transmission is an acceptable method of filing for self-represented litigants. |
State v. Everett (Cross-ref.w/20070074, 20080063, 20090244, 20100222, 20100392)
2014 ND 191 Highlight: An order denying a petition alleging abuse of process and violation of due process in a criminal conviction for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6) and (7). |
State v. Tosseth
2014 ND 190 Highlight: A district court denial of a motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). |
State v. Tveito
2014 ND 189 Highlight: A district court denial of a motion to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol test is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Tveito v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 188 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's order suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5), (7). |
Ruddell v. State (cross reference with 20120369)
2014 ND 187 Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Pankowski v. State
2014 ND 186 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Hamilton, et al., v. Woll, et al. (cross-ref. w/20120269)
2014 ND 185 Highlight: A judgment construing deeds and quieting title is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, Northeast Central Judicial District (cross ref. 352)
2014 ND 184 Highlight: Judgeships retained at Grand Forks. |
Matter of Carter (CONFIDENTIAL)
2014 ND 183 Highlight: Lawyer transferred to incapacitated status. |
Crocker, et al. v. Morales-Santana, et al.
2014 ND 182
Highlight: A motor carrier may be vicariously liable for the negligence of its statutory employees. |
Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co., et al.
2014 ND 181
Highlight: A mortgage is a contract and is construed under rules of contract interpretation. |
State v. Ostby
2014 ND 180
Highlight: An order denying a suppression motion is not appealable in itself, but is reviewable in an appeal from the subsequently entered criminal judgment. |
Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. Ganske, et al.
2014 ND 179
Highlight: If a party's apparent free consent to a contract has been obtained by fraud, the defrauded party may rescind the contract. |
Interest of Voisine (cross-ref. w/20090182, 20100163 & 20120325)
2014 ND 178 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Grzeskowiak (cross reference w/20130396)
2014 ND 177 Highlight: Denial of a motion for an extension of time to file an appeal of a criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Disciplinary Board v. Meidinger
2014 ND 176 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Western Horizons Living Centers v. Feland, et al.
2014 ND 175
Highlight: The Supreme Court exercises discretionary authority to issue supervisory writs rarely and cautiously to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases in which no adequate alterative remedy exists. |
Lindsey v. State
2014 ND 174
Highlight: The affirmative defense of laches, when properly raised and supported, presents a question of fact and is inappropriate for a district court to decide on summary judgment. |