Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3251 - 3300 of 12382 results
Finstad, et al. v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., et al.
2014 ND 146
Highlight: North Dakota law does not recognize the economic duress doctrine. |
Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis
2014 ND 145
Highlight: Duress occurs when an individual acts as a result of coercion or when the individual's actions are involuntary. |
Middleton v. State
2014 ND 144
Highlight: To demonstrate prejudice in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the defendant must establish a reasonable probability that but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different, and the defendant must specify how and where trial counsel was incompetent and the probable different result. |
Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. Mesling, et al.
2014 ND 143
Highlight: A power of attorney is a written instrument that authorizes one person to act as another person's agent. An agency created under a durable power of attorney also entails a confidential relationship and fiduciary duties. |
Vetter v. State (cross-reference w/20120015)
2014 ND 142 Highlight: An order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Comes v. State
2014 ND 141 Highlight: Summary disposition of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Towry
2014 ND 140 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Reciprocal Discipline of Wynne
2014 ND 139 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Hering v. WSI, et al.
2014 ND 138 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order denying benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Hann v. Disciplinary Board
2014 ND 137 Highlight: Lawyer reinstated. |
State v. Cook
2014 ND 136
Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust
2014 ND 135
Highlight: A district court has discretion to determine claims are frivolous and order payment of attorney's fees. |
State v. Rogers
2014 ND 134
Highlight: Whether a suspect is in custody, and therefore entitled to Miranda warnings, is a mixed question of fact and law which is fully reviewable on appeal. |
Lund v. Lund, et al. (cross reference with 20120210)
2014 ND 133
Highlight: Whether an implied-in-fact contract existed between parties is a question of fact subject to the clearly erroneous rule. |
Mairs v. Mairs
2014 ND 132
Highlight: Any issue regarding whether a prima facie case has been established for modification of primary residential responsibility is moot once an evidentiary hearing is held. |
Pokrzywinski v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 131
Highlight: A report and notice form that includes the driver crashed, an odor of alcoholic beverage was detected, and the driver admitted consuming alcohol may be sufficient to support an officer's reasonable grounds to believe a driver operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. |
State v. Cone
2014 ND 130
Highlight: A district court has discretion in applying a remedy for a discovery violation, and a court's decision not to exclude evidence or impose another sanction does not constitute an abuse of discretion unless the defendant shows he was significantly prejudiced by the violation. |
Herrman v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 129
Highlight: Constitutional questions will not be decided on appeal if a dispute may be decided on other grounds. |
C&C Plumbing and Heating, LLP v. Williams County, et al.
2014 ND 128
Highlight: If a party fails to plead and adequately brief unconscionability to the district court, the issue will not be considered on appeal. |
Meier v. Meier
2014 ND 127 Highlight: A motion for relief from judgment must be made within a reasonable time. |
Hale, et al. v. Ward County, et al. (cross-ref. w/20110171)
2014 ND 126
Highlight: A private person may maintain an action for a public nuisance if the public nuisance is specially injurious to that person or that person's property, but not otherwise. |
Chisholm v. State
2014 ND 125
Highlight: A district court may summarily deny a meritless application for post-conviction relief if the claims in the application are facially invalid. |
State v. Daniels
2014 ND 124
Highlight: The scope of consent is measured objectively by what a reasonable person would have understood by the exchange between the police and the suspect. |
Tank v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp., et al.
2014 ND 123
Highlight: A Pugh clause in an oil and gas lease severs a lease where less than all of the leasehold is included in a single unit and allows the lease to expire on a portion of the leased property if certain conditions are met. |
Devine v. Hennessee
2014 ND 122
Highlight: To properly determine an obligor's child support obligation, income must be sufficiently documented through the use of tax returns, current wage statements, and other information to fully apprise the court of all gross income. |
Keltner v. Levi
2014 ND 121 Highlight: District court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Hinojosa v. State
2014 ND 120 Highlight: Appeal from denial of petition for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
McCoy v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 119
Highlight: A law enforcement officer's administration of a breath test to determine alcohol consumption is a search. |
Interest of J.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-ref. w/20050383, 20100398, 20120253)
2014 ND 118 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Winarske v. State
2014 ND 117 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Frith v. WSI, et al.
2014 ND 116 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order denying benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Medalen v. Medalen
2014 ND 114 Highlight: An amended judgment finding a party in contempt of court and ordering her to pay costs and expenses is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Thomas
2014 ND 113 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of arson and endangering by fire or explosion is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
IRET Properties v. Tano, et al.
2014 ND 112 Highlight: Order denying motion to vacate or set aside default judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Francis v. Francis
2014 ND 111 Highlight: A domestic violence advocate is limited to participating in proceedings only to the extent provided for in N.D. Supreme Court Administrative Rule 34, section 5. |
Disciplinary Board v. Lawler (Consol. w/ 20140054-20140062
2014 ND 110 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
State v. Brown
2014 ND 108 Highlight: Convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Schlieve v. Schlieve
2014 ND 107
Highlight: A court's award of primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous or it is not sufficiently specific to show the factual basis for the decision. |
Schroeder v. Schroeder
2014 ND 106 Highlight: An evidentiary hearing for modification of primary residential responsibility is appropriate only if a prima facie case is established for both a material change in circumstances and modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Gruebele, et al.
2014 ND 105 Highlight: Negligence imputed to a parent after signing his or her minor child's driver's license application sponsorship form does not automatically create coverage under the signing parent's insurance contract. |
State v. Roe
2014 ND 104
Highlight: Generally, parties or their counsel may stipulate as to evidentiary matters such as the admission, exclusion or withdrawal of evidence, but stipulations that are clearly against public policy will not be validated. |
Lehman v. State
2014 ND 103
Highlight: Generally, an application for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years of the date the conviction becomes final. |
Datz v. Dosch (cross-reference w/ 20120167 & 20120435)
2014 ND 102
Highlight: The Supreme Court retains jurisdiction until the mandate is issued. |
State v. Kalmio
2014 ND 101
Highlight: Standing objections must be sufficiently definite to preserve the issues for judicial review. |
State v. Gates
2014 ND 99 Highlight: Criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Voisine v. State
2014 ND 98 Highlight: Appeal from denial of petition for postconviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State ex rel. Storbakken v. Scott's Electric
2014 ND 97
Highlight: Arguments not raised before the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. |
State v. Simmons
2014 ND 96 Highlight: Order revoking probation summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Kuruc (consolidated w/ 20130337)
2014 ND 95
Highlight: The independent-source doctrine allows the introduction of evidence that was initially discovered during, or as a result of an unlawful search, but that was later obtained independently from lawful activities that have not been tainted by the initial illegality. |
Tharaldson Ethanol Plant I, LLC, et al. v. VEI Global, Inc.
2014 ND 94
Highlight: Certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) should rarely be granted and is reserved for cases involving unusual circumstances in which failure to allow an immediate appeal would create a demonstrated prejudice or hardship. |