Opinions

State v. Cook 2014 ND 18
Docket No.: 20130277
Filing Date: 2/10/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. When an appellant fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so that meaningful review of his issues is impossible, the appeal may be dismissed.

Disciplinary Board v. Howe 2014 ND 17
Docket No.: 20140035
Filing Date: 1/31/2014
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Interim suspension vacated.

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD 2014 ND 16
Docket No.: 20140003
Filing Date: 1/30/2014
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgeship retained at Linton.

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, ECJD 2014 ND 15
Docket No.: 20140008
Filing Date: 1/28/2014
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgeship retained in Fargo.

State v. Holbach (cross-reference w/ 20120155 & 20120215) 2014 ND 14
Docket No.: 20130016
Filing Date: 1/28/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of defendants who, as a result of a mental disease or defect, lack capacity to understand the proceedings against them or to assist in their defense.
Defendants found not competent to stand trial may be committed to the State Hospital under the statutory procedures and safeguards for civil commitment.

Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al. 2014 ND 13
Docket No.: 20130225
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation.
A party seeking modification of a child support obligation has the burden of proving the existing amount of support does not conform to the guidelines.

Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine 2014 ND 12
Docket No.: 20130157
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense.
A party relying on a force majeure clause to excuse performance bears the burden of proving that the event was beyond its control and without its fault or negligence.
Appellant was not a prevailing plaintiff where the district court's award of partial damages to appellant was reversed on appeal.

Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen 2014 ND 11
Docket No.: 20130199
Filing Date: 1/17/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor.
In an action on an assigned claim, the assignee is ordinarily subject to any setoff or counterclaim available to the obligor against the assignor that could have been asserted against the assignor at the time of the assignment.

Phillips v. State 2014 ND 10
Docket No.: 20130151
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale V.

Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending.
When an indigent defendant has demonstrated a particularized need for a transcript, the district court abuses its discretion in denying his request for a free transcript.

Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas 2014 ND 9
Docket No.: 20130214
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being.

Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al. 2014 ND 8
Docket No.: 20130206
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call.

Trosen v. Trosen, et al. 2014 ND 7
Docket No.: 20130034
Filing Date: 1/4/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement.
Part performance of an agreement or contract for the leasing of property for longer than a one-year may bar the assertion of the statute of frauds.
To succeed on a claim of part performance, a party must first prove the circumstances of the case meet the general prerequisites to equitable relief and the party must show that the alleged part performance is consistent only with the existence of the alleged oral contract.

Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224) 2014 ND 6
Docket No.: 20130211
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so.

Conzemius v. Conzemius 2014 ND 5
Docket No.: 20130125
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property.
A party's income under the Child Support Guidelines will not necessarily be equal to the party's earning ability under a spousal support analysis.

State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168) 2014 ND 4
Docket No.: 20130165
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others.
A warrantless protective sweep of a home is not justified when officers rely on evidence seized from a different residence and the only connection between the two houses is the fact that one of the suspects was previously at the first residence searched and then left.

Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Peterson, et al. 2014 ND 3
Docket No.: 20130080
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court may award attorney fees for allegations and denials in any pleadings in court that are made without reasonable cause and not in good faith and are found to be untrue.

Lucas v. Lucas (cross-reference w/20110365) 2014 ND 2
Docket No.: 20130070
Filing Date: 1/14/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in making a primary residential responsibility decision, but the court must consider all of the relevant statutory best-interest factors in reaching its decision.
Although a separate finding is not required for each statutory best-interest factor, the district court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the primary residential responsibility decision.

Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (Consolidated w/ 20130344 & 20130345) 2014 ND 1
Docket No.: 20130343
Filing Date: 1/9/2014
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer disbarred.

Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111) 2013 ND 253
Docket No.: 20130110
Filing Date: 12/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The State of North Dakota owned mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upon admission to the Union, and the anti-gift clause of the state constitution precludes construing a statute as a gift of the State's mineral interests to upland owners.
Ownership of mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters may differ for individual upland owners.
If the chain of title reflects the State granted its equal footing interests to upland owners, those upland owners take to the low watermark, subject to the public trust doctrine and except where the deed provides otherwise.

State v. Nguyen 2013 ND 252
Docket No.: 20130159
Filing Date: 12/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search.

Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347) 2013 ND 251
Docket No.: 20130229
Filing Date: 12/24/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289) 2013 ND 250
Docket No.: 20130288
Filing Date: 12/23/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed.

Dominguez v. State 2013 ND 249
Docket No.: 20130098
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime.
Attempted murder committed under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life is not a cognizable offense, because the accused must have an intent to kill for attempted murder and murder under circumstance manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life results in an unintentional death.

Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al. 2013 ND 248
Docket No.: 20130156
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07.
A consideration clause in an agreement is presumptive evidence that consideration exists for the agreement.
Consideration may be executed or executory in whole or in part, so long as it was given in consideration of the agreement at issue.

Interest of D.O. (Confidential) 2013 ND 247
Docket No.: 20130174
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included.
All information providing probable cause must be considered together, and in a commonsense and realistic fashion.
The right to confrontation is a trial right and does not apply to the same extent in pretrial hearings.
The State must show reasonable grounds exist to transfer a juvenile's case to the district court.

Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010) 2013 ND 246
Docket No.: 20120447
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance.
Resentencing under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35 is proper in order to correct an illegal sentence.
Probationary sentences for conviction of the crime of failure to register as a sexual offender are imposed under N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-15(9), not N.D.C.C. 12.1-32-06.1(3).

Krueger v. Krueger (Cross-reference w/20070196) 2013 ND 245
Docket No.: 20130129
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A party seeking a contempt sanction must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed. An inability to comply with an order is a defense to contempt proceedings, but the alleged contemnor has the burden to prove the defense.

Stensland v. Disciplinary Board 2013 ND 244
Docket No.: 20130008
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A suspended lawyer has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence the requisite honesty and integrity to be reinstated to the practice of law.
A suspended lawyer who is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and who makes false claims to the Supreme Court has failed to satisfy his burden for reinstatement.

Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20130327 & 20130025) 2013 ND 243
Docket No.: 20130184
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Technical violations of a court order do not necessarily require a finding of contempt.
A district court's decision on a motion for recusal is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.

State, et al. v. B.B., et al. (confidential) 2013 ND 242
Docket No.: 20130178
Filing Date: 12/13/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A paternity and support claim can be bifurcated from a related custody action.
A state district court has jurisdiction over a paternity and support action against a non-Indian.

Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners 2013 ND 241
Docket No.: 20130238
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision.
On appeal from a decision of a county board, a reconsideration of the evidence is limited to the extent that such evidence was presented to the county board, and the burden is on the moving party to show that the decision of the county board was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.
The moving party cannot turn an appeal from a denial of a change in zoning request into an inverse condemnation action.

Bahtiraj v. State 2013 ND 240
Docket No.: 20130113
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Without more, the second Strickland prong is not satisfied by a self-serving statement that the petitioner would have insisted on going to trial. Factors to consider when determining the rationality of rejecting a guilty plea and insisting on going to trial include immigration consequences, strength of the case against the petitioner, and rational defenses to the charged crime.

State v. Otto 2013 ND 239
Docket No.: 20130096
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to a readily mobile camper that is not in a place regularly used for residential purposes.

Kinsella v. State 2013 ND 238
Docket No.: 20130150
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Failure to move pretrial to suppress evidence, by itself, does not equate to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, but where counsel has no reason to question the search and seizure, failure to file a motion to suppress does not render the representation ineffective.

Morton County Social Service Board, et al. v. Houim 2013 ND 237
Docket No.: 20130095
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a party moves to modify primary residential responsibility of a child, the district court must consider only the party's motion on briefs, affidavits, and other supporting documents to determine whether the moving party established a prima facie case and is entitled to an evidentiary hearing.
Evidence that the child's present environment may endanger the child's health or evidence of a parent's suicide attempt constitute material changes of circumstance that may justify a modification of primary residential responsibility and establish a prima facie case.

State v. Canfield 2013 ND 236
Docket No.: 20130141
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An inadequate record may make appellate review of the district court's denial of a suppression motion impossible, thus requiring reversal and remand for further proceedings.

Parsons v. WSI 2013 ND 235
Docket No.: 20130197
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A claimant for workers' compensation benefits must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury.
If a claimant has a preexisting condition, but a preponderance of the evidence shows the medical condition for which benefits are being sought is causally related to a work injury and not attributable to a preexisting condition, the preexisting condition analysis to determine whether the injury is compensable does not apply.

State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile 2013 ND 234
Docket No.: 20130186
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Due process requires that a notice of forfeiture hearing be served on any interested party.
Mailing the required notice to an individual at a residential address, when that individual is presently incarcerated within the state, violates the individual's right to due process.

Matter of Muscha 2013 ND 233
Docket No.: 20130154
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order civilly committing appellant as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Fee (consol. 20130177) 2013 ND 232
Docket No.: 20130175
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment forfeiting property connected to criminal activity is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Ruddell 2013 ND 231
Docket No.: 20130209
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered for abandonment or nonsupport of a child is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Kippen (consolidated w/20130263) 2013 ND 230
Docket No.: 20130239
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Kaka 2013 ND 229
Docket No.: 20130158
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Johnson v. State 2013 ND 228
Docket No.: 20130228
Filing Date: 12/19/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Reciprocal Discipline of Murrin 2013 ND 227
Docket No.: 20130355
Filing Date: 12/18/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WSI, et al. 2013 ND 226
Docket No.: 20130185
Filing Date: 12/16/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order awarding benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

Vacancy in Judgeship No. 6, East Central Judicial District 2013 ND 225
Docket No.: 20130389
Filing Date: 12/10/2013
Case Type: Judicial Administration - Rule - Rule
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgeship retained at Fargo.

State v. Rau 2013 ND 224
Docket No.: 20130187
Filing Date: 12/10/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Kling 2013 ND 223
Docket No.: 20130103
Filing Date: 12/4/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment for disorderly conduct is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Disciplinary Board v. Craft 2013 ND 222
Docket No.: 20130318
Filing Date: 12/4/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.