Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3351 - 3400 of 12382 results
Coppage v. State (cross reference w/20070304, 20110076, & 20120267)
2014 ND 42
Highlight: Attempted murder under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life is not a cognizable offense. |
Osier v. State
2014 ND 41 Highlight: To meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland ineffective assistance of counsel test, the defendant bears the heavy burden of establishing a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
Peterson, et al. v. Jasmanka, et al.
2014 ND 40
Highlight: The statutory procedure in N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1 allowing a surface owner to acquire abandoned minerals is a separate, distinct procedure from a subsequent quiet title action. |
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-Renner, et al.
2014 ND 39
Highlight: The phrase "resident of your household" in an automobile insurance policy is not ambiguous, and the determination of whether a person falls within the meaning of the phrase is a question of fact. |
Zavadil, et al. v. Rud, et al.
2014 ND 38 Highlight: An accommodation party is obliged to pay an instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. |
Balvitsch, et al. v. Dakota Burger N Fries Corp., et al.
2014 ND 37
Highlight: Due process requires a contemnor receive notice and a fair hearing when the alleged contempt involves conduct outside the court's presence. |
Tweed v. State
2014 ND 36 Highlight: Appeal from denial of application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Shaft
2014 ND 35 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Anderson, et al. v. Zimbelman, et al.
2014 ND 34
Highlight: Constructive fraud requires a breach of duty leading to an advantage for the party misleading. The breach of duty generally arises from a confidential or fiduciary relationship between the parties. |
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagar
2014 ND 33 Highlight: A judge may be suspended without pay for a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. |
Interest of G.R. (Confidential)
2014 ND 32
Highlight: In termination of parental rights cases, the petitioner must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child is deprived, the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. |
Matter of Mangelsen
2014 ND 31 Highlight: For civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, the conduct relied upon to demonstrate the individual's serious difficulty controlling his behavior need not be sexual in nature. |
State v. Reis (consol. w/ 20130193 & 20130194)
2014 ND 30
Highlight: A police officer may search a vehicle without a warrant if there is probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband. |
Estate of Huston
2014 ND 29
Highlight: An order denying a petition to remove a personal representative in the unsupervised probate of an estate is appealable without a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b). |
Interest of R.L.-P. (consolidated w/ 20130383-20130386 & 20130388)
2014 ND 28
Highlight: Parental rights may be terminated when the children are deprived and have been in foster care more than 450 out of the previous 660 nights. |
Delaney v. State
2014 ND 27 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Brockel v. WSI
2014 ND 26
Highlight: Until proper notice is given, Workforce Safety and Insurance cannot terminate disability benefits on the basis that the claimant failed to verify disability. |
Bredeson v. Mackey
2014 ND 25
Highlight: Marriage of one or both parents may constitute a change of circumstances that is not material and therefore does not require modification of parenting time. |
Wampler v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 24
Highlight: The Department of Transportation must meet the basic and mandatory provisions of N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1 to have authority to suspend a person's driving privileges. |
Hamre v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 23
Highlight: A person appealing to the district court from a Department of Transportation decision to suspend privileges must comply with the specifications of error requirements under N.D.C.C. 28-32-42(4). |
Brandt v. Brandt
2014 ND 22 Highlight: Divorce judgment distributing parties' marital property and order denying post-judgment motion are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Swearingen v. State (cross-ref. w/20130063)
2014 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Oie v. State
2014 ND 20 Highlight: District court judgment denying application for postconviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Summers (Consolidated w/ 20130415 & 20130416)
2014 ND 19 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
State v. Cook
2014 ND 18 Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. When an appellant fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so that meaningful review of his issues is impossible, the appeal may be dismissed. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 17 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 16 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Linton. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, ECJD
2014 ND 15 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Fargo. |
State v. Holbach (cross-reference w/ 20120155 & 20120215)
2014 ND 14
Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of defendants who, as a result of a mental disease or defect, lack capacity to understand the proceedings against them or to assist in their defense. |
Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al.
2014 ND 13
Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation. |
Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine
2014 ND 12
Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense. |
Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen
2014 ND 11
Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor. |
Phillips v. State
2014 ND 10
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas
2014 ND 9 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being. |
Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al.
2014 ND 8 Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call. |
Trosen v. Trosen, et al.
2014 ND 7
Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement. |
Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224)
2014 ND 6 Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so. |
Conzemius v. Conzemius
2014 ND 5
Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property. |
State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168)
2014 ND 4
Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others. |
Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Peterson, et al.
2014 ND 3 Highlight: A district court may award attorney fees for allegations and denials in any pleadings in court that are made without reasonable cause and not in good faith and are found to be untrue. |
Lucas v. Lucas (cross-reference w/20110365)
2014 ND 2
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in making a primary residential responsibility decision, but the court must consider all of the relevant statutory best-interest factors in reaching its decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (Consolidated w/ 20130344 & 20130345)
2014 ND 1 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111)
2013 ND 253
Highlight: The State of North Dakota owned mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upon admission to the Union, and the anti-gift clause of the state constitution precludes construing a statute as a gift of the State's mineral interests to upland owners. |
State v. Nguyen
2013 ND 252 Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search. |
Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347)
2013 ND 251 Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289)
2013 ND 250 Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed. |
Dominguez v. State
2013 ND 249
Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime. |
Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al.
2013 ND 248
Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07. |
Interest of D.O. (Confidential)
2013 ND 247
Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included. |
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010)
2013 ND 246
Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance. |