Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3401 - 3450 of 12418 results
Delaney v. State
2014 ND 27 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Brockel v. WSI
2014 ND 26
Highlight: Until proper notice is given, Workforce Safety and Insurance cannot terminate disability benefits on the basis that the claimant failed to verify disability. |
Bredeson v. Mackey
2014 ND 25
Highlight: Marriage of one or both parents may constitute a change of circumstances that is not material and therefore does not require modification of parenting time. |
Wampler v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 24
Highlight: The Department of Transportation must meet the basic and mandatory provisions of N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1 to have authority to suspend a person's driving privileges. |
Hamre v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 23
Highlight: A person appealing to the district court from a Department of Transportation decision to suspend privileges must comply with the specifications of error requirements under N.D.C.C. 28-32-42(4). |
Brandt v. Brandt
2014 ND 22 Highlight: Divorce judgment distributing parties' marital property and order denying post-judgment motion are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Swearingen v. State (cross-ref. w/20130063)
2014 ND 21 Highlight: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Oie v. State
2014 ND 20 Highlight: District court judgment denying application for postconviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Summers (Consolidated w/ 20130415 & 20130416)
2014 ND 19 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
State v. Cook
2014 ND 18 Highlight: An appellant assumes the consequences and the risk for the failure to file a complete transcript. If the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of alleged error, the issue will not be reviewed. When an appellant fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so that meaningful review of his issues is impossible, the appeal may be dismissed. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2014 ND 17 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 16 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Linton. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, ECJD
2014 ND 15 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Fargo. |
State v. Holbach (cross-reference w/ 20120155 & 20120215)
2014 ND 14
Highlight: Due process prohibits the criminal prosecution of defendants who, as a result of a mental disease or defect, lack capacity to understand the proceedings against them or to assist in their defense. |
Schwalk v. Schwalk, et al.
2014 ND 13
Highlight: A hearing is not required by law to modify a child support obligation. |
Entzel v. Moritz Sport and Marine
2014 ND 12
Highlight: A force majeure clause is equivalent to an affirmative defense. |
Forbes Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Jensen
2014 ND 11
Highlight: An assignee acquires no greater rights than those of the assignor. |
Phillips v. State
2014 ND 10
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas
2014 ND 9 Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order can be sought only against a human being. |
Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al.
2014 ND 8 Highlight: A telephone call is not an appearance entitling a party to notice before entry of default judgment when the party speaks to no one and leaves only a recorded message stating his name and requesting a return call. |
Trosen v. Trosen, et al.
2014 ND 7
Highlight: To satisfy the statute of frauds, a writing must contain all of the essential or material terms and conditions of the contract, and parole evidence may not be used to supply a missing essential term of the agreement. |
Broadwell v. State (cross-reference w/20120224)
2014 ND 6 Highlight: Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so. |
Conzemius v. Conzemius
2014 ND 5
Highlight: A district court is not required to calculate speculative, distant future tax consequences when dividing marital property. |
State v. Hart (consolidated w/20130168)
2014 ND 4
Highlight: Police may conduct a warrantless protective sweep inside a home when officers possess a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, reasonably warrant the officer in believing that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to the officer or others. |
Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Peterson, et al.
2014 ND 3 Highlight: A district court may award attorney fees for allegations and denials in any pleadings in court that are made without reasonable cause and not in good faith and are found to be untrue. |
Lucas v. Lucas (cross-reference w/20110365)
2014 ND 2
Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in making a primary residential responsibility decision, but the court must consider all of the relevant statutory best-interest factors in reaching its decision. |
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson (Consolidated w/ 20130344 & 20130345)
2014 ND 1 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111)
2013 ND 253
Highlight: The State of North Dakota owned mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upon admission to the Union, and the anti-gift clause of the state constitution precludes construing a statute as a gift of the State's mineral interests to upland owners. |
State v. Nguyen
2013 ND 252 Highlight: The use of a drug-sniffing dog in a common hallway of a secured apartment building does not constitute an unreasonable search. |
Tollefson v. Bjornstad, et al. (cross-reference w/20120347)
2013 ND 251 Highlight: An order denying a motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to vacate prior orders entered in a civil RICO action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Disciplinary Board v. Hardwick (Consolidated w/ 20130289)
2013 ND 250 Highlight: Lawyer discipline imposed. |
Dominguez v. State
2013 ND 249
Highlight: To commit an attempt offense, the accused must have an intent to commit the underlying crime. |
Guthmiller Farms v. Guthmiller, et al.
2013 ND 248
Highlight: A limited liability partnership that loses its registration is still a partnership for the purposes of conducting business. A successor partnership has the ability to sue and be sued in the name of the partnership under N.D.C.C. 45-15-07. |
Interest of D.O. (Confidential)
2013 ND 247
Highlight: When a defendant argues false or misleading testimony was presented in support of a search warrant, a Franks hearing must be held to determine whether law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they were misleading. The affidavit also must not have been sufficient to support probable cause for the search warrant if omitted information had been included. |
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20130010)
2013 ND 246
Highlight: A clerical error correctable under N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 includes a failure to accurately record action taken by the court, but the rule does not extend to correction of errors of substance. |
Krueger v. Krueger (Cross-reference w/20070196)
2013 ND 245 Highlight: A party seeking a contempt sanction must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed. An inability to comply with an order is a defense to contempt proceedings, but the alleged contemnor has the burden to prove the defense. |
Stensland v. Disciplinary Board
2013 ND 244
Highlight: A suspended lawyer has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence the requisite honesty and integrity to be reinstated to the practice of law. |
Rath v. Rath (cross reference w/20130327 & 20130025)
2013 ND 243
Highlight: Technical violations of a court order do not necessarily require a finding of contempt. |
State, et al. v. B.B., et al. (confidential)
2013 ND 242
Highlight: A paternity and support claim can be bifurcated from a related custody action. |
Dahm v. Stark County Board of County Commissioners
2013 ND 241
Highlight: The decision of a board of county commissioners on whether to approve an application for a zoning change and plat approval will be affirmed unless the board acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, or if there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision. |
Bahtiraj v. State
2013 ND 240 Highlight: Without more, the second Strickland prong is not satisfied by a self-serving statement that the petitioner would have insisted on going to trial. Factors to consider when determining the rationality of rejecting a guilty plea and insisting on going to trial include immigration consequences, strength of the case against the petitioner, and rational defenses to the charged crime. |
State v. Otto
2013 ND 239 Highlight: The automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to a readily mobile camper that is not in a place regularly used for residential purposes. |
Kinsella v. State
2013 ND 238 Highlight: Failure to move pretrial to suppress evidence, by itself, does not equate to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, but where counsel has no reason to question the search and seizure, failure to file a motion to suppress does not render the representation ineffective. |
Morton County Social Service Board, et al. v. Houim
2013 ND 237
Highlight: When a party moves to modify primary residential responsibility of a child, the district court must consider only the party's motion on briefs, affidavits, and other supporting documents to determine whether the moving party established a prima facie case and is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. |
State v. Canfield
2013 ND 236 Highlight: An inadequate record may make appellate review of the district court's denial of a suppression motion impossible, thus requiring reversal and remand for further proceedings. |
Parsons v. WSI
2013 ND 235
Highlight: A claimant for workers' compensation benefits must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury. |
State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile
2013 ND 234
Highlight: Due process requires that a notice of forfeiture hearing be served on any interested party. |
Matter of Muscha
2013 ND 233 Highlight: Order civilly committing appellant as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Fee (consol. 20130177)
2013 ND 232 Highlight: A district court judgment forfeiting property connected to criminal activity is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Ruddell
2013 ND 231 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered for abandonment or nonsupport of a child is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |