Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
301 - 350 of 12382 results
Morales v. Weatherford U.S., et al.
2024 ND 81
Highlight: Only those judgments and decrees which constitute a final determination of the parties' rights to an action and those orders enumerated in N.D.C.C. § 28-27-02 are appealable. |
Zander, et al. v. Morsette
2024 ND 80
Highlight: The district court controls the scope and substance of opening and closing arguments, and a district court's decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. |
State v. Pederson
2024 ND 79
Highlight: To succeed in a challenge under Brady, the defendant must demonstrate the evidence was favorable to the defendant or plainly exculpatory. |
State v. Hartson
2024 ND 78
Highlight: Changing the culpability level of the crime charged is not a modification of a statute. Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-02-02(4), a lesser degree of culpability is satisfied if the proven degree of culpability is higher. |
Musland v. Musland
2024 ND 77
Highlight: A marital distribution does not need to be equal to be equitable, and while assessing a property division, a district court may consider the importance of preserving the viability of a business operation like a family farm. Liquidation of an ongoing farming operation or business is ordinarily a last resort. |
Estate of Kish
2024 ND 76
Highlight: A two-step analysis is required to determine whether an order is appealable. First, for this Court to have appellate jurisdiction, the order being appealed must meet statutory criteria for appealability. Second, for this Court to consider the appeal at this time, the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) must have been satisfied. |
State v. Fuglesten
2024 ND 74 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a conditional plea is reversed and remanded to allow for withdrawal of the guilty plea because law enforcement illegally entered the home without exigent circumstances. If a misdemeanant is fleeing law enforcement, then exigent circumstances are required to permit law enforcement to enter the misdemeanant's home. |
Berdahl v. Berdahl
2024 ND 73 Highlight: When this Court has made a legal pronouncement and remanded a case for further proceedings, the parties may not relitigate the issue and the district court is required to follow the terms of our decision. The district court has some discretion on the procedures used on remand. However, that discretion is not without bounds and must be exercised within the scope of our decision. Adverse or erroneous rulings do not, by themselves, demonstrate bias of a district court judge. |
Schmidt v. Hess Corp., et al.
2024 ND 72
Highlight: To prove negligence, a plaintiff must establish the existence of a duty, breach of that duty, and an injury proximately caused by the breach of duty. |
Cichos, et al. v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C., et al.
2024 ND 71
Highlight: Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., preserves our long-standing policy against piecemeal appeals. When this Court considers the merits in a case involving a N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification, it does so because the resolution of the issue on appeal will always need to be resolved and is separate from the issue left to be adjudicated. |
Rennie v. State
2024 ND 69 Highlight: A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.
2024 ND 68 Highlight: We will not consider an appeal in a multi-claim lawsuit where the district court order disposes of fewer than all the claims against all the parties unless the court has determined that a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) is appropriate. |
Urrabazo v. State
2024 ND 67
Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is affirmed. |
State v. Freeman
2024 ND 66
Highlight: A motion for mistrial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion or a manifest injustice would result. Granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be resorted to when a fundamental defect or occurrence in the trial proceedings exists that makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice. |
Kemmet v. Kemmet
2024 ND 65
Highlight: A divorce judgment is reversed in part and remanded for clarification of the district court’s findings regarding equitable distribution of the marital estate and a correct accounting of the distribution. |
State v. Alameen
2024 ND 64
Highlight: When asserting a claim of obvious error, a defendant must show: (1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error affects the defendant’s substantial rights, if there is no error there is no reason to go further into the analysis. |
State v. Alameen
2024 ND 64 |
Adoption of T.J.R. and B.L.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2024 ND 63
Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. § 14-15-19 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Cote v. Cote
2024 ND 62 Highlight: If the district court determines a material change in circumstances has occurred, the court must consider whether changing primary residential responsibility is necessary to serve the child’s best interests. When a trial court does not make required findings, it errs as a matter of law, and it is necessary to remand for additional findings. |
Interest of S.S.C.
2024 ND 61 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Henke
2024 ND 60
Highlight: An invited error of a non-structural issue will not be reviewed by this Court under the Invited Error Doctrine. |
Urrabazo v. State
2024 ND 59 Highlight: A district court’s order for denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Hoever v. Wilder
2024 ND 58 Highlight: An appellant’s argument must contain the appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies, and citation to the record showing that the issue was preserved for review or a statement of grounds for seeking review of an issue not preserved. A party waives an issue by not providing supporting argument and, without supportive reasoning or citations to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit. The Court will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed, or engage in unassisted searches of the record for evidence to support a litigant’s position. |
Interest of J.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2024 ND 57 Highlight: A juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of S.B.
2024 ND 56 Highlight: A juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Nelson
2024 ND 55 Highlight: If a defendant’s crime and revocation of probation occurred after the 2021 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-07(6), a district court may resentence the defendant up to the maximum allowed at the time of his original sentence. |
State v. Thornton, et al.
2024 ND 54
Highlight: We exercise our authority to issue supervisory writs rarely and cautiously on a case-by-case basis and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists. Our authority to issue a supervisory writ is discretionary. We generally will not exercise our supervisory jurisdiction where the proper remedy is an appeal. |
Dahms v. Legacy Plumbing
2024 ND 53
Highlight: Conduct constituting a breach of contract does not create a tort for negligence, unless the defendant’s conduct also establishes a breach of an independent duty that does not arise from the contract. |
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2024 ND 52
Highlight: A title dispute does not establish a taking. The State may protect its interests in a title dispute and must do “something more” than assert title to complete a taking. |
Whitetail Wave v. XTO Energy, et al.
2024 ND 52 |
Interest of Y.R.
2024 ND 51 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Happel v. State
2024 ND 50 Highlight: A district court order denying a postconviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Happel v. State
2024 ND 50 |
Adoption of R.E.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2024 ND 49 Highlight: An order denying a petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Driver
2024 ND 48
Highlight: The scope of an opening statement rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and this Court will not reverse a conviction on the ground that the opening statement was prejudicial unless there is a clear abuse of that discretion. |
State v. Glaum
2024 ND 47
Highlight: A district court’s order denying a defendant’s withdrawal of guilty pleas is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Petro-Hunt v. Tank, et al.
2024 ND 46
Highlight: Assignments and deeds are interpreted in the same manner as contracts, with the primary purpose to ascertain and effectuate the parties’ or grantor’s intent. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, SCJD
2024 ND 45 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Washburn. |
Meuchel v. Red Trail Energy
2024 ND 44
Highlight: A district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a member’s request for certain information in a board-managed limited liability company under the applicable statute governing an LLC member’s right to information. |
Interest of A.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2024 ND 43 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is reversed. The court’s findings on termination are clearly erroneous because the findings are not supported by evidence in the record. The juvenile court abused its discretion by relying on affidavits in the file that were not received into evidence. |
State v. Henderson
2024 ND 42 Highlight: A criminal judgment is reversed because the district court abused its discretion by admitting several trial exhibits that were not properly authenticated under N.D.R.Ev. 901 and are inadmissible hearsay that lacked sufficient foundation as records of regularly conducted activity under N.D.R.Ev. 803(6). |
State v. Henderson
2024 ND 42 |
Interest of R.K.
2024 ND 41 Highlight: A district court’s order continuing an individual’s treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of R.K.
2024 ND 41 |
Papenhausen v. ConocoPhillips Co.
2024 ND 40
Highlight: We answer two certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota regarding North Dakota’s natural accumulation rule, which precludes liability for injuries caused by natural accumulations of snow and ice. The questions ask whether the accumulation rule extends to an oil well site in a rural area, and, if so, does it still apply if it conceals a condition substantially more dangerous than one normally associated with ice and snow. |
Papenhausen v. ConocoPhillips Co.
2024 ND 40 |
State v. Wiese
2024 ND 39
Highlight: Obvious error analysis does not apply to errors waived through the doctrine of invited error, unless a constitutional error is structural. |
State v. Wiese
2024 ND 39 |
Archambault v. State
2024 ND 38
Highlight: To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim under the Strickland test, the applicant must show: (1) counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
Weber v. NDDOT
2024 ND 37 Highlight: A driver arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol was provided a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel when he was permitted to use his cellphone to call a third party to help contact an attorney and made no additional requests or attempts to contact counsel. |