Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7101 - 7200 of 12418 results
State v. Johnson (CROSS-REFERENCE W/ 930214)
1997 ND 235 |
Disciplinary Board v. Fisher (Consolidated w/ 970344)
1997 ND 234 |
State v. Harmon (CONSOL. w/960207-960208; 970100-970102)
1997 ND 233 |
Otterson v. Otterson
1997 ND 232 |
Miller v. MedCenter One
1997 ND 231 |
Hanson, et al. v. Cincinnati Life Ins. Co.
1997 ND 230 |
State v. Albaugh (CONSOLIDATED w/970075)
1997 ND 229 |
State v. Magnuson
1997 ND 228 |
Larson v. Moore, Director, ND DOT
1997 ND 227 |
Gowin v. Trangsrud
1997 ND 226 |
Withey v. Hager (CROSS REFERENCE W/ 950122)
1997 ND 225 |
Krabseth v. Moore
1997 ND 224 |
Cridland v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al.
1997 ND 223 |
Baer v. Director, N.D. Dept of Transportation
1997 ND 222 |
Raboin v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau
1997 ND 221 |
Vetter v. Vetter
1997 ND 220 |
Pavlicek v. Allison
1997 ND 219 |
Gerard v. State (CONSOL. w/970136; 970137) (cross-ref. w/960264)
1997 ND 218 |
City of Fargo v. Rockwell
1997 ND 217 |
State v. Feigert
1997 ND 216 |
Disciplinary Board v. Neset
1997 ND 215 |
Whitmire v. Whitmire
1997 ND 214 |
Perry, et al. v. Reinke
1997 ND 213 |
State v. Owens (CONSOLIDATED w/970195) (cross-ref. w/970193; 960134)
1997 ND 212 |
Pederson, et al. v. Kolschefsky
1997 ND 211 |
Gibbon v. Gibbon
1997 ND 210 |
Christmann v. Christmann
1997 ND 209 |
Boehm v. Berger
1997 ND 208 |
Sposato v. Sposato
1997 ND 207 |
Austin v. State (cross-reference w/930261)
1997 ND 206 |
Nelson v. Gillette, et al.
1997 ND 205 |
City of Fargo v. Sivertson
1997 ND 204 |
Zimmerman v. Valdak Corp. (Cross-ref. w/930410)
1997 ND 203 |
Braaten v, Deere and Co., et al. (CROSS REF. W/960058)
1997 ND 202 |
Lovcik v. Ellingson
1997 ND 201 |
Falcon v. State (Cross-reference w/ 950314)
1997 ND 200 |
State v. Clark (CONSOLIDATED W/ 970109 & 970231)
1997 ND 199 |
Dietrich v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al.
1997 ND 198 |
Zimmerman v. Newton
1997 ND 197 |
Disciplinary Board v. Query
1997 ND 196 |
Dougan v. Dougan
1997 ND 195 |
Hurt, et al. v. Freeland, et al.
1997 ND 194 |
Wheeling v. Director, N.D. DOT
1997 ND 193 |
Glander v. Glander
1997 ND 192 |
Fuhrman v. ND Workers Comp.
1997 ND 191 |
City of Medora v. Golberg, et al.
1997 ND 190 |
State v. Rieger (CONSOLIDATED W/ 970064)
1997 ND 189 |
State v. Hart
1997 ND 188 |
Cermak v. Cermak (cross-ref. w/950067)
1997 ND 187 |
Kryzsko v. Kryzsko
1997 ND 186 |
Laney v. Uecker
1997 ND 185 |
State v. Leppert (CONSOLIDATED w/970041)
1997 ND 184 |
State v. Novak
1997 ND 183 |
Zimmerman v. Zimmerman
1997 ND 182 |
State v. Osier
1997 ND 170 |
Walbert v. Walbert (CONSOL. w/960387) (cross-ref. w/960280)
1997 ND 164 |
State v. Avila
1997 ND 142 |
Hamich, Inc., et al. v. State ex rel. Clayburgh
1997 ND 110 |
Zuger v. Zuger
1997 ND 97 |
Symington v. Walle Mutual Ins. Co., et al.
1997 ND 93 |
Toth v. Disciplinary Board
1997 ND 75 |
Moch v. Moch, et al. (CONSOLIDATED W/960179)
1997 ND 69 |
State v. Garcia
1997 ND 60 |
Estate of Zimmerman
1997 ND 58 |
City of Williston v. Hegstad
1997 ND 56 |
Lovin v. Lovin
1997 ND 55 |
Medcenter One v. ND State Board of Pharmacy
1997 ND 54 |
Loll v. Loll, et al.
1997 ND 51 |
Traynor, et al. v. Leclerc, et al.
1997 ND 47 |
ND Workers Compensation Bureau v. Leclerc
1997 ND 47 |
Filler et al. v. Bragg et al.
1997 ND 24 |
Bies, f/k/a Obregon v. Obregon
1997 ND 18 |
State v. Foster (Consolidated w/960176)
1997 ND 8 |
State v. Carlson
1997 ND 7 |
Anderson v. A.P.I. Company, et al.
1997 ND 6 |
Tormaschy, et al. v. Tormaschy, et al.
1997 ND 2 |
Roth, et al. v. Meyer, et al.
|
State v. Williams
1 7.N.W3 d820 |
State v. Rolland
1 1.N.W3 d761 Highlight: Whether a criminal defendant is competent to stand trial is a question of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. When a court has found a defendant facing felony charges to be unfit to proceed, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-04-08 contemplates attempted rehabilitation. |
Anderson v. Foss, et al.
1 0.N.W3 d570
Highlight: A district court did not abuse its discretion when setting the commencement date for the new child support obligation one year from the date of the motion to modify. |
McKenzie Electric Coop., Inc. v. El-Dweek, et al.
1 5.N.W3 d12 |
Disciplinary Board v. Spencer
003 N.W.3d 122 |
Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al.
1 4.N.W3 d45
Highlight: Summary judgment should not constitute mini-trials of factual issues and is not appropriate when the court must draw inferences or make findings on disputed facts. |
Morales v. Weatherford U.S., et al.
6.N.W3 d657 Highlight: Recovery under a theory of negligence requires a plaintiff to show the defendant owed a duty of care. Whether a duty exists is a legal question to be decided on the facts. Under premises liability law, landowners owe a general duty to lawful entrants to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition in view of all the circumstances. A landowner's duty to protect entrants upon the land or warn of dangerous conditions is limited when the dangerous condition is known or obvious to the entrant. Roadways present an open and obvious danger to pedestrians of being struck by vehicular traffic. A landowner may have a duty to protect against open and obvious dangers when there is reason to expect that an entrant's attention may be distracted. The distraction exception is not available when the plaintiff is the source of inattention. |
Interest of H.J.J.N.
9.N.W3 d656 Highlight: An amended judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Brown v. State
6.N.W3 d823
Highlight: The definition of official detention does not preclude custody while on probation. |
Peltier v. State (consolidated w/20230392)
Highlight: A district court's order on petitions is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2). |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, ECJD
Highlight: Vacancy retained at Fargo |
Interest of J.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/ 20230378)
002 N.W.3d 228 Highlight: A juvenile court errs when it relies on facts which are outside of the evidentiary record when exercising its discretion to terminate parental rights. |
Dimmler v. Dimmler, et al.
Highlight: Complete valuation of a remainder interest includes consideration of the debt secured by a mortgage on the real estate. |
Albertson v. Albertson
996 N.W.2d 662
Highlight: A district court must specially state facts when granting a disorderly conduct restraining order, which allow a reviewing court to understand the basis of the decision. |
State v. Brame
993 N.W.2d 338
Highlight: District courts must substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11 to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily enters a guilty plea. |
Legacie-Lowe v. Lowe
990 N.W.2d 592 |
Goetz v. Goetz, et al.
988 N.W.2d 553 |
Martinez v. State
|
Queen v. Martel, et al.
980 N.W.2d 914 |
Norberg v. Norberg, et al.
977 N.W.2d 711 |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
975 N.W.2d 567 |
Matter of Rose Henderson Peterson Mineral Trust
974 N.W.2d 372 |
Disciplinary Board v. Baird (consolidated w/ 20210329-20210330)
|