Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7261 - 7270 of 12446 results
|
State v. Williams
873 N.W.2d 13 Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a request for a transcript, and the court abuses its discretion by refusing the request if a particularized need, necessity, or justification for its preparation and use is shown. |
|
Interest of J.A.H. (Consolidated w/20140146)
855 N.W.2d 394 Highlight: When a juvenile court provides insufficient findings to review, jurisdiction may be retained under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and the case remanded with instructions that the juvenile court make expedited findings of fact. |
|
Nemec v. Disciplinary Board
799 N.W.2d 370 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |
|
State v. Juntunen
845 N.W.2d 325 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
842 N.W.2d 646 Highlight: Interim suspension vacated. |
|
Phillips v. State
841 N.W.2d 731
Highlight: A separate appeal from an order denying the transcript of a post-conviction relief hearing is unnecessary when an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief is already pending. |
|
Judicial Redistricting (consol. w/ 20130221)
833 N.W.2d 543 Highlight: Counties moved from South Central to Southeast Judicial District and Northwest Judicial District divided into two districts, effective January 1, 2014. |
|
Interest of S.R.B. (Confidential)
830 N.W.2d 565
Highlight: In an expedited appeal taken from an order for hospitalization and treatment, a trial court must make findings of fact specially under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) as to whether the respondent is a person requiring treatment and hospitalization is the least restrictive treatment. |
|
Palmer v. State (consol.w/20110346-20110348)(cross-ref.w/20010123-20010126)
816 N.W.2d 807 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of its rationale for its decision. |
|
State v. Gress
803 N.W.2d 607 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |