Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7251 - 7260 of 12446 results
|
Wojahn v. Levi
861 N.W.2d 173 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Beylund v. Levi
859 N.W.2d 403 Highlight: The implied consent laws do not violate the Fourth Amendment, under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. |
|
State v. Timm
881 N.W.2d 256 Highlight: DUI conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Mann
876 N.W.2d 710
Highlight: North Dakota's criminal refusal statute is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment and North Dakota Constitution article I, section 8. |
|
State v. Kordonowy
867 N.W.2d 690
Highlight: The implied consent statute criminalizing refusal to consent to chemical testing is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Constitution article I, section 8, and it is not unconstitutionally vague. |
|
State v. Baxter
863 N.W.2d 208 |
|
State v. Harns
861 N.W.2d 173 Highlight: Driving under the influence conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Washburn
861 N.W.2d 173 Highlight: An order dismissing a criminal prosecution for refusing to submit to a chemical test for intoxication is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
|
State v. Beylund
861 N.W.2d 172 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
State v. Birchfield
858 N.W.2d 302 Highlight: The implied consent statute criminalizing refusal to consent to a chemical test is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or North Dakota Constitution. art. I, sec. 8. |