Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4701 - 4750 of 12358 results
Red River Wings, Inc. v. Hoot, Inc. (Consolidated w/20070088 & 20070089)
2008 ND 117
Highlight: Unambiguous contracts are particularly amenable to summary judgment. |
Baukol Builders v. County of Grand Forks
2008 ND 116
Highlight: A party cannot seek the benefits of a transaction under the law and thereafter challenge the validity of the transaction. |
Peterson v. Ziegler
2008 ND 115
Highlight: Generally, the time computation rules in N.D.R.Civ.P. 6 apply to an appeal from an administrative agency decision unless the provisions of the rule conflict with a governing statute. |
Burlington Northern v. Fail, et al.
2008 ND 114
Highlight: The area of land covered by the easement, servitude, or nonappurtenant restriction on the use of real property shall be properly described and shall set out the area of land covered by the interest in real property. |
Olson v. State
2008 ND 113
Highlight: A petitioner seeking post-conviction relief through DNA testing of evidence must present a prima facie case showing the evidence to be tested has been subject to a sufficient chain of custody. |
Overboe v. Brodshaug
2008 ND 112
Highlight: A motion to vacate a default judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. |
Lawrence v. Delkamp
2008 ND 111
Highlight: Rule 43(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., permits, and does not mandate, courts to allow presentation of testimony by contemporaneous transmission. |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20070164 & 20070165)
2008 ND 109
Highlight: An applicant for post-conviction relief has the burden of establishing grounds for relief. |
State v. Curtis (cross ref. 20070249 & 20070333)
2008 ND 108
Highlight: A criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process is not absolute, and does not guarantee the right to secure the attendance and testimony of any and all witnesses. |
B.L.L., et al. v. W.D.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2008 ND 107
Highlight: Whether a child has been abandoned is a question of fact. |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of V.J.V.N.
2008 ND 106
Highlight: The district court has discretionary authority regarding the management of a protected person's estate, and the court's decisions on those matters will be reversed on appeal only for an abuse of discretion. |
Richter v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 105 Highlight: Evidence that is excludable on constitutional grounds may be excluded by an administrative agency upon proper objection. |
Alerus Financial, N.A., et al. v. Western State Bank, et al.
2008 ND 104
Highlight: In construing a trust agreement, the court's primary objective is to ascertain the settlor's intent. |
State v. Hernandez
2008 ND 103 Highlight: A district court order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Suelzle v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 102 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Riemers v. State of North Dakota, et al.
2008 ND 101
Highlight: When the Supreme Court denies a petition to review a Court of Appeals decision, the decision becomes final and will not be differently determined on a subsequent appeal in the same case. |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of D.M.O. (cross-reference 20040235)
2008 ND 100
Highlight: The Supreme Court will dismiss an appeal when issues become moot or academic and there is no actual controversy left for our determination. |
Larson v. Hagerty, et al.
2008 ND 99 Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a complaint which alleged that state officials had deprived the appellant access to the courts is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Reopelle v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2008 ND 98
Highlight: Unless otherwise provided, statutes in effect on the date of an injury govern a claimant's right to collect workers compensation benefits. |
Waldie v. Waldie
2008 ND 97
Highlight: A district court's decision regarding redistribution of marital property and debt is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard. |
State v. $33,000 U.S. Currency, et al.
2008 ND 96
Highlight: A district court's denial of a motion for relief from a default judgment will be reversed if the court abused its discretion. |
Riemers v. Mahar
2008 ND 95
Highlight: A public figure is prohibited from recovering damages for defamatory criticism unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the statements were made with actual malice. |
State v. Schwab (Consolidated w/20070277)
2008 ND 94 Highlight: Once a blood alcohol test report is admitted into evidence, a court abuses its discretion by refusing to permit a DUI defendant to examine the analyst who performed the chemical testing, if the analyst is present at court. |
State v. Curtis (cross ref. 20070250 & 20070333)
2008 ND 93
Highlight: A criminal conviction will be reversed for insufficient evidence only when, after viewing the evidence and all reasonable evidentiary inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict, no rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Walberg v. Walberg, et al.
2008 ND 92
Highlight: Statutes are construed to harmonize them and avoid an unreasonable result or unjust consequence. |
Voisine v. State
2008 ND 91
Highlight: Conditions of probation are strictly construed in favor of the offender; however, the conditions are construed as mandatory because of the duty to regulate a probationer's activities to help in his or her rehabilitation and at the same time to guard against continued criminal behavior. |
Krueger v. Krueger
2008 ND 90
Highlight: A spousal support award must consider a disadvantaged spouse's needs and a supporting spouse's ability to pay. |
Interest of I.B.A. and C.B.A. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20070334)
2008 ND 89
Highlight: While there is no constitutional right to appear at the hearing, a parent must be represented by counsel at a hearing to terminate parental rights, absent a valid waiver of counsel. |
Teigen, et al. v. State
2008 ND 88
Highlight: A court can decide constitutional issues if at least one plaintiff has standing. |
Hoover v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 87
Highlight: Eyewitness testimony is not necessary to establish reasonable grounds to believe a person was driving under the influence; circumstantial evidence is sufficient. |
Interest of T.E. (Confidential)
2008 ND 86 Highlight: A district court must to make all four factual findings in an involuntary medication order, whether the involuntary medication order is included as part of the larger commitment order or when a medication order is issued separately. |
Ike v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 85
Highlight: The issuance of a temporary operator's permit to a driver having an alcohol concentration exceeding the per se limit is a basic and mandatory requirement under N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1. The issuance of the permit serves as the Department's official notification to the driver of the Department's intent to revoke, suspend, or deny driving privileges. |
State v. Gay
2008 ND 84
Highlight: Under the Fourth Amendment, a seizure occurs whenever an officer stops an individual and restrains his freedom, and that seizure must be reasonable. |
State v. Vaagen
2008 ND 83 Highlight: A criminal conviction of failure to pay child support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Feist
2008 ND 82 Highlight: A criminal judgment for fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4). |
Interest of C.J., S.J., and K.W. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20070315)
2008 ND 81 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3). |
Ward, et al. v. Bullis, et al.
2008 ND 80
Highlight: An attorney may be liable for securities law violations if he is an agent who effects or attempts to effect the purchase or sale of securities, and he aids or participates in any way in the sale or contract for sale made in violation of the Securities Act. |
Manske v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
2008 ND 79
Highlight: A worker's employment need not be the sole cause of injury to be compensable. It is sufficient if a work condition is a substantial contributing factor to the disease. |
Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2008 ND 78 Highlight: Section 65-01-09, N.D.C.C., does not grant WSI a subrogation interest in an injured worker's legal malpractice claim against an attorney who committed malpractice in handling the injured worker's claim against a third-party tortfeasor. |
Sandvick, et al. v. LaCrosse, et al.
2008 ND 77
Highlight: The crucial elements of a partnership are (1) an intention to be partners, (2) co-ownership of the business, and (3) a profit motive. |
Disciplinary Board v. O'Donnell (Consolidated w/ 20080085)
2008 ND 76 Highlight: Lawyer is suspended from the practice of law for two years, but the suspension is stayed for two years on conditions. Interim suspension is vacated. |
Grosgebauer v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 75
Highlight: Whether a driver affirmatively refused to submit to alcohol testing is a determination of fact that is significantly reliant on the credibility of witnesses. |
Stockman Bank of Montana v. AGSCO, Inc., et al.(Cross Ref w/20060174)
2008 ND 74 Highlight: Where a party is erroneously ordered to pay another, the party is entitled to interest at the legal rate set by N.D.C.C. 47-14-05, when the judgment is later reversed. |
State v. Jacobson
2008 ND 73
Highlight: An appearance of partiality requiring a judge's disqualification does not automatically result from a judge's casual or social acquaintance with a witness. |
Bateman v. City of Grand Forks
2008 ND 72
Highlight: A court's review of special assessments for local improvements is limited to assuring that local taxing authorities do not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably. |
Lynnes v. Lynnes
2008 ND 71
Highlight: The district court's valuation of property is a finding of fact which will be reversed on appeal only if it is clearly erroneous. When the district court's valuation is within the range of evidence provided by the parties, the district court's valuation will not be set aside, unless this Court has a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. |
State v. Gendron
2008 ND 70
Highlight: Restitution orders will be affirmed unless the district court acted outside the limits set by statute, which is similar to an abuse of discretion standard. |
State v. Loomer (Consolidated w/20070236-20070239)
2008 ND 69
Highlight: For a not guilty plea, the Rules of Criminal Procedure do not require specific notice of a mandatory minimum sentence. |
Wenzel Estate v. Wenzel
2008 ND 68
Highlight: A trial court's findings in a partition action will not be reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous. |
Oyloe v. ND Department of Human Services
2008 ND 67
Highlight: A Medicaid-qualifying trust is considered an available asset for Medicaid eligibility purposes. |