Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4801 - 4850 of 12382 results
Langer, et al. v. Bartholomay, et al.
2008 ND 40
Highlight: Custom and usage may be given effect as part of a written contract if the agreement is silent or ambiguous on a point and there is a well-established custom concerning a subject so that the parties may be presumed to have acted with reference to the custom. |
Interest of R.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2008 ND 39
Highlight: Juveniles have a statutory right to a reasonable opportunity to consult with a parent, guardian, custodian, or legal counsel before submitting to chemical testing when providing the opportunity to consult does not materially interfere with administration of the chemical test. |
City of Minot v. Keller (Consolidated w/20070117)
2008 ND 38 Highlight: For reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle, officer to officer communications are presumptively reliable. |
Interest of P.F. (Confidential)
2008 ND 37
Highlight: The court must decide whether an individual who is committed because he is sexually dangerous may be discharged. |
Matter of Hehn
2008 ND 36
Highlight: In a civil commitment of a sexually dangerous individual, the fact that actuarial test scores do not give rise to scores showing a high re-offending risk does not preclude the fact-finder from coming to an alternative conclusion. |
State of Michigan, ex. rel. Schneider v. Schneider, et al.
2008 ND 35
Highlight: Any deviation from the child support guidelines requires the court to make a written finding or a specific finding on the record. |
People to Save the Sheyenne River, et al. v. Dept. of Health, et al.
2008 ND 34
Highlight: The Health Department's decision to modify a North Dakota Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit will not be reversed on appeal unless the decision is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. |
State v. Lium
2008 ND 33
Highlight: A plea agreement for a specific sentence or sentencing range which is binding on a district court may be accepted, rejected, or deferred until the court has reviewed a presentence report. |
State v. Fischer (Cross-Ref. w/20050437 & 20060153)
2008 ND 32
Highlight: Consent to search may be given by parties with actual or apparent authority, when viewed from the officer's perspective. |
State v. Skarsgard
2008 ND 31
Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b), a defendant is required to make certain motions before trial, and failure to do so may waive defenses under the rule. |
Lies v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 30
Highlight: Individuals arrested for DUI must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test. |
Patten v. State
2008 ND 29
Highlight: A lawyer must abide by a competent defendant's decision regarding the plea to be entered. |
State v. Kochel
2008 ND 28 Highlight: Whether an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy is reviewed de novo. |
State v. Schmalz (CONSOLIDATED w/20070128)
2008 ND 27
Highlight: Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances relied upon by the judge who issues the warrant would lead a person of reasonable caution to believe the contraband or evidence sought probably will be found in the place to be searched. |
Frueh v. Frueh
2008 ND 26
Highlight: In considering whether the moving party has established a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing on a motion to change custody, a district court may not weigh conflicting issues of fact raised in the parties' affidavits. |
Matter of Barrera
2008 ND 25
Highlight: Involuntary civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person is reviewed under a modified clearly erroneous standard of review. |
Bertram v. State
2008 ND 24 Highlight: Denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7). |
Hammer v. Director, ND Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 23 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Sandoval v. Department of Transportation
2008 ND 22 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges for three years is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
State v. Larson
2008 ND 21 Highlight: A district court order dismissing a DUI criminal complaint is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Gress
2008 ND 20 Highlight: Conviction of attempt to steal a vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2008 ND 19 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
State v. Brandt
2008 ND 18 Highlight: Convictions for aggravated assault, knowing or reckless interference with a telephone during an emergency call and felonious restraint are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a) (3), (4) and (7). |
Disciplinary Board v. O'Donnell (cross ref. 20070340)
2008 ND 17 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer orderd. |
State v. Carlsen
2008 ND 16 Highlight: Conviction of reckless endangerment under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
Judicial Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, East Central Judicial District
2008 ND 15 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Fargo in the East Central Judicial District. |
Wold v. Wold
2008 ND 14
Highlight: Generally, in a divorce, a court's property valuations are not clearly erroneous if they are within the range of the evidence presented. |
State v. Desjarlais (Consolidated w/20070157)
2008 ND 13 Highlight: There is no obvious error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b) unless there is a clear deviation from a clearly established rule of law. |
Van Sickle, et al. v. Hallmark & Assoc., Inc., et al.
2008 ND 12
Highlight: A debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy unless the creditor received notice of the bankruptcy proceedings. |
Koble v. Koble
2008 ND 11 |
Leno v. Department of Transportation
2008 ND 10
Highlight: The Department is not required to show an Intoxilyzer machine has been recalibrated following a movement of the machine to prove an Intoxilyzer test was fairly administered. |
Interest of J.S., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2008 ND 9 |
Kourajian v. Kourajian
2008 ND 8
Highlight: A party seeking custody modification under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.6(4) is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if the party brings a prima facie case, by alleging, with supporting affidavits, sufficient facts which, if uncontradicted, would support a custody modification in favor of that party. |
City of Minot v. Boger, et al. (Cross-reference w/ 20060163)
2008 ND 7
Highlight: The due process clauses of the federal and state constitutions are not violated under the void-for-vagueness doctrine if the challenged language, when measured by common understanding and practice, gives adequate warning of the conduct proscribed and marks boundaries sufficiently distinct for fair administration of the law. |
Overland v. Overland
2008 ND 6
Highlight: A district court's division of property does not need to be equal to be equitable, but any substantial disparity must be explained. |
City of Grand Forks v. Mitchell
2008 ND 5
Highlight: A police officer's stop of a vehicle bearing no license plates with a white 8 ? x 11 sheet of paper with a date written in black marker posted in its rear window that the officer did not recognize as an authentic temporary registration certificate was constitutionally permissible because the officer had reasonable and articulable suspicion of a violation of the motor vehicle registration law. |
State v. Wegley
2008 ND 4
Highlight: Even if a defendant objects to hearsay testimony about a child's out-of-court statement at a pre-trial hearing, the defendant's failure to object at trial limits review to determining whether the admission of that testimony into evidence constitutes obvious error affecting substantial rights. |
State v. Emery
2008 ND 3
Highlight: Ordering the surrender of license plates does not fit the maximum penalty for a first DUI offense. |
State v. Odom (Cross-Ref w/20060106)
2008 ND 2 Highlight: A district court drug-offenses criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. St. Claire
2008 ND 1 Highlight: Judgment in a drug case following denial of motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3). |
Brewer v. Ziegler
2007 ND 207
Highlight: A highway patrol officer has the express power to enforce the state motor vehicle laws and to enforce all laws relating to the use or presence of alcoholic beverages in motor vehicles, and, therefore, has the power to arrest a person who is located on private property while violating the provisions of those laws. |
Manitoba Public Ins. Corp. v. Dakota Fire Ins. Co.
2007 ND 206 Highlight: A procedural remedy is not a vested right and is subject to repeal, modification, or change. |
Hsu v. Marian Manor Apartments
2007 ND 205
Highlight: A contract providing for the lease of a clinic owned by a nursing home to a licensed physician, which named the physician lessee using the suffix "M.D.," and which provided that the lessee shall obtain and maintain all necessary licenses to operate a clinic, unambiguously required the physician to maintain a license to practice medicine. |
Disciplinary Board v. Nemec
2007 ND 204 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Johnson (Consolidated w/ 20070108)
2007 ND 203
Highlight: A lawyer may be disciplined for writing a letter to a third party containing false statements that have no substantial purpose other than to delay or to embarrass or burden the third party. |
Nagel v. Workforce Safety and Ins., et al.
2007 ND 202
Highlight: Equitable estoppel may be applied to bar an assertion that a claim was untimely under N.D.C.C. 65-05-01. |
Bartch v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2007 ND 201 Highlight: Display of an expired registration tab on a license plate justifies a traffic stop. |
Bowman v. ND Workforce Safety and Insurance
2007 ND 200 Highlight: A judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance denying an application for workers compensation benefits is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Christofferson v. N.D. Dept. of Health
2007 ND 199 Highlight: A tire collection that may benefit agricultural activities may not be a "beneficial use" because of "accumulations in total, on human and animal health, the environment, and on local and state government, which may be ultimately financially responsible to dispose of the tires." |
Matter of Midgett
2007 ND 198
Highlight: The Sixth Amendment does not apply to a civil commitment proceeding for a sexually dangerous individual. |