Opinions

State v. Schmeets 2007 ND 197
Docket No.: 20060375
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The threshold question for determining whether a person tampered with constitutes a "witness" is whether the individual charged with tampering with that person had a reasonably founded belief that the person tampered with would testify.
The person tampered with in a witness tampering case need not be included on a witness list filed in a case in order for an individual to be convicted of tampering with that witness.

Christian v. Christian 2007 ND 196
Docket No.: 20070053
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Permanent spousal support is appropriate when the economically disadvantaged spouse cannot be equitably rehabilitated to make up for the opportunities and development she lost during the course of the marriage.
When the parties to a divorce have reached an agreement on all matters pertaining to division of their property, there is no reason for the district court to hear evidence of the value of marital property.
In deciding whether to award attorney fees in a divorce action, the district court must balance one party's needs against the other party's ability to pay.
Submission of an affidavit to support an award of attorney fees is not necessary when the award is supported by testimony and other documentary evidence received in an evidentiary hearing.
Evidence that is discoverable before trial does not qualify as newly discovered evidence.
A property settlement agreement that is unconscionable may be set aside.

State v. Haugen 2007 ND 195
Docket No.: 20070141
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle is a strict liability offense, punishable without regard to intent, knowledge, willfulness, or negligence.
An appellant assumes the consequences and risks for failure to file a complete transcript, and an issue will not be reviewed if the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of the alleged error.

Evenson v. Evenson 2007 ND 194
Docket No.: 20060148
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Marital property valuations within the range of evidence presented to the district court are not clearly erroneous.
In deciding whether to award attorney fees in a divorce proceeding, the district court should consider the property owned by each party, their relative incomes, whether property is liquid or fixed assets, and whether the actions of either party have increased the time spent on the case.
Evidence must have been in existence at the time of trial to constitute newly discovered evidence.
A new trial normally will not be granted to enable the movant to present her case under a different theory than she adopted at trial.

State v. Sabo 2007 ND 193
Docket No.: 20070090
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving the prosecution the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The government's closing rebuttal argument is limited to addressing only the issues the defendant raised in his closing argument.

State v. Hurt 2007 ND 192
Docket No.: 20070081
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: In a review of a district court's decision to grant or deny a motion to suppress, the district court's findings of fact are given deference, and conflicts in testimony are resolved in favor of affirmance.
One exception to the warrant requirement is voluntary consent by the individual whose property is searched, or by a third party who possesses common authority over the premises.
The Fourth Amendment does not require law enforcement to provide co-occupants opportunity to assert their Fourth Amendment rights at the door; rather, the protections provide that a physically present co-occupant, who expressly refuses to permit the search despite the consent of his fellow occupant, renders the warrantless search unreasonable as to him.
The co-occupant who is not present at the door and does not refuse the search at the time his fellow occupant provides consent "loses out" on his opportunity to exclude evidence gathered in a common-area, co-occupant consent search.

Witzke v. Gonzales 2007 ND 191
Docket No.: 20070162
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author:

Highlight: Summary judgment for claims of private nuisance and defamation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

State v. Matuska 2007 ND 190
Docket No.: 20070124
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a request to withdraw a guilty plea may be summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

City of Jamestown v. Baker 2007 ND 189
Docket No.: 20070220
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author:

Highlight: A criminal judgment for theft is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. $3719 U.S. Currency 2007 ND 188
Docket No.: 20070149
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order granting forfeiture of $3,719 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Gandesbery 2007 ND 187
Docket No.: 20070197
Filing Date: 12/13/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Interest of B.D.K. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2007 ND 186
Docket No.: 20070320
Filing Date: 12/5/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A court is not required to order a less restrictive treatment than hospitalization when a mentally ill person requiring treatment under N.D.C.C. 25-03.1-07 makes the bare assertion that he will hire his own psychiatrist, because such assertion does not constitute a viable alternative to hospitalization.

Sundby v. Disciplinary Board 2007 ND 185
Docket No.: 20070332
Filing Date: 12/3/2007
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author:

Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered.

Estate of Egeland (Cross-ref. w/ 20060319) 2007 ND 184
Docket No.: 20070075
Filing Date: 11/27/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A court appropriately considers the benefit received by joint obligors in determining the right to contribution between them under N.D.C.C. 9-01-08.
On appeal due regard is givien to the trial court's opportunity to assess the credibility of the witnesses, and the trial court's choice between two permissible views of the evidence is not clearly erroneous.

Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky, et al. 2007 ND 183
Docket No.: 20070021
Filing Date: 11/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying "motion to expunge" under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(iii) and (iv) summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4).

Estate of Truax 2007 ND 182
Docket No.: 20070121
Filing Date: 11/19/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment denying a motion to amend a judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Hendricks Prop. Mgmt. Corp. v. Birchwood Prop. Ltd. Partnership, et al. 2007 ND 181
Docket No.: 20070028
Filing Date: 11/19/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The interpretation of an agency agreement is governed by laws for construing contracts except to the extent the agent's fiduciary relationship with the principal requires a special rule, or the parties agree otherwise.
A district court's findings of fact and conclusions of law must be stated with sufficient specificity to provide reviewing courts with a clear understanding of the district court's decision, and a district court's findings of fact are adequate if the reviewing court is able to understand the factual basis for the district court's decision.
A liquidated damage clause is valid if the damages stemming from a breach are impractical or extremely difficult to estimate when the contract was entered, the parties reasonably endeavored to fix their damages, and the amount stipulated bears a reasonable relation to the probable damages and is not disproportionate to any damages reasonably anticipated.
Face-to-face negotiations are not necessary to uphold a liquidated damage clause.

Intercept Corp. v. Calima Financial LLC, et al. 2007 ND 180
Docket No.: 20060307
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The corporate veil of a limited liability company may be pierced if the same conditions and circumstances under which the corporate veil of a corporation may be pierced under North Dakota law are present.
A lack-of-personal-jurisdiction defense is waived if it is neither made by motion nor included in a responsive pleading.

Axtmann, et al. v. Chillemi, et al. 2007 ND 179
Docket No.: 20070006
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Corporations
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The officers and directors of a corporation generally are not liable for the ordinary debts of the corporation, but a corporation's corporate veil may be disregarded when the corporation has insufficient capitalization for purposes of the corporate undertaking.
A district court's decision to pierce a corporate veil and impose personal liability on an officer or director is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.

State v. McAvoy 2007 ND 178
Docket No.: 20070095
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Conditions of probation are interpreted as mandatory.
When a violation of probation is contested, the State needs to prove a probation violation by a preponderance of the evidence.

Hawes v. ND Department of Transportation (consolidated w/20070060) 2007 ND 177
Docket No.: 20070059
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: That the defendant's vehicle is out of gas does not render the vehicle inoperable as a matter of law.
When there has been no objection to a prosecutor's argument, the judgment will not be reversed unless it was an obvious error affecting a defendant's substantial rights.

State v. Jacobs 2007 ND 176
Docket No.: 20070033
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Amended criminal judgment for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Mountrail Bethel Home v. Lovdahl (Cross-reference w/ 20060002) 2007 ND 175
Docket No.: 20070148
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment finding enforceable contract did not exist is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Skarsgard (Consolidated w/20070084) 2007 ND 174
Docket No.: 20070083
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgments for driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7).

State v. Thompson (Consolidated w/20070143) 2007 ND 173
Docket No.: 20070142
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Oie v. State 2007 ND 172
Docket No.: 20070119
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. $2996.00 U.S. Currency 2007 ND 171
Docket No.: 20070082
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order granting forfeiture of $2996.00 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Disciplinary Board v. Light 2007 ND 170
Docket No.: 20070327
Filing Date: 11/14/2007
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author:

Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered.

Rodenbiker v. Workforce Safety and Insurance 2007 ND 169
Docket No.: 20070114
Filing Date: 10/29/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Section 65-05-10, N.D.C.C., does not provide for an award of partial disability benefits when an injured worker cannot be returned to substantial gainful employment as defined under N.D.C.C. 65-05.1-01(3), and does not have a retained earnings capacity to meet the income test of N.D.C.C. 65-05.1-01(6)(a)(3).
The purpose of partial disability benefits is to assist individuals who can be returned to substantial gainful employment through rehabilitation, but will experience a decrease in earnings capacity upon return to the workforce.
Partial disability benefits are for individuals who can return to substantial gainful employment, but at a lesser amount of income.

Bertsch v. Bertsch 2007 ND 168
Docket No.: 20070110
Filing Date: 10/19/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The law of the case doctrine applies only to issues decided by final judgments.
A district court has broad discretion regarding the scope of discovery.
A district court discovery order must be obeyed by the party to whom the order was issued. Failure to obey the order will result in a sanction, requiring the failing party to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified.

Kienzle v. Yantzer 2007 ND 167
Docket No.: 20060364
Filing Date: 10/19/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: When a stipulation is incorporated into a judgment, the judgment is interpreted and enforced, not the underlying contract.
A district court's interpretation of its own judgment is entitled to deference when the language of the judgment is ambiguous.
A district court's decision whether to allow a custodial parent to relocate out of state with the child is a finding of fact, and will not be overturned on appeal unless clearly erroneous.

Interest of T. E. (Confidential) 2007 ND 166
Docket No.: 20070278
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A State Hospital patient can be subject to more than one 90-day forced medication order.
The refusal-of-medication requirement of N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(1)(a)(2) can be met when a patient who is not literally refusing medication but is taking medication only because of a prior forced medication order indicates he would not take further medication unless ordered to do so by a court.

Sayler v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2007 ND 165
Docket No.: 20070101
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: When an administrative order revoking a driver's license is appealed to the district court, the director or the hearing officer who rendered the decision must file a certified transcript of the testimony and all other proceedings within twenty days after receipt of the notice of appeal.
Probable cause to arrest a driver for driving under the influence exists if the police officer (1) observes some signs of physical or mental impairment, and (2) has reason to believe the driver's impairment is caused by alcohol.

State v. Barendt 2007 ND 164
Docket No.: 20060370
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A fact-finder decides the credibility of witnesses, and is not required to believe a witness's testimony, even when no direct evidence is offered to the contrary.

Ritter, Laber & Assoc., et al. v. Koch Oil, et al. (Cross w/20000224 & 20030347) 2007 ND 163
Docket No.: 20070029
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A party seeking reformation of a written agreement must prove by clear and convincing evidence the document does not fully or truly state the agreement the parties intended to make.
The party seeking reformation of an agreement on the basis of mutual mistake must show that, when the agreement was executed, both parties intended to say something different from what was said in the document.
In a class action lawsuit, the district court may award payment to the class representatives. Factors in making the decision include the risk to class representatives in bringing suit, the time and effort spent by the class representatives, the duration of the litigation, the time and effort expended by the representatives in pursuing the litigation, and the degree to which the class has benefitted from the representatives' actions.
The districtr court must consider the factors listed under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23(p)(5) in awarding attorney fees in a class action lawsuit.
The district court is considered an expert in determining an award of attorney fees, and its decision will not be overturned on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion.
In awarding attorney fees in a class action lawsuit, the court may consider not only the available settlement fund but also the amount of actual claims on the fund.

State v. Fasteen 2007 ND 162
Docket No.: 20070046
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Under the Terry doctrine, a law enforcement officer can make an investigative stop of a vehicle if the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the motorist has violated or is violating the law.
Under N.D.C.C. 39-10-38(1), no person may turn a vehicle right or left upon a roadway without giving an appropriate signal and unless or until such movement can be made with reasonable safety.

State v. Hemmes (consolidated w/20070011) 2007 ND 161
Docket No.: 20070010
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) does not apply to probation revocation proceedings.
The evidentiary disclosure requirements of N.D.R.Crim.P. 16 apply to probation revocation proceedings.

State v. Skarsgard (Consolidated w/ 20060305) 2007 ND 160
Docket No.: 20060304
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A law enforcement officer may make an investigative stop of a vehicle if the officer has at least a reasonable suspicion that the motorist has violated the law or probable cause to believe the motorist has done so.
When a law enforcement officer observes a vehicle with no license plates and no viewable registration certificate, the officer has reasonable grounds to stop the driver and check if the driver has a valid certificate in his possession.
An adequate foundation for admission of blood-alcohol test results may be established by the testimony of witnesses.
A jury is generally presumed to follow instructions, and a curative instruction to disregard certain evidence is generally sufficient to remove improper prejudice.
Generally, pretrial bail issues are moot after conviction.
Reversal of a conviction and release from confinement is not a remedy for allegations of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.
Appellate review of a criminal sentence focuses only on whether the district court acted within the limits prescribed by statute, or substantially relied on an impermissible factor.

State v. Skarsgard 2007 ND 159
Docket No.: 20070034
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The criminal code definition of "offense" as "conduct for which a term of imprisonment or fine is authorized under statute after conviction" applies to driving violations under N.D.C.C. 39-08-01 and 39-06-42.
Judgments for driving under the influence and driving under suspension which are on appeal are "offenses" that can be used to enhance subsequent driving under the influence and driving under suspension judgments.

State v. Overby 2007 ND 158
Docket No.: 20070054
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Findings of parole violations, revocation of parole and re-sentencing to an additional year of incarceration are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Gruett 2007 ND 157
Docket No.: 20070039
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Moilwa 2007 ND 156
Docket No.: 20070058
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court criminal judgment for criminal trespass is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Knight 2007 ND 155
Docket No.: 20070047
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

State v. Johnson 2007 ND 154
Docket No.: 20060315
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal conviction for failure to register as a sex offender is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Tassler 2007 ND 153
Docket No.: 20070078
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: Revocation of probation and sentence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Jager 2007 ND 152
Docket No.: 20070080
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Kram v. N.D. Department of Transportation 2007 ND 151
Docket No.: 20070102
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order suspending commercial driving privileges for one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Grzeskowiak (Consolidated w/20060355) 2007 ND 150
Docket No.: 20060354
Filing Date: 10/16/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author:

Highlight: Orders deferring imposition of sentence for unlawful display of license plates and failure to transfer title of a vehicle are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4).

Swenson v. Workforce Safety and Insurance Fund, et al. 2007 ND 149
Docket No.: 20070049
Filing Date: 9/5/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A claimant must prove by objective medical evidence that he suffered a compensable injury. Objective medical evidence may include a physician's medical opinion based on an examination, a patient's medical history, and the physician's education and experience.
Although a medical opinion supported by a treatise or other scientific authority may be more persuasive, physicians are not required to offer such support.

State v. Newman 2007 ND 148
Docket No.: 20060294
Filing Date: 9/5/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Persons accused of crimes have a constitutional right to a trial by an impartial jury.
An appellate court will not set aside a verdict merely on a whimsy or fanciful notion that prejudicial misconduct occurred.
A defendant on a criminal charge has a constitutional right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of the trial, but the right is not absolute and can be waived by the defendant.