Search Tips

8th Circuit decides N.D. case Monday, July 21, 2025

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decided U.S. v. Sharmake Abdullahi U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 23-3144

Read the court's opinion HERE.

Justia Opinion Summary (https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/23-3144/23-3144-2025-07-21.html?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2025-07-22-u-s-court-of-appeals-for-the-eighth-circuit-b9ce9ee903&utm_content=text-case-title-3)

In late October 2021, Shamsa Issack was sitting in her car in Fargo, North Dakota, when a man, later identified as Sharmake Mohamed Abdullahi, approached her with a gun and forced her to drive to Moorhead, Minnesota. After attempting to withdraw money from an ATM unsuccessfully, Abdullahi took Issack's cell phone and fled. Issack sought help from bank employees, who called the police. Abdullahi was later arrested and charged with state robbery and kidnapping.

The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota admitted Issack's statements to bank employees as excited utterances and allowed the jury to hear part of a recording of Issack's conversation with police before striking it from the record. Abdullahi's motion for a mistrial was denied, and he was convicted by a jury of kidnapping and attempted witness tampering. The district court sentenced him to 180 months' imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reviewed the case. The court affirmed the kidnapping conviction, finding sufficient evidence that Abdullahi's actions constituted kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1). However, the court vacated the attempted witness tampering conviction, concluding that the government failed to prove that Abdullahi contemplated a particular, foreseeable federal proceeding when he made phone calls from state custody. The court held that Abdullahi's actions did not meet the statutory definition of attempted witness tampering under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(b)(1) and 2.