New opinions: July 22 Thursday, July 22, 2021
The Supreme Court has issued seven new opinions.
The summaries are below.
To see an opinion, click on the "View Opinion" button. Opinions display in a printable format. Hyperlinks to all North Dakota opinions and rules cited in an opinion are included in the text: hover over the citation and click to follow the hyperlink.
See other Supreme Court opinions at: https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinions
State v. Schmidt, et al. 2021 ND 137 Highlight: Rule 32(c)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., does not provide the district court with authority to order that defense counsel be allowed to be present for a psycho-sexual evaluation. The district court has no authority under section 12.1-01-04(26), N.D.C.C., to order the Department of Human Services to allow defense counsel to be present during such an evaluation. A defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is satisfied when defense counsel is given notice and an opportunity to consult with the defendant prior to the evaluation. |
City of West Fargo v. McAllister, et al. 2021 ND 136 Highlight: A certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) should not be routinely granted and is reserved for cases involving unusual circumstances where failure to allow an immediate appeal would create a demonstrated prejudice or hardship. |
State v. Stands 2021 ND 135 Highlight: A person standing in an open doorway is in a public place and may be arrested without a warrant permitting entry into the home. |
Williams v. Williams, et al. 2021 ND 134 Highlight: A district court’s decision to modify parenting time may be affirmed, despite sparse findings of fact, when its rationale is clear from the record. |
Froehlich v. Froehlich, et al. 2021 ND 133 Highlight: Under N.D.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), a party has 60 days from service of notice of entry of the judgment to file an appeal. |
Yoney v. State 2021 ND 132 Highlight: This Court, on its own motion, may notice errors to which no objection has been taken if the errors are obvious or if they otherwise seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. |
Smith v. Isakson, et al. 2021 ND 131 Highlight: The Sixth Amendment does not extend the right to a jury trial for a violation of a Bismarck ordinance restricting the use of public property. |