Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1841 - 1850 of 12359 results
Great West Casualty Company v. Butler Machinery Company
2019 ND 200
Highlight: A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is based on pleadings, and if matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the district court, motion must be treated as a motion for summary judgment. |
Facio v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2019 ND 199
Highlight: An officer conducting an investigatory traffic stop must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion the motorist has violated or is violating the law. |
WSI v. Sandberg, et al.
2019 ND 198
Highlight: Pain is a symptom and may be considered in determining whether there is a substantial acceleration or substantial worsening of a preexisting injury, disease, or other condition, but pain alone is not a substantial acceleration or substantial worsening. |
Munson v. Indigo Acquisition Holdings, LLC, et al.
2019 ND 197
Highlight: A Stock Purchase Agreement submitted with the defendant’s answer qualifies as a “record” of a transaction under N.D.C.C. § 10-04-06(11). |
Estate of Hall
2019 ND 196
Highlight: The surviving spouse of a decedent may claim an elective share of the decedent’s testate or intestate estate. |
Smithberg v. Smithberg, et al.
2019 ND 195
Highlight: Courts do not strive to find irreconcilable conflicts between statutory provisions. |
State v. Thomas
2019 ND 194
Highlight: Granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be resorted to when a fundamental defect or occurrence in the trial proceedings exists that makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice. |
Newfield Exploration Company, et al. v. State, et al.
2019 ND 193
Highlight: District court erred in its interpretation of an oil and gas lease. |
State v. Blaskowski
2019 ND 192 Highlight: A chemical breath test was not “fairly administered” under N.D.C.C. § 39-20-07 because evidence failed to establish compliance with the approved method for conducting the test. |
State v. Norton
2019 ND 191
Highlight: The district court did not err by failing to require the State to name a specific individual who was threatened to establish a prima facie case of terrorizing. |