Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2321 - 2330 of 12446 results
Melendez v. Horning III, et al.
2018 ND 70
Highlight: Nonsignatories to arbitration agreement may compel signatories to the agreement to arbitrate under some circumstances. |
Parshall v. State
2018 ND 69
Highlight: Plea agreements are interpreted according to general contract principles. |
Owego Township v. Pfingsten
2018 ND 68 Highlight: A township's determination or award of damages must be appealed within thirty days of filing under N.D.C.C. §§ 24-07-22 and 28-34-01. |
Estate of Albrecht
2018 ND 67
Highlight: An estate's motion for summary judgment satisfies the statutory requirement that a proceeding on a claim be commenced within sixty days after the personal representative mailed the notice of disallowance. |
Yahnke v. State
2018 ND 66 Highlight: A district court's order denying Yahnke's post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Carroll v. Carroll (cross-reference w/20160190)
2018 ND 65 Highlight: An amended divorce judgment entered on remand and an order reducing child support obligation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Huft v. Huft
2018 ND 64 Highlight: Order granting disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
James Vault & Precast Co., et al. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc., et al.
2018 ND 63 Highlight: In a multi-claim or a multi-party lawsuit with some adjudicated claims, the Supreme Court will not exercise appellate jurisdiction in cases in which parties voluntarily dismiss without prejudice all remaining unadjudicated claims with an intent to circumvent the requirements of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and artificially manufacture finality for purposes of appellate jurisdiction. |
Riddle v. Riddle
2018 ND 62
Highlight: Under the plain language of N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(b)(1), an irregularity in the proceeding must result from an action "of the court, jury, or adverse party, or any court order or abuse of discretion that prevented a party from having a fair trial." |
State v. Kremer
2018 ND 61
Highlight: Self-represented parties should not be treated differently nor allowed any more or any less consideration than parties represented by counsel. "Property" subject to forfeiture includes noncontraband computer files as well as contraband computer files contained on an electronic device. |