Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2381 - 2390 of 12359 results
Disciplinary Board v. Lee
2017 ND 216 Highlight: Lawyer Disbarred. |
Coon, et al. v. N.D. Dep't of Health, et al.
2017 ND 215
Highlight: The Department of Health administrative regulations require all concentrated animal feeding operations to apply for and obtain a pollutant discharge elimination system permit. |
Lewis v. Smart
2017 ND 214
Highlight: A district court's decision whether to grant relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. |
State v. Rath
2017 ND 213 Highlight: A supervisory writ is issued rarely and cautiously only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases when no adequate alternative remedy exists. |
Conrad v. Wilkinson
2017 ND 212 Highlight: A pending lawsuit that does not affect title to real property may not be the basis for a party to file a lis pendens against the real property and an improperly filed lis pendens may be cancelled. |
Schwartzenberger v. McKenzie County Board of County Commissioners
2017 ND 211
Highlight: An appeal is not moot if the controversy is one of great public interest and involves the authority and power of public officials, or alternatively, if the matter is capable of repetition yet evading review. |
Welch v. WSI, et al.
2017 ND 210
Highlight: In an administrative appeal, the Court determines only whether a reasoning mind reasonably could have determined that the factual conclusions reached were proved by the weight of the evidence from the entire record. |
State v. Newark
2017 ND 209
Highlight: A district court's decision whether to grant a motion for continuance will not be set aside on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. |
Interest of M.S. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20140304, 20140435 & 2016023
2017 ND 208 Highlight: A demand for a change of judge under N.D.C.C. § 29-15-21 is not valid in a mental health proceeding if the judge sought to be disqualified has already ruled on any matter pertaining to the proceeding. |
State v. Helm
2017 ND 207 Highlight: A warrantless urine test may not be administered as a search incident to a lawful arrest for driving while impaired, and a driver may not be prosecuted for refusing a warrantless urine test incident to arrest. |