Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2411 - 2420 of 12137 results
|
Rice v. Neether
2016 ND 247
Highlight: The rebuttable presumption that a deed has been delivered at its date arises only after delivery has been separately established. |
|
Solwey v. Solwey
2016 ND 246
Highlight: For analysis of a prima facie showing for a change of primary residential responsibility, when the non-moving party submits a subsequent affidavit that conflicts with the person's initial affidavit submitted by the moving party, a district court must disregard any conflicting allegations in the subsequent affidavit. |
|
Jones v. Levi
2016 ND 245 Highlight: The basis for a district court decision reversing an administrative agency order must have been properly raised by a party at the administrative level. |
|
Nesheim v. Nesheim
2016 ND 244 |
|
Interest of E.G.U. (Consolidated w/20160356)(Confidential)
2016 ND 243 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
Matter of Hehn (cross-reference 20070167, 20110053, 20120070, (continued)
2016 ND 242 Highlight: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
State v. Timm
2016 ND 241 Highlight: DUI conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Jacobs-Raak v. Raak
2016 ND 240
Highlight: When the parties agree to a division of property, the district court should explain its reasons for not dividing the property according to that agreement. |
|
Interest of R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 239 Highlight: A district court order continuing R.F.'s hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Young, n/k/a Klein v. Young (cross-ref. w/20070293)
2016 ND 238 Highlight: District court order denying motion to change primary residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(4), and (7). |