Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2701 - 2710 of 12359 results
Interest of G.A.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2016 ND 136
Highlight: A request to treat a patient with prescribed medication requires two signatures, one from the patient's treating psychiatrist and one from another medical professional not involved in the patient's current diagnosis or treatment. |
State v. Putney (cross-reference w/20150237)
2016 ND 135 Highlight: A restitution order is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard. |
Zajac v. Traill County Water Resource District
2016 ND 134 Highlight: An appeal from a decision by a local governing body must be filed with the district court within thirty days of the decision. |
State v. Baker
2016 ND 133
Highlight: An indigent defendant facing a felony charge is entitled to have counsel provided at public expense to represent the defendant at every stage of the proceeding from initial appearance through appeal, unless the defendant waives this right. |
State v. Clayton
2016 ND 131
Highlight: Restitution is limited to those damages directly related to, and resulting from, the defendant's criminal action. |
State v. Carlson
2016 ND 130
Highlight: A charging information may be amended at any time before the verdict or finding unless an additional or different offense is charged or a substantial right of the defendant is prejudiced. |
Ratliff v. State
2016 ND 129 Highlight: The district court may take judicial notice of previously filed orders when sentencing a defendant. |
State v. Beaulieu
2016 ND 128
Highlight: A successor judge is not required to certify familiarity with the trial record before deciding a post-trial motion. |
Robinson v. State
2016 ND 127 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Lohmann v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2016 ND 126 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |