Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

2721 - 2730 of 12359 results

Disciplinary Board v. Ward 2016 ND 115
Docket No.: 20150354
Filing Date: 6/10/2016
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An isolated instance of ordinary negligence does not constitute lack of competence or diligence under the rules of professional conduct.

PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C., et al. (20150008) 2016 ND 114
Docket No.: 20150301
Filing Date: 6/10/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The time to appeal an interlocutory order runs from service of notice of the appealable order or judgment, not from service of notice of the interlocutory order.
A judgment creditor may serve no more than 50 post-judgment interrogatories regardless of pre-judgment interrogatories.
A party's disagreement with how a court interpreted the law does not provide license to disobey a court order without consequence, and a party's failure to abide by an order is punishable as a contempt of court.

Disciplinary Board v. Ward 2016 ND 113
Docket No.: 20150337
Filing Date: 6/9/2016
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The Supreme Court defers to the Disciplinary Board's findings on the credibility of a witness.
A lawyer who has withdrawn or has been discharged by the client has a duty to surrender promptly all papers and other property to which the client is entitled.
Injury or potential injury warranting suspension may include a client suffering monetary losses or incurring additional costs when forced to hire another lawyer to handle the matter.

Norman v. State 2016 ND 112
Docket No.: 20150298
Filing Date: 6/8/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court orders denying an application for post-conviction relief are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (6), and (7).

State v. Musselman (cross-reference w/20150071) 2016 ND 111
Docket No.: 20150250
Filing Date: 6/7/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An investigative stop must be justified by the officer's reasonable and articulable suspicion that a law has been or is being violated.
An officer can use information received from other persons along with his or her personal observations to form the factual basis needed for a legal investigatory stop.

Disciplinary Board v. Enget 2016 ND 110
Docket No.: 20160139
Filing Date: 6/6/2016
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Holkesvig v. Maring 2016 ND 109
Docket No.: 20150247
Filing Date: 6/2/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment dismissing complaint and order denying motion for relief are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (6), and (7).

Holkesvig v. Edison, et al. 2016 ND 108
Docket No.: 20150266
Filing Date: 6/2/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment dismissing complaint, order denying motion for relief from judgment, and orders denying post-appeal motions are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (6), and (7).

Holkesvig v. VandeWalle, et al. 2016 ND 107
Docket No.: 20150246
Filing Date: 6/2/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Neither the North Dakota Constitution nor the North Dakota Century Code provides the Supreme Court with the power to divest district courts of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The filing of a petition for rehearing stays the mandate of a Supreme Court judgement until disposition of the petition.
The Supreme Court will not set aside a district court's decision merely because the court applied an incorrect reason, if the result would be the same under the correct law and reasoning.
A petition for rehearing is the proper means to afford the Supreme Court an opportunity to correct factual misstatements in the original opinion.

Jury v. Barnes County Municipal Airport Authority 2016 ND 106
Docket No.: 20150374
Filing Date: 6/2/2016
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A person acting as her own attorney is equally bound by rules of procedure, even if she lacks understanding of those rules or the correct procedures.
A district court is not required to independently give notice of a hearing when notice has been given by one of the parties.
A party must timely request oral argument on a motion; otherwise, a party waives its right to a hearing.

Page 273 of 1236