Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2721 - 2730 of 12279 results
|
State v. Horning
2016 ND 10
Highlight: The State may move for civil forfeiture of property within a criminal case. |
|
State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, et al. (cross-ref. w/20140444)
2016 ND 9
Highlight: A district court abuses its discretion when it does not follow the procedural requirement of providing notice before amending an order or judgment to correct a clerical error. |
|
State v. Ballard
2016 ND 8 Highlight: Suspicionless search of an unsupervised probationer's home is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. |
|
State v. Russell
2016 ND 7 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment revoking defendant's probation and sentencing him to prison is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3). |
|
Sturre v. Levi
2016 ND 6 Highlight: Judgment affirming the Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision to suspend driving privileges for 180 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
|
Myers v. State
2016 ND 5 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
|
State v. Suelzle
2016 ND 4 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault, aggravated reckless driving, reckless endangerment, leaving the scene of an accident involving serious personal injury, leaving the scene of an accident involving an unattended vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident involving an attended vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Johnson v. State
2016 ND 3 Highlight: Denial of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, NEJD
2016 ND 2 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Devils Lake. |
|
Stock v. Stock
2016 ND 1
Highlight: It is not clearly erroneous for a court to award permanent spousal support instead of rehabilitative spousal support where the circumstances warrant both awards. |